name me one 3-D movie ever made in which the 3-D is actually necessary to understanding the plot of the film, or is a major element of the storytelling.
I haven't seen one yet. It's cool as hell. But necessary? I don't think so.
name me one 3-D movie ever made in which the 3-D is actually necessary to understanding the plot of the film, or is a major element of the storytelling.
Not quite sure I'm following you here. I may have phrased my post badly. Or a little more cynically than intended.
Especially given that I don't recall the last time I went to see a movie and spent my time walking around the theater to see different parts of the movie.
Don't worry, I wasn't arguing that you should have to do that.
I was just illustrating the point that current 3D still isn't "all that", by giving an example of something that would be a truly major leap in 3D tech. What we have now may have evolved a little beyond red-and-green glasses, but it's still just forced stereoscopic vision (as Yoda puts it). As such, it doesn't strike me as particularly revolutionary or interesting. I don't know if ultimately it will prove to be just a fad, but it wouldn't surprise me.
Funny, I could have sworn I posted a lot of that speech already, and now I can't find it!
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw[/yt]
I mean, that kind of window effect can be done, it's just not that interesting in the context of a movie (and this obviously wouldn't work in a theater full of people), though yeah, it wouldn't really be perfect since the content isn't really like 3D content in a video game, though I'm sure with some trickery it wouldn't look bad. But the stereoscopic stuff seems clearly more immersive than that kind of optical illusion. I would think that the Avatars of the world would probably work best with some kind of LCD glasses/headgear that blocks out everything else from your sight.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.