But...our childhoods...
Spoilers New Short Trek - Q&A
- Thread starter Tuskin38
- Start date
That's extremely aesthetic from a 60's point of view
Oh ok.
Also, no seatbelts.
Why don’t modern producers get Spock? Abraham’s didn’t get him and neither do the discovery writers, Spock singing? Feeling envy? Number one singing sorry cute but I don’t buy it. The problem with discovery and all the short Treks are that they are fluff there’s no weight to them
In Kurtzman-Trek, the Disco-Ent bridge is the true one period, until we're shown otherwise. Which doesn't bother me one bit. I've never liked the TOS aesthetic.
^ What this person said.
***
Also, can I just say yet again how much I would LOVE it if they announced a Pike series? Because I would.
Last edited:
I don’t think they under stand Number One either, cool, computer like, logical, second in command, I don’t get that from this number one but I did from the cage version
It makes perfect sense to this Whovian.
People that are cool, computer like, logical in a work environment can become more relaxed while in a closed environment with someone who is like them.
I could easily see Pre-TOS Spock like that based off how we saw him act in ‘The Cage’.
Something just happens to him between then and TOS that makes him more reserved, and act more Vulcan like.
Though even in TOS, stuff breaks through. Like in ‘Amok Time’ where he’s clearly very happy to see Kirk is still alive.
we're all but told the trauma of losing burnham to the far future is what does it.
Well like I said, you're apparently on the camp that says that Kor, Kang and Koloth always had ridges (no Enterprise does not explain how they go from non ridged to ridged, those 3 Klingons weren't even born yet). I understand that point of view but it's not really my thing.
Uh.... Yeah?
Abrahams? Is that the tall bearded guy from The Savage Curtain? He was more into Kirk than Spock.
No. The guy who cast Gamora as Uhura.
Similar threads
