• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

new starship design

It has already basically been done.

The Adamant class at Journal of Applied Treknology.


that is not like an upside down galaxy or like the sovereign redo i suggested.... but that class is pretty good though....
 
There's plenty of Sovereign-Class refits / reconfigurations at BCFiles.Com & BC Universe Central forums in the screencaps & mod request threads.
 
Hmmmm.....i see.... interesting..... any ideas for a totally new starship design?
 
Sure. I'd like to see Galactic Squirrel or anyone else here tackle U.S.S. Titan-era (warp-capable freighters, since "impulse-only" is bullshit,) colony transports, and/or pleasure cruise-ships. "Water-world" style aquatic colonies.
 
not sure if it counts but i did do a fighter for the post dominion war era which kind of counts as the titan era it was sometime mind it was called the perry class. did a 2d version plus a 3d version in sketch up.

PERRYCLASSGUNSHIP.jpg
 
How about this for a new starship design...

Take a GALAXY class vessel and flip it upside down and give it longer necells...

thoughts? Questions?

At the risk of snark, I have to ask "What's the point of it?" After having drawn and redrawn hundreds (literally) of starships from the TOS and TMP eras, I'm amazed at the idea that doing nothing more than flipping the orientation of a nacelle, etc, somehow creates a 'whole new ship'.

No, you've just flipped a nacelle.

Compare the Leonidas class: http://www.jaynz.info/view_image.php?pid=29
and the Saladin class: http://www.jaynz.info/view_image.php?pid=1

Functionally, they're the exact same ship. Hell, the ARE the same ship, with just a part flipped on it. What's the point on it? Just a different visual cue? Would Star Fleet really require and maintain two different designs for the exact same capabilities? Seems unlikely in my book.

So, again, what are you trying to accomplish by moving parts around? What niche of the fleet are you hoping to fill that isn't already filled by the Soveriegn?
 
^ Will one of those two on Jaynz be getting the boot, then? :shifty::)
 
How about this for a new starship design...

Take a GALAXY class vessel and flip it upside down and give it longer necells...

thoughts? Questions?

At the risk of snark, I have to ask "What's the point of it?" After having drawn and redrawn hundreds (literally) of starships from the TOS and TMP eras, I'm amazed at the idea that doing nothing more than flipping the orientation of a nacelle, etc, somehow creates a 'whole new ship'.

No, you've just flipped a nacelle.

Compare the Leonidas class: http://www.jaynz.info/view_image.php?pid=29
and the Saladin class: http://www.jaynz.info/view_image.php?pid=1

Functionally, they're the exact same ship. Hell, the ARE the same ship, with just a part flipped on it. What's the point on it? Just a different visual cue? Would Star Fleet really require and maintain two different designs for the exact same capabilities? Seems unlikely in my book.

So, again, what are you trying to accomplish by moving parts around? What niche of the fleet are you hoping to fill that isn't already filled by the Soveriegn?




A. I did not say flip a "nacelle". If you think about it, on the "TOTALLY" fliped "GALAXY CLASS" were would you put a bridge? There is also a possibillity of having something like "DECK 1-A".

B. As for the soveriegn class, did you ever see one with a different saucer to an extreme? Or compleetly different "PYLONS". If you think about it changing them would constitute a minor body change at a min.




But those are still good points... It gets me thinking... How much of a change must there be to make it a new class?
 
No Offence to the guy who made this ,but as a kid when I would play with my Micro Machines if I wanted more variaty I would just flip my Galaxy class upside down and I'd have an instant Nebula. Seeing that fliped galaxy just brought back memories that's all.

I used to have the model kit, and always though that upsidedown, the galaxy class did have a sort of sleek menance to it, that the 2D profile doesn't really demonstrate. It's the deflector looking like an eye that does this. The nebula's deflector is still under the saucer as the Galaxy's is.

So I've always thought there some cause to having a deflector on the top side.

I've been doodling ships for years (alas as you can see I can't draw to save my life!) but most of them are downside up.

I think the abnormal profile also gives a dominion or maybe romulan feel. and Y-wing

j607jl.jpg


But then if you flip it...
11sozgn.jpg
 
not sure cmdr sho if this is what your thinking of with your sovereign ship just a side view at present may tweak the secondry hull abit
sov-novaside.jpg
 
sov-novaside.jpg


I could see this one with an elongated 'arrowhead' (ie: Ares-Class / Prometheus-Class) saucer section, with a scaled-down 'megaphaser' under the saucer or two "Wyvern Cannons" (created by Vektor,) in the very tip of the saucer section. The ones from the USS Grandeur-A, that cross pulse phaser output from the Defiant with the Galaxy X-Class cannon from "All Good Things".

http://www.scifi-meshes.com/forums/3d-wips/638-uss-grandeur-final-version-73.html#post395683

wip_127.jpg


Image by Vektor
 
Last edited:
It is certainly getting closer!!! The pylons, could you make them look like voyager style? And prehaps strech out the secondary hull longer, but not too much...
 
No Offence to the guy who made this ,but as a kid when I would play with my Micro Machines if I wanted more variaty I would just flip my Galaxy class upside down and I'd have an instant Nebula. Seeing that fliped galaxy just brought back memories that's all.

I used to have the model kit, and always though that upsidedown, the galaxy class did have a sort of sleek menance to it, that the 2D profile doesn't really demonstrate. It's the deflector looking like an eye that does this. The nebula's deflector is still under the saucer as the Galaxy's is.

So I've always thought there some cause to having a deflector on the top side.

I've been doodling ships for years (alas as you can see I can't draw to save my life!) but most of them are downside up.

I think the abnormal profile also gives a dominion or maybe romulan feel. and Y-wing

j607jl.jpg
WOW great minds think alot apparantly:eek: those look a lot like some of the doodles I have done over the years!:vulcan:
 
i think it's not an original design, unless you use the basic layout of a saucer, secondary hull, and interconnecting dorsal that the galaxy class uses, with some galaxy class touches IE curved and gallant lines. Otherwise, you're just flipping a ship on it's head, ala NX class, and calling it a day.
 
GEEEAAAHHH!! ZOMBIE THREAD!!! RUN!!!

Wait! was there a time warp? how can you be replying a year later and still be only a Lt. Commander?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top