• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

My DS9 Rewatch Odyssey

Oh...I never picked up that Talak’talan was Third, but that does raise some questions. I think, as someone reasoned, the real reason is the writers hadn’t quite worked out the Jem’Hadar hierarchy worked or the fact they operate in units. Maybe they intended this to be Third in command of all Jem’Hadar,

The writers really do love their apostrophes when naming aliens, huh? Apostrophes imply an abbreviation, so technically we could assume the Jem’Hadar are actually called the Jem’HodopodoHadar. Of course, the writers really just use the apostrophe to look cool, but I think it’s kinda funny.
 
I've gotten the sense that apostrophes in names are used to indicate brief pauses in the pronunciation, much like commas are typically used with regards to sentences.

Goa'uld should be pronounced as Teal'c pronounces it ("Goa-uld"), not as Jack pronounces it ("Gould").

We do have apostrophes in contemporary English names in any case. O'Malley, for instance.
 
I've gotten the sense that apostrophes in names are used to indicate brief pauses in the pronunciation, much like commas are typically used with regards to sentences.

That’s true, there are some instances where it can help indicate pronunciation...I’m thinking an example would be T’Rul in “The Search” (Tee-rool rather than Trool!)

Goa'uld should be pronounced as Teal'c pronounces it ("Goa-uld"), not as Jack pronounces it ("Gould").

I always found it funny the way Jack had his own pronunciation for “Gould”. Maybe Richard Dean Anderson had some clause in his contract where he could use whatever pronunciations he wanted and no one was allowed to correct him :)

We do have apostrophes in contemporary English names in any case. O'Malley, for instance.

Well, the apostrophes in Irish names such as those are an abbreviation for “Of”, as in “descended from”. So, the name O’Brien, for instance, actually means “Of Brien”/“son of Brien”.

Trek’s use of apostrophes is often arbitrary and just to look cool. One that bothered me was B’Elanna Torres, because the apostrophe was so redundant. Why not just spell it Belanna? Anyway, who cares I guess.
 
“THE SEARCH, PART I”

411256.jpg

So whaddyou do when the Gamma Quadrant inhabitants literally turn out to be dickheads?

Hello season three! I remember quite vividly when the third season began. Living in the UK, I relied upon the VHS releases to keep up to date with Star Trek, and the third season releases began around February 1995. When TNG ended I expected to miss it greatly as that was the first Trek I got to knew and love, but, surprisingly, I didn’t miss it as much as I expected. I guess the fact Generations had just been released helped, plus the fact that I found season seven pretty disappointing on the whole. More importantly, this was around the time I really grew to love DS9. I’d already fallen for its characters and the excitement around the start of the third season really captured me and, as fate would have it, the series would only go from strength to strength and cement itself as my favourite Trek show, along with TOS.

Set three months after the game-changing second season finale, “The Search” confronts the Dominion head-on, and is a gripping and dramatic start to the season. There is, however, a distinct sense that the Paramount executives had mandated a re-tooling for the show. A large part of the audience clearly wasn’t keen on Bajoran politics, which are henceforth put on the back-burner, and there seems to be a distinct assurance that, like Trek past and future, DS9 was also capable of “boldly going”. (Although, surprisingly, Rick Berman was actually opposed to the introduction of the Defiant, and this was something that new showrunner Ira Behr pushed for). There’s also a conscious attempt to beef up Sisko’s character, making him more passionate about his mission and more comfortable in his role, finally seeing “this Cardassian monstrosity” as his home. To be fair, the character of Sisko had not been well served through most of season one and two (the only primary Sisko episode since the pilot being the dismal “Second Sight), although he did have a number of wonderful moments scattered throughout.

thesearch1_6.jpg

Sisko: The man, the myth, the interior decorator!

I loved the Defiant from the moment I saw it, as well as its eye-popping pew-pew phasers. The story takes a while to get moving, but the character vignettes lacing the episode’s first half are nicely done. We meet the Romulan T’Rul, who doesn’t really make much of an impression other than being pretty rude, and, more importantly, Starfleet security officer Michael Eddington, who only really gets a brief introduction—and from the moment I saw him smile I somehow didn’t trust him one bit. Dax gets a new hairstyle which looks pretty terrible and is a crime against Terry Farrell, one of Star Trek’s most beautiful stars. Thankfully, it would only last another episode before the hairstyling department came to their senses (or were fired!).

