Nimoy talks Spock—1967.

Discussion in 'Star Trek - The Original & Animated Series' started by Warped9, Feb 22, 2023.

  1. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    An interesting interview of Leonard Nimoy on Spock and Star Trek from 1967.

     
    VSAFaculty, Qonundrum, Henoch and 4 others like this.
  2. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Nimoy evidently didn't understand the Warp scale thinking Warp 8 was eight times the speed of light. :lol:
     
  3. Ronald Held

    Ronald Held Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Location:
    On the USS Sovereign
    TOS Warp 8 was 8^3 times c.
     
    Qonundrum likes this.
  4. plynch

    plynch Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Location:
    Outer Graceland
    According to Franz Joseph’s tech manual. Which I loved btw and still have.
     
    Metryq likes this.
  5. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Even thats too slow within context of the stories.
     
  6. Ronald Held

    Ronald Held Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Location:
    On the USS Sovereign
    Yes there is a Cochrane factor in front of the official formula.
     
  7. Noname Given

    Noname Given Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    Noname Given
    IDK if that was really articulated during the run of the series. I think it came into 'being' when Franz Joseph did his Star Trek Technical Manual, and that wasn't in Bookshops until 1975.

    I mean even in the series you have situations (like in TOS S3 That Which Survives, where they cover a distance of 990.7 light years in a couple of days (with a brief stint at Warp 14 for about 15 minutes). Even if it were WF^3 <--- That's still not fast enough to cover that distance in a little under 3 days - as they did in the episode.

    My point being: I don't think the actual 'speed' was even really nailed down at the time of the series run - it was always 'Speed of Plot'/whatever the story for that week required.

    Given that - I think Nimpoy's answer is just fine as it just highlights that the ship can travel faster than light.
     
    Metryq, Skipper and publiusr like this.
  8. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Nope, Roddenberry established the formula while the show was in production and it’s in The Making Of Star Trek.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2023
    aridas sofia likes this.
  9. ZapBrannigan

    ZapBrannigan Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Location:
    New York State
    There's ample evidence that GR didn't do the arithmetic when he was deciding this stuff. He blue-skyed a claim that the Hangar Deck would hold a whole fleet of jumbo jets, for example. I remember looking at "warp factor cubed" as a teenager, and compared to even "local" interstellar distances, it's too slow.

    There's even a song about it :bolian:
     
  10. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Whether GR blue skied it is irrelevant. He put forth the formula back when the show was in production so it definitely predates FJ’s publications by several years.

    The fact that GR’s formula is still too slow within the context of TOS’ stories is also irrelevant. But he did have a somewhat better grasp of the subject than Nimoy.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2023
  11. Richard S. Ta

    Richard S. Ta Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2021
    Location:
    Silent Running
    Regardless of the ensuing dull-discussion about the warp scale, it's a lovely interview. Thank you for sharing!
     
    CrockAlley and Metryq like this.
  12. publiusr

    publiusr Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Location:
    publiusr
    The Richter Scale is a base 10 logarithmic scale....something like that?
     
  13. Ronald Held

    Ronald Held Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Location:
    On the USS Sovereign
    No a factor greater than one that is spatially varying.
     
    aridas sofia likes this.
  14. ZapBrannigan

    ZapBrannigan Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Location:
    New York State
    On TNG, the warp scale is an asymptotic curve which approaches but never reaches warp 10, because warp 10 is defined as infinity.

    TOS exceeds its definition of warp 10 in "The Changeling" and "That Which Survives," and IIRC, the TNG Technical Manual expressly states that Starfleet changed the scale for the TNG era. But the old scale remains open to interpretation.
     
    Metryq likes this.
  15. publiusr

    publiusr Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Location:
    publiusr
    One thing about getting older is that the past seems closer. This interview was only a few decades ago.

    Yet…in the 1980’s…the ‘60’s seemed more distant
     
    Poltargyst, Metryq and ZapBrannigan like this.
  16. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    In a weird way our memories allow us to travel back in time seemingly in an instant.
     
  17. ZapBrannigan

    ZapBrannigan Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Location:
    New York State
    That's so true. Being young gives you less perspective, so "a few years back" seems like distant ages ago.

    In the 1970s, it seemed like 20 year old songs were from way back, from a whole different culture. But today, any song less than 33 years old is in my "Contemporary" playlist. To me, that's when the decades stopped having their own distinctive sounds, and pop music stopped evolving. From about 1990 on, I can't tell the difference anymore.
     
    Metryq, Daddy Todd and publiusr like this.
  18. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    There was a lot of music I liked, and still love, from the latter half of the 20th century. It did start unravelling in the 1990s, but it really all fell apart in the 2000s and has been nose-diving since. There is so little new music during the past twenty some years that I’ve actually liked. The vast majority of music on my playlists is from 25-65 years ago, and most of that from before the 1990s. There is very very little music on my playlists from the past twenty some years, and practically all of it is from 10-20 years ago.
     
    Qonundrum, Poltargyst, Metryq and 3 others like this.
  19. ZapBrannigan

    ZapBrannigan Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Location:
    New York State
    My experience exactly.
     
    publiusr, Poltargyst and Metryq like this.
  20. Warped9

    Warped9 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Location:
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Periodically I enjoy those Youtube reactions of people in their 20s-40s listening to music or watching films and television from before they were born. So often they are astounded, often exclaiming, “WTF! Why don’t we have stuff like this today?”
     
    Qonundrum and Metryq like this.