• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

New Talosians?

I think nanites would work better than transporters for medical procedures.

But, I also think that worm holes would work better than transporters for travel....at least in science-fiction.
 
You're not much fun are you? You do know I was (initially at least) engaging you in a little banter, but ho hum.

Yes the technology to recreate someones' body does exist in the 23rd century. It exists in the 22nd.

It's called a transporter. It keeps (at least short term) records of the precise configurations of bodies transported.

What I'm suggesting is that given we know such a body can be recreated (see transporter duplicates, delayed transfers, aliens hidden in pattern buffers, etc, etc) AND we know a consciousness can be transferred into such a body then it becomes only a matter of refinement to essentially transfer someone into a pristine, uninjured version of themselves.

Of course it's not "handy", but a certain semantic inaccuracy tends to be a given when someone is being flippant or whimsical, which I'd assumed was obvious.

Never mind.
I think it is common misconception that transporters are like replicators. I don't think they are. Outside some freak accidents, they don't duplicate matter. (And perhaps in those cases there is some parallel universe where instead of being duplicated the person just completely vanished.)
 
I think nanites would work better than transporters for medical procedures.

But, I also think that worm holes would work better than transporters for travel....at least in science-fiction.

Worm holes are very good for moving compost around, it's not what you'd call an exact science though and wouldn't be the preferred choice for quickly getting someone out of trouble. Does, however, keep my veg patch in good order so mustn't grumble.

Introducing nanites to a human body sounds good though. Couldn't go wrong in fact :)

I think it is common misconception that transporters are like replicators. I don't think they are. Outside some freak accidents, they don't duplicate matter. (And perhaps in those cases there is some parallel universe where instead of being duplicated the person just completely vanished.)

I think they work however the plot needs them to work.
 
What I'm suggesting is that given we know such a body can be recreated (see transporter duplicates, delayed transfers, aliens hidden in pattern buffers, etc, etc) AND we know a consciousness can be transferred into such a body then it becomes only a matter of refinement to essentially transfer someone into a pristine, uninjured version of themselves.
Not only that, but the computer can keep track of DNA and rebuild the pattern based upon that DNA record. How is aging and death still a thing? O_o
 
Not only that, but the computer can keep track of DNA and rebuild the pattern based upon that DNA record. How is aging and death still a thing? O_o

Oooohhh, functional immortality to add to my list of things that seem to be quietly forgotten in Trek, along with transporter toilets and telekinesis potions.

Good call!
 
Last edited:
Because the writers didn’t think of it. It was a plot device to move people as cheaply as possible production wise.
I was referring to a specific episode where Pulaski prematurely ages due to exposure to disease. Data and Riker retrieve a sample of her DNA from her hair brush to de-age her, for lack of a better term.
 
W7z99qH.jpg


<snicker>
 
This is a little old now, but it's interesting that it was done long before anyone knew where Discovery was going with Season 2. And, damn....he's almost got it as if Vina is in the beep chair, because his depiction of Hillary looks a lot like Vina after the wreck.

Edit: I am taking the image down voluntarily, without anyone having raised an objection, because the point was made and it's just not needed here. For anyone interested, it is the Garrison cartoon with Trump and Hillary and the beep chair from 'The Menagerie'.

Chair2.jpg
 
Last edited:
God, what a moronic cartoon.

It's very unfortunate that Garrison is even aware of Star Trek, because he continually uses it in nasty ways. He has another cartoon, of Kirk and Sulu, that is very derogatory toward George Takei and the LGBTQ community. It's out there on the net, but I'm not going to post it here because it's so utterly offensive.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top