I do have issues with the crew’s assignment to enter the Gamma Quadrant and locate the Founders of the Dominion. Starfleet’s response to the Dominion crisis seems...lacking. (Did Sisko have to contend with with a younger Admiral Clancy—aka Admiral Foul Mouth from Picard—at Starfleet Command?)

They lost a Galaxy Class starship, and their response? Assign ONE ship—one with noted design problems—and send the administrators of the nearest Starfleet outpost to undertake one of the most IMPORTANT diplomatic negotiations in all the Federation’s history. Obviously, there were no trained diplomats available? Sisko and his crew are certainly not trained in diplomacy and it makes no sense that they were sent on this vital mission other than they’re the series leads and the story dictates it. It’s also never explained who exactly runs the station in their absence. This is where it would have made much more sense if we’d had a starship like the Odyssey assigned to DS9 on a regular basis, with its crew as recurring characters liaising with the DS9 crew. In fact, shouldn’t Starfleet have sent a small fleet of ships to guard the wormhole? At this point in the series, frustratingly, the establishing shots of the station almost always make it look deserted, with not a ship to be seen.

But, this is Star Trek, and there are a number of threads you simply shouldn’t start tugging at or any number of things begin unravelling. The fact is, the mission makes for exciting viewing, even though I wasn’t really convinced by Sisko’s readiness to leave behind Dax and O’Brien. There are some tense near-confrontations with the Jem’Hadar culminating in one of the most brutal and chaotic ship-under-siege sequences we’ve ever seen. Excellent directing makes for a thrilling climax, with Sisko particularly impressive as he fights to defends his ship. That alone would have made for an excellent cliff-hanger, but the episode goes one better.

Admittedly this wasn’t Odo’s best episode. I’m sure that most will sympathise with his being muscled out by Starfleet, but his behaviour is rather bratty, unprofessional and selfish—to the extent that he jumps at the chance to abandon the Defiant with evidently no concern about the fate of his fellow crew. The implication would seem to be that, upon catching sight of the Omarion nebula, some kind of influence has overpowered him, causing him to act uncharacteristically. This, of course, leads to one of my favourite Star Trek cliff-hangers of all time, one that felt appropriately fairytale-like and one that would forever change the direction of the series. Those magical final seconds alone are worth the price of admission. Rating: 8
 
Trek’s use of apostrophes is often arbitrary and just to look cool. One that bothered me was B’Elanna Torres, because the apostrophe was so redundant. Why not just spell it Belanna? Anyway, who cares I guess.
Apostrophes should be used as glottal stops. As written, the B in B'Elanna should be somewhat isolated from the rest of the name.
 
there seems to be a distinct assurance that, like Trek past and future, DS9 was also capable of “boldly going”. (Although, surprisingly, Rick Berman was actually opposed to the introduction of the Defiant, and this was something that new showrunner Ira Behr pushed for).
I don't always agree that introducing the Defiant meant shifting the focus of the show back to what was typically Star Trek. Yes, they could go more places, but they weren't doing all the things in Star Trek's famous monologue. Or, as Behr put it, the Defiant was on "a five year mission to kick ass:" not doing the strange new worlds thing or anything else. Considering how prominent the Defiant would be, the runabouts were used a surprising amount, especially when it came to the more science-y stuff. Moreover, things on the Defiant were still cramped, even when compared to the runabouts.A few extra pounds would make it difficult to walk through the corridors.

(For the record, the impetus for getting the Defiant was the insufficiency of the runabout sets. They were too difficult to film more than two people. After that, the producers decided to exploit the need as best as possible.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kkt
Once TPTB introduced the Dominion with the clear implication that they could pop through the wormhole at any moment, I don't really see how there was any choice other than to have at least one ship regularly available at DS9, if not several...for evac purposes if nothing else. Certainly at this point in the series nobody thought the station stood a chance against a Jem'hadar attack.
 
Once TPTB introduced the Dominion with the clear implication that they could pop through the wormhole at any moment, I don't really see how there was any choice other than to have at least one ship regularly available at DS9, if not several...for evac purposes if nothing else. Certainly at this point in the series nobody thought the station stood a chance against a Jem'hadar attack.

For evac, you'd want a ship much bigger than the Defiant.
 
That does remind me of one tiny quibble I had with a phenomal, and one of my all time davorite, episodes.

In "CALL TO ARMS", after they activate the minefield, Sisko orders the evaciation of the station. Even if it's just Starfleet personnel, and using all runabouts, how can it fit ALL of them? By that time, there had to be a huge number of Starfleet people and their families there.
 
That does remind me of one tiny quibble I had with a phenomal, and one of my all time davorite, episodes.

