• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Nemesis or Wrath of Khan?

los2188

Commander
Red Shirt
I think most of us as Star Trek fans tend to agree that Wrath of Khan is the standard barer of what Star Trek should and can be when it comes to movies. Through all of the Trek movies, they are often compared to Wrath of Khan, but no one movie is compared the most to Wrath of Khan, other then Nemesis. It's often said that Nemesis was a last desperate attempt to recapture the magic that was Wrath of Khan due to similarities in Nemesis. With all of that being said, what if Wrath of Khan didn't exist (and the franchise continued to be as successful as it is..) OR Wrath of Khan was made after Nemesis...(let's just say the TNG era came first). My question is, would Nemesis have been more successful if there was no Wrath of Khan or if Nemesis came first?

I'm not quite as hard on Nemesis as most people can be. It had great potential, but I was VERY disappointed in the movie as a whole, but I liked it better than Insurrection, Final Frontier, and....wait for it......The Voyage Home (yes...The Voyage Home. Outside of some funny remarks, I've just never been a big fan of The Voyage Home). Nemesis could have been so much more though just like Generations. I often think that Generations could have been a cross between Yesterday's Enterprise and All Good Things.

P.S. I've recently discovered The Big Bang Theory over that past year. While I love sitcoms, I'm more of a fan of sitcoms of yesteryear like Seinfeld, Cheers, Frasier, etc. By circumstances, I've been having to watch The Big Bang Theory and I've come to love it. Does the constant Star Trek references in that show bother anyone or do you just love it?
 
I think most of us as Star Trek fans tend to agree that Wrath of Khan is the standard barer of what Star Trek should and can be when it comes to movies. Through all of the Trek movies, they are often compared to Wrath of Khan, but no one movie is compared the most to Wrath of Khan, other then Nemesis. It's often said that Nemesis was a last desperate attempt to recapture the magic that was Wrath of Khan due to similarities in Nemesis. With all of that being said, what if Wrath of Khan didn't exist (and the franchise continued to be as successful as it is..) OR Wrath of Khan was made after Nemesis...(let's just say the TNG era came first). My question is, would Nemesis have been more successful if there was no Wrath of Khan or if Nemesis came first?

I'm not quite as hard on Nemesis as most people can be. It had great potential, but I was VERY disappointed in the movie as a whole, but I liked it better than Insurrection, Final Frontier, and....wait for it......The Voyage Home (yes...The Voyage Home. Outside of some funny remarks, I've just never been a big fan of The Voyage Home). Nemesis could have been so much more though just like Generations. I often think that Generations could have been a cross between Yesterday's Enterprise and All Good Things.

P.S. I've recently discovered The Big Bang Theory over that past year. While I love sitcoms, I'm more of a fan of sitcoms of yesteryear like Seinfeld, Cheers, Frasier, etc. By circumstances, I've been having to watch The Big Bang Theory and I've come to love it. Does the constant Star Trek references in that show bother anyone or do you just love it?


Well I don't think it matters when, where, how or why the two films were made TWOK is a better film in pretty much every metric there is period.

I will grant you that I think Nemesis gets a worse rap then it deserves at times. First I think Insurrection was SUCH a disappointment that the mainstream just didn't have it in them for another TNG film, even though Nemesis is far superior to INS.

Second I think even TNG fans were tired at this point at seeing basically the 4 straight film to feature the wacky adventures of Picard and Data and Jean-Luc Picard action hero.

I think Nemesis would been more successful if it had been released earlier in the series. But as far as measuring up to TWOK...they're not even in the same league and it has nothing to do as to when it was made.
 
P.S. I've recently discovered The Big Bang Theory over that past year. While I love sitcoms, I'm more of a fan of sitcoms of yesteryear like Seinfeld, Cheers, Frasier, etc. By circumstances, I've been having to watch The Big Bang Theory and I've come to love it. Does the constant Star Trek references in that show bother anyone or do you just love it?

Big Bang Theory is a hoot. Why would the Star Trek references bother anyone? They're part of the fun.
 
