• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

New Animated Show: Star Wars: Forces of Destiny

Reverend

Admiral
Admiral
OK, not a new show exactly, but a series of 3 minute youtube shorts featuring heroes from across all eras, from Padme & Ahsoka all the way to Maz & Rey. They're not saying it, but it's pretty clearly aimed at younger girls, which is interesting especially considering they haven't gone all "sparkly stars pink-zone" with it. It's actually quite refreshing in a way.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I have to say, for a franchise that's historically been criticised for being almost exclusively male, they suddenly appear to have a wealth of diverse and interesting cast of female leads. I feel this is no coincidence.

TLDR: technically this means more Clone Wars content and yes, Filloni appears to at least be supervising. Is it canon? Maybe? Probably not. Who cares?! ;)
 
Last edited:
I like the idea -- especially the chance of getting more Ahsoka stories. But the animation style in the Rey clip is annoying -- that cheap Flash animation stuff where the character movements are unnaturally jerky and bouncy and 2-dimensional.
 
Sounds pretty cool. I haven't watched Rebels but the rest of it sounds great. I'm especially excited about Maz's narration
 
Last edited:
I hope to see Maz Kanata in Rebels sometime. After all, she's 1000 years old. And Max Von Sydow's character (Lor San Tekka, IIRC) was introduced as an old friend of Leia/the Rebellion, so it would make sense for a younger version of him to show up in Rebels season 4.
 
Sounds like fun. It's nice to see so many "boys" franchises finally recognizing that girls can like them too, first with DC's Superhero Girls and now this.
 
Sounds like fun. It's nice to see so many "boys" franchises finally recognizing that girls can like them too, first with DC's Superhero Girls and now this.

Although it's great to appeal to female fans, we should also encourage the idea that boys are allowed to like female heroes too. These should be for everyone. I gather there's going to be a tie-in line of figures that are sort of halfway between conventional "dolls" and "action figures" in their features, so maybe that's an attempt to go for a less gender-segregated appeal and get both boys and girls to buy the same toys. Which would be a step in the right direction.
 
I'm glad to see this, just a shame that they didn't think of this when Rogue One was in Pre-Production, although the gender imbalance in that film and the previous films probably got them thinking.
 
Although it's great to appeal to female fans, we should also encourage the idea that boys are allowed to like female heroes too. These should be for everyone. I gather there's going to be a tie-in line of figures that are sort of halfway between conventional "dolls" and "action figures" in their features, so maybe that's an attempt to go for a less gender-segregated appeal and get both boys and girls to buy the same toys. Which would be a step in the right direction.
Oh yeah, I agree completely I'm a huge Wonder Woman fan, and to be honest it aggravates me how the majority her merchandise seem geared entirely to girls. Pretty much all of the Wonder Woman shirts I've seen are pink women/girls shirts, and the WW fabric we have at the Wal-Mart where I work is covered in pastel stars and rainbows. Even the toys we got for the movie is mostly Barbie style dolls. There are a few WW action figures, but nowhere near the number of figures for Batman or Superman, the other two members of the DC Trinity.
 
Although it's great to appeal to female fans, we should also encourage the idea that boys are allowed to like female heroes too. These should be for everyone. I gather there's going to be a tie-in line of figures that are sort of halfway between conventional "dolls" and "action figures" in their features, so maybe that's an attempt to go for a less gender-segregated appeal and get both boys and girls to buy the same toys. Which would be a step in the right direction.

I think most of that is in how they're presented. Like I said, this isn't all pink sparkles and rainbows, which I think is what usually repels most young boys (and some girls no doubt.) I think most will just see it as more Star Wars and will like or dislike it based more on the spaceships and lasers than the gender of the characters.

Personally, as a child I never thought twice about owning several versions of Leia as an action figure (all four of them!) as well as Janine from Ghostbusters and both Teela & Evil-Lyn from He-Man. I would have loved an Arcee to go with my Hot Rod (pink or no pink dammit!), but they never made one so far as I know.
On the other hand, try to get a 'My Little Pony' or a Care Bear (even a male one) anywhere near eight year old me and I'd probably have run a mile.
 
I think most of that is in how they're presented. Like I said, this isn't all pink sparkles and rainbows, which I think is what usually repels most young boys (and some girls no doubt.)

Which is only because boys are socially conditioned to see "girly stuff" as beneath them, which is the fault of adults for teaching them misogyny. There's no intrinsic reason why boys should have anything against pink sparkles or rainbows. Hell, I like rainbows; rainbows are beautiful. Who doesn't like rainbows? And before WWII, clothing companies actually promoted pink as a masculine color and blue as a feminine one, because pink was a variant of red and was thus perceived as strong and aggressive, while blue was "cooler" and thus gentler. Which just goes to show how arbitrary and artificial these perceptions are.

