New Star Trek Into Darkness Teaser!
- Thread starter TrekToday
- Start date
Anything you can do Khan can do better than you.
It's not Khan.
Yes it's Khan.
No, not Khan.
Yes it's KHAAAAAAAAAAANNN!
It's not Khan.
Yes it's Khan.
No, not Khan.
Yes it's KHAAAAAAAAAAANNN!
Kha-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-an!
Nothing in the trailer rules out Khan. Not by a light year.
Starfleet is not about vengeance. - Perhaps it should be.
Right on!
Right on!
"I will walk over your cold corpses" is definitely Khan-worthy cheese.
The Botany Bay could have been found by then-Captain Marcus after the timelines diverged, Khan thawed out and recruited into Starfleet Intelligence. Then it all goes shit-shaped because Khan's a little on the unstable side.
I'm thinking maybe he's not Khan, though. He's better. At what? Everything.
The Botany Bay could have been found by then-Captain Marcus after the timelines diverged, Khan thawed out and recruited into Starfleet Intelligence. Then it all goes shit-shaped because Khan's a little on the unstable side.
I'm thinking maybe he's not Khan, though. He's better. At what? Everything.
It's really unfortunate that Captain Robau is dead. Were he alive, the trailer would be different.
SHERLOCK: I'm better.
ROBAU: Better at what?
SHERLOCK: Everything.
ROBAU: I can prove you wrong.
SHERLOCK: I'm better.
ROBAU: Better at what?
SHERLOCK: Everything.
ROBAU: I can prove you wrong.
look like a standard big budget hollywood scifi action flick and not trek,the thing that harrison fly look like a supeup future helicopter.
Had Robau been alive, that conversation wouldn't even have taken place. Robau would have laid waste to Sherlock on first sight.
I think some Trek fans are just going to have to get used to the fact that it is 2013 not 1978! CGI and big action sequences are here to stay! Trek is changing, accept it!
I will not see it
I am not against ST looking like a big budget hollywood flic, but "seek out new civilizations" has been replaced by "seek out new special effects" "seek out new underwear" etc.
Trek is not changing, this is not trek. They could have had the decency to call it Battlestar Enterprise, so people would know that this travesty has nothing to do with the vision Gene Roddenberry had, en what gave a lot of people the name Trekkies.
THIS.
We also have to face the fact that trekkies moan and groan every chance they get. I well remember the bitching pre-TNG about everything under the sun, including the bald captain (as if Shatner was follicularly blessed, ever) and the idiot android
Not to mention the bitching post DS9 and VOY and ENT.
First and foremost, when it's a Paramount issued movie or series with the name "Star Trek", guess what? It's Star Trek!
Beyond that, why is there all is holiness about the "vision" Gene Roddenberry had, like it's supposed to be this utopia that even he was pumped up to believe by sycophants and followers over time?
Star Trek's base was to show that we would still be around a few hundred years from now and going further out into the galaxy than anyone now can ever dream, encountering the peril and wonder of what's out there!
Jeez, the first friggin' pilot had Pike threatening to snap The Keepers' neck if he kept up the illusions! How peaceful and understanding was that?
Beyond that, why is there all is holiness about the "vision" Gene Roddenberry had, like it's supposed to be this utopia that even he was pumped up to believe by sycophants and followers over time?
Star Trek's base was to show that we would still be around a few hundred years from now and going further out into the galaxy than anyone now can ever dream, encountering the peril and wonder of what's out there!
Jeez, the first friggin' pilot had Pike threatening to snap The Keepers' neck if he kept up the illusions! How peaceful and understanding was that?
Similar threads