I think most of us as Star Trek fans tend to agree that Wrath of Khan is the standard barer of what Star Trek should and can be when it comes to movies. Through all of the Trek movies, they are often compared to Wrath of Khan, but no one movie is compared the most to Wrath of Khan, other then Nemesis. It's often said that Nemesis was a last desperate attempt to recapture the magic that was Wrath of Khan due to similarities in Nemesis. With all of that being said, what if Wrath of Khan didn't exist (and the franchise continued to be as successful as it is..) OR Wrath of Khan was made after Nemesis...(let's just say the TNG era came first). My question is, would Nemesis have been more successful if there was no Wrath of Khan or if Nemesis came first?

I'm not quite as hard on Nemesis as most people can be. It had great potential, but I was VERY disappointed in the movie as a whole, but I liked it better than Insurrection, Final Frontier, and....wait for it......The Voyage Home (yes...The Voyage Home. Outside of some funny remarks, I've just never been a big fan of The Voyage Home). Nemesis could have been so much more though just like Generations. I often think that Generations could have been a cross between Yesterday's Enterprise and All Good Things.

TWOK had an antagonist who was from an episode of the original series, and played by a very well-known actor with a good motivation for his actions, at a time when Star Trek was very popular. Nemesis's protagonist was simply made up for the movie and played by some relatively unknown young actor who was failing to convince the audience that he was supposed to be the protagonists' twin, and whose motivations were vague at best, at a time when people were sick of Star Trek. Just these point right here makes TWOK superior.

P.S. I've recently discovered The Big Bang Theory over that past year. While I love sitcoms, I'm more of a fan of sitcoms of yesteryear like Seinfeld, Cheers, Frasier, etc. By circumstances, I've been having to watch The Big Bang Theory and I've come to love it. Does the constant Star Trek references in that show bother anyone or do you just love it?
The references never bothered me at all.
 
The reason I brought up The Big Bang Theory is because, let's be honest, the show centers around nerds and geeks, Penny notwithstanding, and they all love Star Trek. It kind of makes a slight inference that Star Trek fans tend to be nerds and geeks, no?? By the way I am a big Trek fan, and I'm not afraid to admit that so it doesn't bother me, but I was just wondering if it bothered anyone else.
 
In the interests of full disclosure, I think all of the TOS movies are pretty good with the exception of 'V'. I love TMP and TWOK, but I don't like the TNG movies very much.

I do, however, like Nemesis about as much as First Contact, they're the best of the four TNG films.

Big Bang Theory ? YMMV, but I love it.

Help me tiny Spock...
 
I have no real problems with Nemesis, and rate it above First Contact and Insurrection. It's the most space opera-y of the Star Trek films, and I'm not sure that's a terrible thing. The only thing I'd change is Picard driving the Warthog; it's an action sequence for the sake of having an action sequence. But overall, I enjoy the film, and I don't see it as Picard's Wrath of Khan.
 
Don't forget Rock Paper Scissors Lizard Spock!
Scissors cuts Paper, Paper covers Rock, Rock crushes Lizard, Lizard poisons Spock, Spock smashes Scissors, Scissors decapitates Lizard, Lizard eats Paper, Paper disproves Spock
Spock vaporizes Rock, and as it always has Rock crushes scissors. ;)
 
I'm more annoyed that TWOK gets held up as a 'standard bearer'.

Sure it's a great movie. It may very well be be Star Trek's best. But the shadow it cast created an unrealistic expectation that a whole bunch of the later movies must live up to. Nemesis certainly suffered from this need to 'be' TWOK, on some level, and the two Abrams movies have evidently been influenced by it too (perhaps even to a detriment.)
 
Interesting. I see very little in common between the films.

TWOK had "Space Seed" that it referred back to and a well fleshed-out villain whose motivations were entirely personal. The script was tightly focused.

Nemesis referred back to nothing and the first half is a sit-and-tell synopsis of a plot that is frankly half-baked at best. The second half is a space battle that's numbing, total overkill. I also thought that the Remans were ridiculous. Nemesis would have been better had it focused on a legit change of power in the Romulan Government (Re-enter Spock, even?) and which would have involved the Federation against the "Old Guard" of the Romulan empire.
 