Really, when I was a kid in the '70s, there were plenty of toys that were assumed to be fine for both boys and girls. I didn't want to play with my sister's dress-up dolls, and I don't think she was into my toy cars, but we played together with stuffed animals and Legos and Lincoln Logs and my Mego Star Trek toys and so forth. But by the '80s, toy companies and retailers were pushing distinct gender categories for toys harder than before, as some sort of outgrowth of merchandising logic that narrowly marketing products by demographic subgroup was better. I remember being offended that all the male villains She-Ra fought on her show were marketed as part of the He-Man toy line, with She-Ra and her female friends just being dress-up dolls with combable hair. It was ridiculous to think that She-Ra needed He-Man to fight her battles for her. Hell, She-Ra fought Skeletor's ex-boss! She was fighting evil an order of magnitude greater than He-Man had to worry about, and had no trouble holding her own. And her civilian identity was a resistance-army leader in her own right, not some pampered layabout prince.


I think most will just see it as more Star Wars and will like or dislike it based more on the spaceships and lasers than the gender of the characters.

I'd like to think they'd like it based on the personality of the characters. After all, stories about spaceships and lasers aren't that interesting if the people inside the spaceships and the causes they're firing lasers at each other for aren't interesting. And characters like Leia, Ahsoka, Sabine, Rey, and Jyn are popular because of their personalities, not their chromosomes. (Although I don't mind admitting that I appreciate how beautiful they all are.)
 
Oh yeah, I agree completely I'm a huge Wonder Woman fan, and to be honest it aggravates me how the majority her merchandise seem geared entirely to girls. Pretty much all of the Wonder Woman shirts I've seen are pink women/girls shirts, and the WW fabric we have at the Wal-Mart where I work is covered in pastel stars and rainbows. Even the toys we got for the movie is mostly Barbie style dolls. There are a few WW action figures, but nowhere near the number of figures for Batman or Superman, the other two members of the DC Trinity.
With the Wonder Woman movie, that is changing, at least from I have been seeing. My daughters have also been appreciating the variety of Black Widow figures too.
 
Yeah, now that it's gotten a bit more attention it's getting better, but it's still not gone.
 
I have to say, for a franchise that's historically been criticised for being almost exclusively male, they suddenly appear to have a wealth of diverse and interesting cast of female leads. I feel this is no coincidence.

It seemed odd to me that their wasn't any evidence of a Padme story being told. I'm sure she'll be represented, but her omission in the preview was curious.

A little disappointed that the Rey story appears to be taking place in between scenes of The Force Awakens. I suppose that they wanted to include BB-8 in the story, but I would have preferred a story of Rey's life before TFA.

TLDR: technically this means more Clone Wars content and yes, Filloni appears to at least be supervising. Is it canon? Maybe? Probably not. Who cares?! ;)

I assume that you're joking, but at the 30-second mark of the first video Filoni says the show is "very much a real part of Star Wars", and the article you linked to said, "Star Wars Forces of Destiny will remain true to the Star Wars canon".
 
It seemed odd to me that their wasn't any evidence of a Padme story being told. I'm sure she'll be represented, but her omission in the preview was curious.

She's there. As for why she's not in the preview: probably simply because the others are more popular just now with the demographic. Remember, Clone Wars was cancelled going on three or four years ago so many of those very young children they're trying to appeal to may not be as aware of her than they are of the others.
Mind you, I don't think Hera was there either, so perhaps it's more a matter of picking one per "era" to showcase? Or it may simply be that the Padme story isn't far enough along in the production pipeline for them to have anything to show? Indeed, most of what they did show was concept art and voiced storyboards.

A little disappointed that the Rey story appears to be taking place in between scenes of The Force Awakens. I suppose that they wanted to include BB-8 in the story, but I would have preferred a story of Rey's life before TFA.

There's still potential for that. If this show is just a series of 3 minute shorts there could be other Rey stories and there's very little unaccounted for time in TFA to play with, so a prologue isn't out of the question.

I actually just read the 'Before the Awakening' short story anthology just a few weeks ago and Rey's tale of refurbishing an old wreck of a freighter was by far the most enjoyable. I rather hope they'll adapt it, at least in part.

I assume that you're joking, but at the 30-second mark of the first video Filoni says the show is "very much a real part of Star Wars", and the article you linked to said, "Star Wars Forces of Destiny will remain true to the Star Wars canon".

You assume correctly. ;)
 
Fingers crossed Filoni uses the show to fill in a little of Ahsoka's lost time between TCW and Rebels. :)

Either way, looking forward to it. Hope it's good.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top