Dax changed over to command in either one of the Avatars or Abyss. She had already moved over and was named XO of the Defiant before they went on the big Gamma Quadrant trip in the Mission Gamma books.About DS9 I didn't care for the time jump either. I felt a bit lost when reading the Typhon Pact books that brought everything forward. I knew Dax was on the Aventine (and the Soul Key I think it was even made mention of her desire to pursue command), but there were so many unexplained changes it was a bit jarring. Thankfully some future books filled in some of the gaps and it all makes sense now, but at the time it was a bit confusing. They probably would have been better filling in the gap first, at least IMO.
Dax changed over to command in either one of the Avatars or Abyss. She had already moved over and was named XO of the Defiant before they went on the big Gamma Quadrant trip in the Mission Gamma books.
I had a thought the other day. Do we even know for a fact that the new show is even set in the Prime universe? They keep talking about how different it's going to be, so that me thinking, what if it's set in an alternate universe?
My God, the Picard we've been watching all these years has been the Mirror Universe version the whole time!
But seriously, you make a good point. For now it's all speculation.
Being set further into the future the new series doesn't have quite as many constraints as the prequel series. I would love it if they really embraced the new in "new worlds, new life, & new civilizations" instead of timorously backtracking to where we've gone before.
I had a thought the other day. Do we even know for a fact that the new show is even set in the Prime universe? They keep talking about how different it's going to be, so that me thinking, what if it's set in an alternate universe?
They said it's different because it's not going to be about a captain and his crew exploring strange new worlds on a starship, and because it's a more contemplative piece rather than an action-centric show like Discovery. It's different because Picard is in a different stage of his life, doing different things.
Yeah, I guess you're probably right.That seems very unlikely. This is Sir Patrick Stewart's triumphant return to the role, probably the last production in which he'll ever play Jean-Luc Picard, and one in which he has a great deal of creative control. Surely neither he, CBS, nor the audience would want it to be anything other than the definitive chronicle of the later life of the Picard we know.
And why would it be? Making something an alternate reality only makes sense if it's set alongside or before a previously told story, like the Kelvin films are. Maybe 98% of the audience has no awareness of the novels at all, or even of Star Trek Online. As far as most viewers will be concerned, this will be the one and only account they have of the Trek universe post-Nemesis. So what would it be alternate to? That doesn't even make sense.
They said it's different because it's not going to be about a captain and his crew exploring strange new worlds on a starship, and because it's a more contemplative piece rather than an action-centric show like Discovery. It's different because Picard is in a different stage of his life, doing different things.
Changing subjects slightly: what are some of the dangling storylines that have yet to be wrapped up?
Was that thing about the Andorians in Titan books ever straightened out? I haven't read the book, but I remember a couple of people saying there was a point about Andorians and a transporter or something.
And I guess we're never going to find out Lorgh was up to.
Anything else?
I'll be interested to see how the destruction of Romulus is handled in the novel continuity as we are closing in on just a few months. That will obviously have significant ramifications for the Pact, which is one reason I hope it is featured in the novels and we can see the consequences.
That... would hurt.Well, we do know they can use stuff from the Kelvinverse movies now, so hopefully we'll get that. With the way my luck tends to go it'll probably turn out the Picard series is going to wipe out the Novelverse, and they'll end it just before the Hobus supernova.
Well, we do know they can use stuff from the Kelvinverse movies now, so hopefully we'll get that. With the way my luck tends to go it'll probably turn out the Picard series is going to wipe out the Novelverse, and they'll end it just before the Hobus supernova.
most of the 22, 23rd won't be affected, there more worried about discovery, which did contradict some books already, with it saying that the Klingons went in to a period of isolation from the foudning of the federation to the battle of binary stars, when the Lit verse had a whole number of incursions with the Klingons in that time. Just read one with Robert April having a skirmish with some Klingons..
Anyway, if there is a continuity issue, it's no worse than the one that's existed for decades with regard to the Romulans. TNG: "The Neutral Zone" said there'd been no contact with the Romulans since the Tomed incident 53 years earlier -- but that was mere weeks after "Angel One" had referenced a Romulan fleet buildup on the border, and then over the years we learned of Romulan activities during that period like the attack on Narendra III.
Well, there's never been as cohesive or unified a 23rd-century novel continuity as there is for the post-series 24th-century stuff. There are series like Vanguard and Seekers, but mostly the TOS novels are treated as standalones with optional continuity.
Besides, DSC quickly walked back that "no contact in 100 years" line in the premiere episode by mentioning the Battle of Donatu V in the second episode -- and of course it was built into Burnham's backstory that she'd lived through (IIRC) two different Klingon raids during that "no contact" period. There were raids and battles during that time, but no formal diplomatic contact between the governments.
Anyway, if there is a continuity issue, it's no worse than the one that's existed for decades with regard to the Romulans. TNG: "The Neutral Zone" said there'd been no contact with the Romulans since the Tomed incident 53 years earlier -- but that was mere weeks after "Angel One" had referenced a Romulan fleet buildup on the border, and then over the years we learned of Romulan activities during that period like the attack on Narendra III.
I was a bit puzzled by that line in Discovery myself. 100 years seemed a bit of a long time for no contact with the Klingons. After all that would take us basically to the final season of Enterprise. I always thought that was a bit of a mistake.
And I was hoping they were going to show the Battle of Donatu V on the show, but apparently it already happened. I know one of the novels, I think by Ryan, covered the battle. But it was a battle referenced in the original series I thought for sure would be covered by Discovery.
In fact, if it were exactly 100 years, that would be 2156, the year after ENT's final season. So there's no inconsistency. And the actual line was "We've had only fleeting run-ins with them for a century," which could easily be rounded up from 90-ish years, since round numbers uttered in conversation can't be assumed to be mathematically precise. In Live By the Code, I have the Klingons begin a period of seclusion in 2165, 91 years before DSC, which is close enough. And "fleeting run-ins" does leave room for individual encounters here and there, as long as they aren't too frequent or extended.
Wrong timeframe. It was 23 years before "Tribbles," which would be 2245. For whatever reason, DSC's makers wanted it to be 2256.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.