Pal, you REALLY need to start paying attention to who you're talking to. You've replied to others as though they were me, and to me as though I'm someone else. NOT true.STARTREK11 said:
said:
I SAID:-
You comments about aircraft having folded wings makes no sense as all they had to do is do is park every ALTERNATE aircraft on a ramp such that the wings stack/slide over each
each adjacent plane's wings.Using this method you would get higher aircraft density,then with folding wings.
This must be military intelligence in action having planes with folding wings.Totally unnecessary.
CULTCROSS SAID:-
"The folding wings are a much more sensible solution than stacking them on a ramp over each other () and I think you know that. It would only take the ship to move slightly on choppy seas and planes stacked wing over wing would be causing damage to each other. Plus the folding wings make manoeuvring on hanger deck lifts easier. They wouldn't have come up with the idea if fixed wing planes could do the same thing - they already had fixed wing planes".
...SAYS CULTCROSS ABOVE.
To which I Reply.
But in your previous post you said folding wings add weight and complexity,now you say it's better to have them.
The choppy seas argument is absurd as all the planes would be effected equally,just because they are a few feet of the deck on a ramp would not effect them any more.In any case they usually anchor them if that was the case.A carrier by necessity has to be a stable platform.
And the planes would not damage each other by scraping as adequate ramp height clearance would ensure that.
I expect confirmation any moment from my source about the plot point mentioned above.
Stay tuned.
Folding wings adds complexity. It reduces onboard fuel capacity. And in the VERY FIRST aircraft carriers, they didn't have them.
The first carrier-based aircraft with folding wings gave the carriers the ability to carry many more aircraft on the same ship. Each aircraft was slightly less capable than their land-based variant would be, but the overall effect was to dramatically increase the capacity of the CARRIER. The net change was gain, in other words.
It's also worth pointing out that, despite you apparently not "getting" it, that the wings in flight ARE TOTALLY STABLE AND FIXED. THEY ARE LOCKED INTO PLACE. THEY ARE NOT "BENDY HINGY FLAPPY" THINGS!
I know, you're either (1) tweaking us to see how far you can push the group, or (2) simply totally clueless, yet came up with something you thought would be "kewl" and now are offended that we don't seem to like your kewl new idea. But replying can be entertaining. I keep hoping that you'll eventually "click" and start GETTING what you're being told. There are a lot of folks here who know a LOT about what we're talking about. I'm not the only one, not by a long shot. You have yet to explain who you are or what you do or what your level of education, knowledge and training is, on the topics you claim to be able to discuss intelligently.
Oh, and you also haven't tossed us that "major plot point spoiler" yet. We're all still waiting on that one, too.
