Re: My TOS shuttelcraft (continued)...
All right, folks, bear with me here.
There is a tiny voice in the back of my head lamenting,
“Why in hell did I ever try to undertake this?” By “this” the voice is referring to trying to depict the between hulls mechanical guts of the shuttlecraft. Why didn’t I just grey those sections out and label them as “classified” like Franz Joseph did in his
Star Fleet Technical Manual? Well, I felt ambitious and challenged by the idea that this would put my drawings on another level and offer a degree of realism not often seen in illustrations of SF hardware.
Nevertheless I feel committed to doing it as planned, but I feel forced to backtrack a little because I’m not wholly satisfied with my cross sections to date. I’m content for the most part with what I’ve fashioned in the aft section, but the rest forward of that leaves me somewhat disappointed. To that end I feel compelled to start again with a partially clean sheet. By partially I mean I’m going to keep what I’ve rendered in regards to the cabin layout and detail as well as the stuff aft of the cabin (the impulse drive and assorted mechanicals in that section), but forward of that I need to start again.
Here is my reasoning:
Firstly I’ll begin by drawing up the life shell or inner hull. This will be what the ship looks like stripped of outer hull and structural framework or spaceframe as I like to call it. This will be, effectively, a viable lifeboat or life sustainable spacecraft except that it lacks any means of propulsion. It has sufficient power to sustain life support, communications, limited sensors and computer systems yet that power would be wholly insufficient to power any drive systems. This seems somewhat consistent with Scotty’s assertion that the “batteries” would be insufficient to power the ship for lift-off.
Next I’ll render the spaceframe that will provide additional structural support for the life shell as will as serve for the supporting framework for the outer hull. The spaceframe is also what many of the guts aftwards as well as the impulse drive are attached to.
What this process will do is give me a much better idea of what should be visible between hulls in my cross sections as well as deck and ceiling plans. I see this as rather painstaking, but I also think that if you’re going to do something then it’s worth doing right to the best of one’s ability.
For the most part I have to do this only once because there will be little variation between the innards of the Class F and H ships so I can pretty well just cut and paste the detailing over. But there are some differences:
- the Class H has five large ion thrusters as opposed to the F’s eight smaller ones.
- the Class H has one large interactive viewscreen as opposed to the F’s three smaller ones.
- the Class H’s gangway swings further down to the ground with fold out steps as opposed to the F’s gangway lowering onto its port nacelle.
- the Class H has one larger navigational deflector as opposed the F’s two smaller ones.
Once this project is complete I hope to go on to rendering other
Star Trek projects, but I hasten to emphasize that I seriously doubt I’ll ever get this detailed with those. I’m particularly keen an tackling the TAS shuttlecraft, a Pike era shuttlecraft and the Pike era E.
The Pike era shuttlecraft could actually be done in concert with the
E because it could be part of something like a Cage era reference manual, including uniforms which are something I already have drawn up from some years ago. I have something of a fascination with the Pike era
E with its larger bridge dome, spiked engine domes and distinctive looking bridge. I’ve even toyed with the vague idea of rendering a Pike era
E as if it were being done today, although it would be far removed from what’s been glimpsed for Trek XI and more evocative of the original design. But one thing at a time.
Just a thought.