It isn't so much things being "refered back to", as it was the plot beats themselves being a carbon copy of the original.

I forget who it was (might have been Redlettermedia in his "review"), but I do recall seeing a side-by-side comparison somewhere on youtube, and thinking "Yeah... they nailed it."

I'm not saying "villain with a tragic past who is out for VENGEANCE" can't be done in Star Trek movies. But the moment they do, they're setting themselves up for a curb stomp battle against TWOK. ;)
 
I will grant you that I think Nemesis gets a worse rap then it deserves at times. First I think Insurrection was SUCH a disappointment that the mainstream just didn't have it in them for another TNG film, even though Nemesis is far superior to INS.

Second I think even TNG fans were tired at this point at seeing basically the 4 straight film to feature the wacky adventures of Picard and Data and Jean-Luc Picard action hero.

I think Nemesis would been more successful if it had been released earlier in the series. But as far as measuring up to TWOK...they're not even in the same league and it has nothing to do as to when it was made.
I agree with all this.

I think the resemblance of NEM to TWOK has been overstated. In each film the captain has a deadly enemy (or nemesis, if you will), and in the end there's a space battle and a doomsday weapon. But there's no Genesis project and no prior history between the protagonists in NEM, and TWOK doesn't explore Romulan or any other alien culture. NEM also has a very different feel, with more darkness and intrigue. Khan is a warrior and tactician; Shinzon is a spy and a political revolutionary.

I like NEM, except that it really bogs down from around the 80 minute mark. I think it's because they keep interrupting the big battle to show Riker's not-very-interesting fight below decks. Also, the big scene of Shinzon's death and Data's self-sacrifice was bungled. Even if these problems were fixed, I couldn't quite put it at the level of TWOK, which isn't perfect but has a number of magical moments which stem from casting chemistry.
 
I like both Star Treks II and X equally these days.

Sure, I was pretty much on the hate bandwagon when Star Trek X was first released, but several years and rewatches later, the stuff I had issues with earlier seemed more from just a longtime Trekkie point of view. As I've gotten older, I've become less critical or nitpicky about various Trek movies and shows I guess.
 
It kind of makes a slight inference that Star Trek fans tend to be nerds and geeks, no??
I'll say it out loud: I'm a NERD and I'm proud! :techman:

It has been a horrible period for our society when being *smart* was a reason to be tormented and ostracized. I believe I see it fading away with my daughter's generation, and I thank Zarquon for it.

Honestly, a good HALF of both Nemesis and TWOK are dreadfully dull - the former because of writing, the latter because of pacing (which, to be fair, was typical for the time the movie was made). For me, comparing the two comes down to this:

TWOK:
Villain - silly, over the top, excellent actor sold it.
Spock's death - touching, well-written, well acted.
Space combat - fairly dull for most of it.
Command codes - too dumbed down, and I thought so even then when I was 7.

Nemesis:
Villain - needed lessons from Monteban. Played a ridiculous role *straight*, which may have been on the actor or on direction. But BAD.
Data's death - failed to move due to introducing an obvious out in the form of B4.
Space combat - Nemesis wins this one. Picard RAMMED a ship. :D
Remans - Can die in a fire. Let's just flatly contradict Diane Duane's excellent novels - not for a good reason, but for SPACE VAMPIRES!!!!1!!one!!

So overall, I give TWOK the win between the two. And even if TWOK had never existed (ignoring the butterfly effect that would have had), I'd feel the same way about Nemesis that I do now, only I'd be comparing Shinzon to Kruge (and still finding him wanting).
 
I wasn't aware that Nemesis was the one movie that was compared most to TWOK.

In any case, if I were to compare the two, it would be easy for me to say that Nemesis pales badly in comparison to TWOK. In addition to some of the technical aspects of the two movies that other have already mentioned, there is something magical about TOS and its characters that I don't find in TNG. It's an intangible advantage that TOS has over TNG.

