Just like how there was never another Enterprise after its destruction in The Search for Spock?
Oh... wait...
It's so pervasive I was beginning to think I missed something, another source. All he said was he wanted to pick up in tone from TUC which is hardly surprising given that was the last thing he made Trek wise. From that we've suddenly got a basically confirmed movie era post TUC series. Something of a leap I feel.lol Tosk.
But just to clarify: It was nobody's idea. Meyer just made a comment that he compared Fuller's ideas to the politics seen in TUC, and all of a sudden everyone and his brother now thinks we're getting a post-TUC show.
It's so pervasive I was beginning to think I missed something, another source. All he said was he wanted to pick up in tone from TUC which is hardly surprising given that was the last thing he made Trek wise. From that we've suddenly got a basically confirmed movie era post TUC series. Something of a leap I feel.
As big of a deal as some people make of Paramount owning the movies, therefore CBS can't spin off something from them, it seems the same would apply to Star Trek VI.
...them is about the new JJ movies created after the split with CBS.
He didn't say that, the interviewer/source added that in so certain readers who don't know the names of every starship in the Trek universe could understand what ship it was and where it appeared before.Fuller was clearly referring to the Reliant from TWOK. Your own post quoting him said as much.
And anyway, the new show isn't going to be about the Reliant. Or the Enterprise-B. Or the Enterprise-C.
A small sticker on a Blu-ray disc does not explain everything.You mean the new movies that say clearly on the discs that CBS owns the trademarks, just like on the first ten films?
A small sticker on a Blu-ray disc does not explain everything.
Do we REALLY want to know???Captain Incompetent or Captain Dead Woman Walking?
Just kidding. Enterprise-B is fully untapped. We know nothing about it beyond the fact Kirk "died" on its maiden voyage.
He didn't say that, the interviewer/source added that in so certain readers who don't know the names of every starship in the Trek universe could understand what ship it was and where it appeared before.
Okay. You seem to know it all.
Paramount still has the distribution rights for every Trek movie, which allows them to shop them around to cable outlets from IFC to VH-1 Classic. But if someone wants to create & sell some merchandise based on the characters and places in those movies, then they have to talk to CBS.Of course not. But we don't really know who owns the stuff involved in those first ten films.A small sticker on a Blu-ray disc does not explain everything.
Reliant A, B, C, D, Z, NuReliant, IDK, whatever floats your boat.So are you implying that he wants to make a series about the nuReliant?
lol Tosk.
But just to clarify: It was nobody's idea. Meyer just made a comment that he compared Fuller's ideas to the politics seen in TUC, and all of a sudden everyone and his brother now thinks we're getting a post-TUC show.
No one's saying that.I get the feeling people would somehow find the show worthwhile based on the ship being called Reliant. Which I don't get?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.