• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Nebula vs. Galaxy

I do have a couple of questions about the Nebula, though.

(1) Given the 440m length of the Nebula-class, what are the dimensions of both pods?

(2) Is there a forward torpedo tube in the engineering hull right above the main deflector dish? I remember a Nebula in "Star Trek:First Contact" firing on a Borg cube thusly, but I don't know if there's enough room between the bottom of the primary hull and the top of the main deflector dish for a torpedo tube.
 
1/ I don't recall the exact volume of the pods, but they're actually not all that large.

2. This is one of those VFX oddities I think we should put up there with a phaser coming out of the Galaxy class torpedo launcher. Since the connecting area between the saucer and engineering hull doesn't really have a location fit for a torpedo launcher, and so far as I can tell the First Contact Nebula is actually the physical model version (rather than the CGI one), it looks like a VFX blunder to me. (Note this is true of most of that battle scene, since there's weird scaling issues with the Sabre class, and the Akira fires torpedoes from where it doesn't actually have any launchers.)
 
On the rest of your theory, Sic, I think part of it is simply that the Nebula while sharing many of the same structural frames of the Galaxy clearly seem to be using inferior internal components. It might be akin to building with merely cutting edge technology vs. with bleeding edge technology and as a result having to use more of the internal volume in efficient ways compared to the Galaxy. Throughout TNG's run, we kind of got the impression that a lot of Galaxy class systems were somewhat over complicated or untested, up to and including the warp core. It may simply be that as a "workhorse" design, the Nebula is designed with less of the flash bang, and thus doesn't have as much internal volume to use, and thus had to make use of things like external pods.
 
The pods look like they have more volume than an Oberth in its entirety. Perhaps even a Nova-class. But do we know their dimensions?

We'll chalk the torpedo tube scene up to VFX blunders, then. Canon purists can argue differently, but I don't see space for one.

What is wrong with the Saber scaling? How big is it supposed to be?

I thought I had read a blurb in the TNG Tech Manual regarding the internal volume of the Galaxy primary hull was something like 35% free space? If so, there should still be plenty of room for extras even in the Nebula, I would think. Earlier, less gee-whiz components than the Galaxy, yes; inferior components, no. And being the next newest design down from the then state-of-the-art Galaxy, I would think Starfleet would work diligently at correcting any such flaws, especially if they're the workhorses of the fleet.

Do we know from episodes or Trek lit if the Nebula has saucer separation capability? I am inclined to think it doesn't...rather, certainly it has an emergency separation function, but I don't think it has an easy disconnect/reconnect like the Galaxy does.
 
Well, as noted above, the Galaxy has about 30% more internal volume over the Nebula pod included. So basically a Nebula that has been fully fitted out would have about the same payload volume as a standard 35% volume empty Galaxy. The pod's are about 170m x 280m x 20m. Lazily assuming they're triangular gives us a volume of about 476,000 m³. Which is big. It's about 2 Mirandas, or half an Excelsior.
 
Galaxy has 30% more internal volume than Nebula, pod included? All due respect, but that figure seems to me to be a bit off, at first glance. I know the engineering hull is shorter than that of Galaxy, but it doesn't seem THAT much shorter. And most of the part that seems to be missing on the Nebula but exists on the Galaxy appears to be the wide, flat parts that support the nacelles as well as the flaring part of the neck that, while sizable, doesn't seem to me to make up the 30%. Also, Nebula's pod, while not very tall, is still pretty damned big and the pod supporting strut (at least on the tac pod variants...have never gotten a close look at the sensor pod supports of the Phoenix-type variant), and those two structures (pod and support pylon) would, I think, go a long way in making up a volume shortage vis-a-vis Galaxy.

The Starship Spotter book of 2001 mentions that Nebula has a cargo pod and a probe pod in addition to a tactical pod and sensor pod...have we seen any of those variants? I am also thinking that such pods can't be too much taller than the tactical and sensor versions, or else they'd interfere with the ship's warp bubble.

(Starship Spotter gives 3,309,000 tons displacement for Nebula and 4,500,000 tons for Galaxy, making Nebula 73.53% the volume of Galaxy...nonetheless, given those stats, looking at side/top/bottom/front/back views of both types, I still don't see THAT significant of a volume difference. What am I doing wrong?)
 