Also, Khan was a badass whereas Shinzon was a wimpy Picard wannabe. Kirk vs Khan was infinitely more compelling than the Picard - Shinzon psychobabble.

But of the four TNG movies, Nemesis is the best of the bunch. I give it a slight edge over First Contact. The Romulans are much more interesting than the Borgs.

I agree with Memory Alpha that NEM might have been better if it had a greater focus on internal Romulan politics and Romulan/Reman society. I liked the scenes in the Roman Senate chamber.
 
I agree with Memory Alpha that NEM might have been better if it had a greater focus on internal Romulan politics and Romulan/Reman society. I liked the scenes in the Roman Senate chamber.
It needed a little of this (minus that Reman bit ;) ), at least a cameo from Denise Crosby as Sela, and a LOT of Patrick Stewart as accelerated clone Shinzon acting completely berzerk. :D
 
Also, Khan's motivations are not only revenge, he really believes that he's the better man. That drives him.

Shinzon needs a transfusion of some sort and wants to destroy Earth. Okay.

I'm not saying "villain with a tragic past who is out for VENGEANCE" can't be done in Star Trek movies. But the moment they do, they're setting themselves up for a curb stomp battle against TWOK. ;)

Yeah, and a lot of that is Montalban. Over the years I've come to realize that while he goes over the top, it's just a great, iconic performance. It's risky to go over the top, but when it works, it really works.

Although there was a bit too much "mwahaha," TNG did a good revenge plot with the Bok character. There wasn't time in the two episodes he was in to go into his character's mental makeup, but it could have gone that way.
 
I think Nemesis is the best of the four NextGen films. But that really isn't saying much.
 
It kind of makes a slight inference that Star Trek fans tend to be nerds and geeks, no??
I'll say it out loud: I'm a NERD and I'm proud! :techman:

It has been a horrible period for our society when being *smart* was a reason to be tormented and ostracized. I believe I see it fading away with my daughter's generation, and I thank Zarquon for it.

Honestly, a good HALF of both Nemesis and TWOK are dreadfully dull - the former because of writing, the latter because of pacing (which, to be fair, was typical for the time the movie was made). For me, comparing the two comes down to this:

TWOK:
Villain - silly, over the top, excellent actor sold it.
Spock's death - touching, well-written, well acted.
Space combat - fairly dull for most of it.
Command codes - too dumbed down, and I thought so even then when I was 7.

Nemesis:
Villain - needed lessons from Monteban. Played a ridiculous role *straight*, which may have been on the actor or on direction. But BAD.
Data's death - failed to move due to introducing an obvious out in the form of B4.
Space combat - Nemesis wins this one. Picard RAMMED a ship. :D
Remans - Can die in a fire. Let's just flatly contradict Diane Duane's excellent novels - not for a good reason, but for SPACE VAMPIRES!!!!1!!one!!

So overall, I give TWOK the win between the two. And even if TWOK had never existed (ignoring the butterfly effect that would have had), I'd feel the same way about Nemesis that I do now, only I'd be comparing Shinzon to Kruge (and still finding him wanting).

Well I respect your feelings but I have to say I STRONGLY disagree about the space battles.

I think that the battles in TWOK were extremely well and intense despite the fact there was not actually a whole lot of firing going on.

First was the tension.....I think it's awesome how they build up the initial approach between the Enterprise and Reliant. Kirk realized something is not quite right, but Reliant is still a sister starfleet vessel so he's hesitant to take any drastic action.....Not raising the shields as a precaution though was pretty inexcusable.

Khan on the other hand is all cocky and confident and brimming with joy with the fact that the Enterprise doesn't apparently know what to do and he's soon going to unleash his fury.

So the Reliant attacks with devastating results. Khan gloats and thinks he's about to win until Kirk uses his experience and superior knowledge of starships to confuse Reliant into lowering her shields (BTW the prefix code and computers of the same fleet being able to issue conflicting orders was a BRILLIANT piece of writing....despite the fact the code was only 5 numbers) and allowing the Enterprise to retaliate enough to drive Reliant away.