In "CALL TO ARMS", after they activate the minefield, Sisko orders the evaciation of the station. Even if it's just Starfleet personnel, and using all runabouts, how can it fit ALL of them? By that time, there had to be a huge number of Starfleet people and their families there.

Maybe ships from Bajor took a lot of them and put them in a refugee settlement until Starfleet could pick them up.
 
Memory Alpha lists DS9 having five runabouts at the end of the series, which I think would be a decent estimate for the usual compliment. They never say how many passengers one could carry, but it seems like 50 is a safe bet, considering The Circle trilogy and Paradise. Indeed, if it can be converted into a passenger configuration, it probably could hold 100 passengers, being that it is slightly shorter but significantly wider than an Embraer regional jet. I could see them evacuating a good number of Starfleet officers.
 
This sentence could be written about at least 50% of Star Trek episodes.

True, although there are instances where it stands out more than others. I have a particular issue when our crew are sent on undercover missions when Starfleet would surely have highly trained, better qualified undercover operatives for the job. In this case, they could have at least assigned a high-ranking Starfleet diplomat to the mission, as we often saw in TOS.

At least until you remember that Ferengi females are pretty much slaves...

Um, yeah, when you put it like that...
 
  • Like
Reactions: amp
“THE SEARCH, PART II”

Picture-1014.png

You make me all gooey inside. Literally.

I’ve always had mixed feelings about this episode. On the one hand, there are some excellent moments and it’s a pivotal episode in the show’s ongoing narrative. But it also feels like ever such a little bit of a cheat. After all, what’s more frustrating for the viewer than writing yourself out of a difficult situation by making it “all just a dream”?

Let’s start off with the station side of things. This episode feels strangely disconnected from the first part and the way we suddenly find ourselves back on DS9 seems weak. Pretty much all the station scenes felt “off” to me somehow, which, to begin with, I assumed was perhaps down to weak writing and directing. In retrospect, this works because these scenes DO feel appropriately dreamlike, and it explains nagging discrepancies and a strange lack of grounding.

The twist is either brilliant or a huge cop-out depending on your perspective. For me, it’s a bit of both. I’ve never been a fan of those “all in the mind” episodes that DS9 was especially fond of. It is, ultimately, a cheat, unless the audience is clued into things at an earlier stage. The premise can be used well, but this is no INCEPTION. That said, it does make sense that the Dominion would want to test the waters before making a strike against the Alpha Quadrant, and what better way to interrogate your prisoners than to keep them oblivious to the fact they’re being interrogated? The Dominion is insidious and, in many ways, this strategy makes a lot of sense.

I just feel that, as the climax of our first real Dominion storyline (with this two-parter and “The Jem’Hadar” comprising a trilogy) it feels a bit weak dramatically. If I recall, I did kind of groan when I first realised that this was basically a Bobby Ewing in the shower moment. It also doesn’t make much sense that the Vorta would be conducting this brain simulation experiment on the Founders’ homeworld. I mean, the Dominion is a vast empire with likely countless planets, bases and outposts, so why would the Founders want Vorta bringing prisoners to their planet, when they clearly hate solids and prize their seclusion?

Of course, that’s a necessary concession to dovetail the two storylines, which initially felt annoyingly disconnected. The final five minutes of this episode are brilliant, and the twist that Odo’s people are the Founders is one of the best moves the writers ever made, and opens up a whole universe of story possibilities as well as providing excellent character conflict for an already troubled character. Rene Auberjonois is superb throughout, and Salome Jens is perfectly cast as the female Changeling. She’s got a strangely maternal, sensual quality, but also an aloofness, coldness and quite chilling streak, as we witness as the end. Some of the scenes on the planet work wonderfully, although some drag a little and the set itself doesn’t quite work. In fact, I felt it was one of Trek’s most unconvincing planet sets since TOS. I wonder if that’s why they cranked the lighting down so low? Sadly, the result is a visually murky episode.

But in spite of my reservations, when the episode is good, it’s really good, and the final scenes are perfectly done: shocking, unnerving and emotional, and Auberjonois sells Odo’s heartache beautifully. I also love how supportive Kira is throughout, and their friendship is a real joy to witness. Overall, this isn’t an unqualified success as an ending to this trilogy, but it is an important episode and one that will have significant repercussions for the rest of the show’s run. Rating: 7
 
I actually predicted the Changelings were the Founders as soon as they appeared at the end of the first part when it initially aired. I was so proud of myself, 15 year old me.