It just came to my attention that the Nebula Class and the several other ships at Wolf 359 couldn't take down a cube while the Galaxy Class alone finished the job.
 
It just came to my attention that the Nebula Class and the several other ships at Wolf 359 couldn't take down a cube while the Galaxy Class alone finished the job.

You mean Picard and Data finished the job by hacking the Borg, all the Enterprise did is provide equipment for the hacking and prepare for a likely to be ineffective suicide run.
 
It just came to my attention that the Nebula Class and the several other ships at Wolf 359 couldn't take down a cube while the Galaxy Class alone finished the job.

You mean Picard and Data finished the job by hacking the Borg, all the Enterprise did is provide equipment for the hacking and prepare for a likely to be ineffective suicide run.

True it was more the crew than the ship on that one but the Nebula Class couldn't have pulled off that saucer separation diversionary tactic on it's own.
 
It just came to my attention that the Nebula Class and the several other ships at Wolf 359 couldn't take down a cube while the Galaxy Class alone finished the job.

You mean Picard and Data finished the job by hacking the Borg, all the Enterprise did is provide equipment for the hacking and prepare for a likely to be ineffective suicide run.

True it was more the crew than the ship on that one but the Nebula Class couldn't have pulled off that saucer separation diversionary tactic on it's own.
A Nebula and an Ambassador could have if the Enterprise crew had been on one of them.
 
From 20 mins of looking at pics and stats it seams that the nebula was designed to be more efficient and use more tried and tested tech than the galaxy. That coupled with the compact interiors and variability of the pods make it ideally suited to a fast reaction ship, capable of been sent on any kind of mission be it combat, humanitarian or scientific anywhere in sf controlled space. it seams to be a good ship with a nice service record standing against the Borg Cardassians Klingon and any others (if it has some main character backup!;))
and the Galaxy was designed for long term space exploration to quote 'to explore strange new worlds and seek out new civilisations' and generally go gallivanting about uncharted space without backup or need to resupply hence the 30 odd % extra space.
 
Despite many similar hull components with the Galaxy, I envisioned the Nebula-class to have some substantially different interior arrangements. Whereas the Galaxy was designed with long-term space exploration of the Federation's frontiers in mind, with a duration of several years between necessary resupply, it would seem to me that the Nebula was designed to provide defensive and exploratory services largely within the boundaries of the Federation itself. Of course, it would have complete capabilities to serve in a wider galactic exploratory role as the Galaxy does, but I don't see that as the primary intended role of the Nebula.

Unless there's other variants of the mission pod that I haven't seen, I am thinking that there are two separate versions of the Nebula...the triangular pod, denoting a dedicated combat version (henceforth, Combat-Nebula), and the oval pod, indicating a dedicated explorer and science version (Sensor-Nebula). Mission pods are interchangeable between the two variants, of course, but the internal fittings of each ship make the best match when fitted with its intended pod type. Since we've seen many more triangular pod-equipped Nebulas than oval pod ones, I tend to think there are significantly many more Combat-Nebulas in service than Sensor-Nebulas, and I don't think we've ever seen a Sensor-Nebula engaged in combat outside of TNG's "The Wounded". And since both Nebula designs have separate primary functions as I see it, it stands to reason that the interiors of the ships have been constructed to more fully support those specific missions, and of substantially shorter intended duration than the Galaxy, as opposed to the spacious quarters and family-friendly multiple amenities and catch-alls of a multi-year explorer. Out go things like the Arboretum and a mega-sized shuttle bay (at least in the earlier versions; it would appear that the Bonchune CGI has one) and multiple impulse engines for saucer separation (as well as all of the volume-consuming apparatus involved with a now-unnecessary saucer sep capability, like docking latches and overlapping structural integrity field generators); in go items like more torpedo magazines, phaser strip crystal fabrication facilities, troop quarters for a wartime footing, and more sizable cargo bays. The capacious primary hull of a Nebula of either type would have plenty of room to ferry citizens, colony settlers, and cargo across the length and breadth of the Federation with great economy as Nebulas go about their concerns, especially if the hull did not have to have multiple science labs and sensor emplacements and support of same like the Galaxy does. Additionally, a less specialized primary hull with more cargo space and less "busy" than a Galaxy's requirements would be easier, faster, and cheaper to fabricate, and might serve as an in-universe explanation for the lack of window rows and other visual differences from the Galaxy-class as seen on early Nebulas.