Then when they meet up again Khan realizes he's been tricked and the Enterprise is in better shape then he thought, but is almost excited at that prospect because he can prolong the agony. The Enterprise heads into the nebula because by doing so they'll negate most of the advantages the less damages Reliant has over her.

Jochaim realizes what they're up to and tells Khan it would be a terrible idea to follow them in. But when Khan hears Kirk's voice openly taunting him his emotions overrule his intellect and he takes the bait. So many of the computer and electronic elements are now out of play and it's man vs. man and skill vs. skill.

So they're in the nebula searching for each other. Enterprise gets in good firing position but misses, the two ships almost collide and exchange fire. Reliant's destroying one or the Enterprise's photon launchers and reopening earlier damage in the engine room and Enterprise's shot hitting Reliant square in the bridge killing Jochaim and many of the bridge crew.

Then when Kirk is trying to plan his next move Spock points out that Khan's attack seem to be based like he's fighting on land and not using the up and down element. Kirk drops the Enterprise below where he anticipates Reliant will fly over and raises up behind her.

And the shot where you see the Reliant's roll bar and the Enterprise start to slowly rise is AWESOME!!!!! It's almost like Jaws sneaking up on its prey and then when they show the Enterprise fully risen it's such a heroic looking shot, and you can almost hear the Enterprise say "Surprise Motherfucker!!!!!" and you know what's about to happen and then of course the Enterprise polishes the Reliant off blowing a warp nacelle to hell...all of course which leads up to the Genesis countdown.

But in Nemesis there was no real build up. The Scimitar just decloaks and Picard is like "Holy Shit" but they don't fight. Even when they do fight there is no real tension, because of faulty communications in a nebula Picard some deduces the Scimitar is about to attack seconds before it does. Then the ships fly around like fighter jets firing dozens and dozens of shots at each other for what seems like 30 minutes, but not really causing any major damage (except to the romulan ships) until they run out of ammo and are at a standoff. The ramming is pretty cool but it doesn't win the battle like the Enterprise's last shots at the Reliant did.

Remember these are large starships that are supposed to move at a slower rate. It's not the Millennium Falcon being chased by TIE Fighters firing endlessly and the Falcon doing fast and nimble manuvers to try and escape.

TWOK showed the ships like they are. They weren't chasing each other like a couple of fighter jets, they were like battleships exchanging gunfire. And though the actual amount of shots fired was far less than Nemesis, each hit actually caused significant damage and changed the nature of the battle.

In Nemesis they just flew around fast and aimlessly and, despite the much greater degree of gunfire exchanges, didn't really seem to damage the other very much except for the bridge shaking and sparks coming down from the ceiling.

To me this falls into the "Less is more" category. It's not so much about the amount of fire exchanged, but the tension and drama around the fight and what the fire that is exchanged does.

It's the exact same reason why the lightsaber battle in The Empire Strikes Back creams any one in the prequels. Because light saber fights are not about how many times you swing at each other and how fancy the moves are....it's about the drama surrounding the fight. In ESB there was intense drama...in the prequels it was just clearly choreographed swings done as quickly and fancy as possible.....It didn't really matter who was fighting.

Sorry Nemesis loses big in the space battle category IMHO, despite the superior SFX. Because it lacked so much of what made the battles in TWOK intense even they weren't shooting at each other every 5 seconds.
 
It isn't so much things being "refered back to", as it was the plot beats themselves being a carbon copy of the original.

I forget who it was (might have been Redlettermedia in his "review"), but I do recall seeing a side-by-side comparison somewhere on youtube, and thinking "Yeah... they nailed it."

I'm not saying "villain with a tragic past who is out for VENGEANCE" can't be done in Star Trek movies. But the moment they do, they're setting themselves up for a curb stomp battle against TWOK. ;)


It was the Plinkett / Redlettermedia review, and they were 100% correct in exposing the boldfaced ripoff NEM was, not only in EFX sequences, but in character arcs / motivations. The public was just as aware of the rip as RLM, so it is no surprise the film was trashed, then dismissed.

There's no honor or sense in the "steal from the best" approach taken in NEM. They needed to stop stealing altogether.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top