They ran out of crayons to color the photos.Okay. Fine, I'll ask. Why isn't this book being self-published by "Jacobs/Brown Press"?
Neil

They ran out of crayons to color the photos.Okay. Fine, I'll ask. Why isn't this book being self-published by "Jacobs/Brown Press"?
Neil
I suggest checking out Star Trek Fact Check, written by "Harvey" who posts on this board (and in this thread). Posts specifically about the Cushman books are:could someone please explain why the authors are apparently a red flag??
Thanks in advance!
I'd love to see the book --but the back cover is atrocious.! The two pics with clapboards covering the actors? The author and his dog? That bio? Woah.
A new TOS book featuring 300 rarely seen photos from TOS Season 1: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0692643850?keywords=To Boldly Go&qid=1458140688&ref_=sr_1_1&s=books&sr=1-1
The big draw of a book like this is to see rare images from TOS. I'm interested.
Gurian was art director on the "These Are The Voyages" books and visually they share a resemblance with this new book. Cushman also wrote the intro for this new book. As such, it's a good bet Gurian repeats Cushman's errors, such as budgets and filming dates.
In addition, Cushman shares credit with Gurian for the book's "interior design," and Cushman's wife and co-author of These Are The Voyages, Susan Osborn, shares credit with Gurian for the design of the cover.
Has it been established that Osborn is married to Cash?
Neil
They share a certain pedigree.I don't want to see this become a nitpick thread on the book -- I enjoyed seeing a few photos I had not seen before -- but it looks as if the research and proofreading (or lack thereof) may be on the level of TATV.
Browsing very quickly through the Amazon "Look Inside" this morning, I caught several errors in the first few pages -- both grammatical and factual. The most glaring for me was in the WNMHGB chapter where the 1st pilot version of the 11-foot Enterprise is identified as the 2nd pilot version (the date shown on the slate was misread as 7/65 instead although it was clearly 1/65). The miniature clearly lacked the telltale grilles of the 2nd pilot ship.
Strangely I cannot go back and view those chapters again for some reason; the preview now stops at "The Cage". Anyone else encounter this?
I don't want to see this become a nitpick thread on the book -- I enjoyed seeing a few photos I had not seen before -- but it looks as if the research and proofreading (or lack thereof) may be on the level of TATV.
*Edit - I logged in again and now the preview goes through "The Return of the Archons". Another odd gaffe is a stage shot of the 1st or 2nd pilot Enterprise attributed to "Tomorrow is Yesterday". Oh my...
With a lot of books on Amazon, you can preview more pages if you log in to your customer account.
Kor
That right there is the issue with a Cushman book. How are you to know what's accurate and what isn't? He has proven time and again he is an unreliable source.Still, I enjoyed learning (if true) that the round playing cards in "Mudd's Women" were off-the-shelf items.
Apparently round playing cards been around for quite awhile: http://www.wopc.co.uk/waddingtons/cir-q-lar/indexThat right there is the issue with a Cushman book. How are you to know what's accurate and what isn't? He has proven time and again he is an unreliable source.
Neil
Nice!All kinds of great behind the scenes photos here (for free
https://www.flickr.com/photos/birdofthegalaxy/albums
Spockboy
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.