If the Galaxy is a "let's see what's out there" ship, the Nebula is a "now that we know what's out there, here's the ship to deal with it most efficiently" ship.

Combat-Nebulas, I perceive, take advantage of their less-than-Galaxy size to create a smaller, stronger shield envelope than a Galaxy would have from the same sized warp core, and hence would likely be able to stand up to stronger punishment than a Galaxy against the same foe. A dedicated mission pod with multiple torpedo launchers (and there's plenty of room in the pod for a dozen launchers and thousands of photon torpedoes) would be complemented by additional torpedo magazines and other combat-support facilities within the primary and engineering hulls, as stated above. Combat-Nebulas on patrol at key trouble spots within a few weeks or months of the nearest Starbase could, in principle, remain at the ready nearly indefinitely, being relieved by another Combat-Nebula as is needed to return to a Starbase for resupply, crew rest/replacement, and other things. Additionally, a high cargo/passenger capacity would be of great value moving things around within the Federation, along with the defensive capabilities to protect them.

Sensor-Nebulas, though few in number, could be sent on missions of longer duration (though not as long as the intended duration of the Galaxy-class) to places of scientific interest within the Federation (and outside it, with sufficient tactical back-up...). Places like the Dyson Sphere and other anomalies that require more scrutiny that might be outside the capabilities of Oberth- and Nova-class explorer and science ships, or places that a more widely-ranging Galaxy-class might discover and then move along once a Sensor-Nebula shows up or is enroute to the new discovery. Dedicated science labs and analysis facilities would take up excess space used for other functions in the Galaxy-class, though things like the Arboretum and a large (or even expanded, into the interior of the primary hull...) shuttle bay may be retained. Sensor-Nebula also retains capable offensive systems, though not as expansive as that of a Combat-Nebula, making it a better choice than an Oberth- or Nova-class for in-depth scrutiny missions outside Federation space or close to known threats; in that vein, I can certainly see a Sensor-Nebula testing new stuff in the proximity of the Romulan Neutral Zone, for example. Likewise the Combat-Nebula, large passenger facilities and cargo bays may make the Sensor-Nebula a busy enough workhorse for the needs of the Federation when mysteries to be studied are few and far between.


Agree with just about all of the above, though I'd point out there are at least three known major variants (upgrade modifications aside), including one with a smaller, spare set of nacelles atop the very aft saucer IIRC.
 
When it comes to combat, it has to be said that even though Nebula has smaller shield envelope, Galaxy has two extra impulse engines which can be used by shields.
 
Good point, although the tactical pod could potentially feature extra fusion generators to provide a "complete package"...
 
What was the purpose of the Nebula with the two small warp nacelles atop the primary hull? I didn't think Nebula was equipped with saucer-sep capability, so it doesn't make sense to have those nacelles there, at least in some kind of in-universe explanation. And, yes, Blip, I think the tactical pod would have extra fusion generators, though I think they'd more support the shield envelope rather than route to the impulse engines.
 
More nacelles doesn't necessarily mean more speed, despite what Prometheus fans will tell you. And the wrong-sized nacelles just looked...wrong. Just because.
 
And, yes, Blip, I think the tactical pod would have extra fusion generators, though I think they'd more support the shield envelope rather than route to the impulse engines.

That's precisely what I was saying.

There'd be no point to sticking impulse drives up top so far away from the centre of mass anyway IMO, even if they aren't a conventional thrust propulsion.
 
I know that it's not a true basis for judging something, but I always preferred the Galaxy Class over the other similar designs of the day.
To me, the Nebula just looks like a Galaxy that's squatting down to pick up a penny.
 
Didn't they convert the rear end of the torpedo pods of the Reliants in DS9 to have extra impulse engines during the Dominion War? Those top pods could very well be additional engines for maneuvering because the ship got too heavy from additional equipment being added internally...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top