Yes, you should definitely check out all their previous credits. All of them.As for everything else, I'd look at their earlier work, as Dennis said.

Yes, you should definitely check out all their previous credits. All of them.As for everything else, I'd look at their earlier work, as Dennis said.
I enjoyed them referring to Star Wars and Indiana Jones as "all those chestnuts from the period."
I don't see anything there to suggest that the plan for Star Trek 3 is to go villainless.
From a marketing standpoint, I think Paramount will insist on an adversary of some sort.
Over-the-top villains like Khan are nice to have, but are not necessary for every film unless you insist on conforming the franchise to the superhero comic-book mold.
From a marketing standpoint, I think Paramount will insist on an adversary of some sort.
Over-the-top villains like Khan are nice to have, but are not necessary for every film unless you insist on conforming the franchise to the superhero comic-book mold.
You mean, the movies that actually make big money for the studios.
I am a fan so I would choose quality over quantity.
I am a fan so I would choose quality over quantity.
If the majority of ratings sites and box office returns are to be believed, you got both with Star Trek Into Darkness.
But for Michael Bay, There Can Only Be One.
Some more from the writing team in part 2 of Trekcore's interview.
Over-the-top villains like Khan are nice to have, but are not necessary for every film unless you insist on conforming the franchise to the superhero comic-book mold.
You mean, the movies that actually make big money for the studios.
Nemesis had an over-the-top villain in Shinzon. Didn't make big money. It takes more than a rug-chewing villain to put butts in seats.
BTW, the top movie of the last year was Frozen, which featured a theatrical but not very "evil" villain in Elsa. Hans became the evil one, but he was not the draw of the film. If anything he dragged the film down the most, because he was the least credible.
It's just not necessary to have over-the-top mustache-twisting villains to make money.
I'm not so sure. Maybe it's because I love the Trek mythos so much and enjoy seeing stories which delve into it, and am weary after so many generic aliens of the week in TNG, VOY and ENT. Gonna keep an open mind, though.i was hoping for exploration so bad. I am pumped.
What's interesting in the mythos is the more popular aspects are the ones that are not about exploration. TWOK, TUC, FC are all epic clashes with big villains.I thought stories about exploration were most of the Trek mythos.![]()
They at least say a lot of things people like to hear, you gotta give them that.What we keep on coming back to is the basic credo of Star Trek, that opening prologue you hear at the beginning of each Original Series episode. That's our mantra for what we're trying to accomplish here.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.