Critiscim of "fans disliking something" generally refers to things that the general audience doesn't give a flying fuck about - things relating to "canon."
Discovery hasn't come out yet. It's presumptuous to even bring up such a defense.
I think there's an undercurrent in this debate that suggests that fans have unfairly high standards.
With no other information available to the public, presumably CBS has contracted (or is in the process of contracting) with a public VFX outfit, such as ILM, to provide the necessary visuals.And who is taking over? What now? Is this good or bad?
My comment is perfectly relevant for all the idiots attempting to crucify the show before the first episode even aired yet.Discovery hasn't come out yet. It's presumptuous to even bring up such a defense. Regardless of how much Discovery has been presold and may or may not be cancelation-proof for the next year or two (something that has more to do with whether executives want to gamble on it) general audiences may wind up bashing Discovery for some of the same reasons fans do. They probably won't care about the minutiae of canon, but they may dislike the production design purely on its aesthetics.
I think there's an undercurrent in this debate that suggests that fans have unfairly high standards and the general public have really low standards, and that the objectively "right" way to think about things is to set the bar really low. If the average viewer is so easy to please, though, nothing would ever bomb or get canceled. Nobody right now can classify Discovery as a "good show" yet. Most of the concerns fans have about it are based on things that are perfectly justified: shakeups at the top, delays, and now letting their FX team go en masse.
They also specifically said they were "re-imagining" Star Trek for the 21st century.They were free to choose any year, and they were free to set it in the Kelvin Universe or reboot it as a fresh universe. But they said it set in Prime Universe at specific year. Like it or not, it is understandable that this creates certain expectations amongst the fans.
They also specifically said they were "re-imagining" Star Trek for the 21st century.
Frankly, I have really not seen anyone to do that here. We know really little about the show, so we end up having huge treads about the few parts we have seen. But then if someone says that they don't like some aspect (like the ship design or the look of the Klingons) it gets construed as them hating the entire show even though that was not what was said.My comment is perfectly relevant for all the idiots attempting to crucify the show before the first episode even aired yet.
????Frankly, I have really not seen anyone to do that here.
There have been plenty of people who said "oh the new Klingons don't cut it for me, i hope the rest of it looks better" and even more people who said "That's not what klingons are supposed to look like! This show will be awful! It's not canon!" etc. (Paraphrase of course). it happens to be that I'm not too thrilled with it either, no biggie.We know really little about the show, so we end up having huge treads about the few parts we have seen. But then if someone says that they don't like some aspect (like the ship design or the look of the Klingons) it gets construed as them hating the entire show even though that was not what was said.
Yes, plenty of people have said something like this, me included.There have been plenty of people who said "oh the new Klingons don't cut it for me, i hope the rest of it looks better" and even more people who said "That's not what klingons are supposed to look like!
But I really haven't seen much of this.This show will be awful!
Why is anyone bashing the show before it airs anyway? Why not wait until you see the actual pilot episode on CBS?"presumably CBS has contracted"
I just mentioned in my other post that this thread is full of presumptions. It's hypocritical to bash "idiots" for crucifying the show before it airs as well as to presume what CBS is doing to produce the FX.
Whatever is going on behind the scenes will eventually come out after the fact and we can bump these threads to see who was the more accurate clairvoyant in reading the tea leaves.
So, to get back on topic, the FX team for Discovery was indeed let go around a week ago. However, I do not know the particulars as why.
And who is taking over? What now? Is this good or bad?
Some supposed info has been posted on another forum from someone who claims to have interviewed to join the VFX team (but was not hired before the team was let go). I would link it, but it's a private board that isn't accessable unless you have an account. I can't verify this guy is legit so take with caution:
•The new VFX house is Pixamondo, chosen partially because of their prior work on the Abrams movies.
•The in-house team was unable to get much work done at all due to shifting deadlines, rewrites and redesigns.
•CBS decided that an outside vendor might be able to work more quickly than the in-house team.
•Said poster is of the opinion that this may be a bad idea as Pixamondo is primarily a feature film shop and is not used to dealing with the deadlines of series work.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.