This was a great setup for Odo's arc for the rest of the series.

And I do agree that the station scenes in the second part feel off, but I think that was by design. There's always little clues, like on TNG, if it was all in someone's head, every scene that does take place there you never see an exterior shot of the Enterprise.

I did find it odd that the Founders had them interrogated on their world when I was younger, but on other rewatches and as I got older, it actually makes for a couple reasons.

First, they were likely not far away from the Omarion Nebula, and that could have been the closest base for them to go to. Second, the fact that Odo and Kira even made it there in the shuttle suggests the Jem'Hadar detected Odo's lifesigns and allowed them to land. And given that Odo was on board the Defiant to begin with, I suspect the Female Changeling was doing her own version of interrogation with Odo at the same time the Vorta was working on the crew. She even later sort of admits this when in "HEART OF STONE" she tells Odo she suspected his decision to not stay was because of Kira.

The biggest best kept secret scene I took away from this episode on rewatches is the exchange between Sisko and mental Garak. "Mr. Garak, I had no idea we thought so much alike." This scene, I feel, really set the tone and stage for Sisko working with him in "IN THE PALE MOONLIGHT". Obviously, we would never really think this until you see the entire series over again, but that's one of the great joys of DS9. Even after many rewatches and years later, you can always get something new from the show.

And by the way... I always loved the Defiant. She was such a badass.
 
I just feel that, as the climax of our first real Dominion storyline (with this two-parter and “The Jem’Hadar” comprising a trilogy) it feels a bit weak dramatically. If I recall, I did kind of groan when I first realised that this was basically a Bobby Ewing in the shower moment. It also doesn’t make much sense that the Vorta would be conducting this brain simulation experiment on the Founders’ homeworld. I mean, the Dominion is a vast empire with likely countless planets, bases and outposts, so why would the Founders want Vorta bringing prisoners to their planet, when they clearly hate solids and prize their seclusion?
True, it does bring the episode down. However, I think it works for the series in general, allowing the characters to make a quick and direct connection between Odo and the Founders. IIANM, Piller wanted to drag out the "who are the founders" angle for at least a year. I am glad that didn't happen. Personally, I dislike this type of forced drama, like "who are the final five?" on Battlestar Galactica. Instead, Odo went straight away to re-evaluating his character, knowing that being a changeling meant both entertaining different forms but also inheriting a legacy of authoritarianism.
 
I actually predicted the Changelings were the Founders as soon as they appeared at the end of the first part when it initially aired. I was so proud of myself, 15 year old me.

Cool, we’re the same age! Back then, none of my friends liked Star Trek and I had no one to discuss it with, which is why it’s nice to have this place and you guys now.

And I do agree that the station scenes in the second part feel off, but I think that was by design. There's always little clues, like on TNG, if it was all in someone's head, every scene that does take place there you never see an exterior shot of the Enterprise.

It’s amazing how lack of exterior shots can affect the feel of an episode. The station scenes feel weird, insular and almost uncomfortable,which is actually quite appropriate and effective upon rewatching.

I did find it odd that the Founders had them interrogated on their world when I was younger, but on other rewatches and as I got older, it actually makes for a couple reasons.

First, they were likely not far away from the Omarion Nebula, and that could have been the closest base for them to go to. Second, the fact that Odo and Kira even made it there in the shuttle suggests the Jem'Hadar detected Odo's lifesigns and allowed them to land. And given that Odo was on board the Defiant to begin with, I suspect the Female Changeling was doing her own version of interrogation with Odo at the same time the Vorta was working on the crew. She even later sort of admits this when in "HEART OF STONE" she tells Odo she suspected his decision to not stay was because of Kira.

I would have thought they’d have been hidden bases around the planet, for security purposes. It seems odd the Founders wouldn’t want the Jem’Hadar nearby for defensive purposes. That said, I still think it’s unlikely they’d want to share the planet with Vorta and Jem’Hadar, however, especially given the contempt and distaste they treat their underlings with. But, it’s a detail I can accept for the power of the twist.

The biggest best kept secret scene I took away from this episode on rewatches is the exchange between Sisko and mental Garak. "Mr. Garak, I had no idea we thought so much alike." This scene, I feel, really set the tone and stage for Sisko working with him in "IN THE PALE MOONLIGHT". Obviously, we would never really think this until you see the entire series over again, but that's one of the great joys of DS9. Even after many rewatches and years later, you can always get something new from the show.
Good catch! It does work as unintended retrospective foreshadowing.

And by the way... I always loved the Defiant. She was such a badass.
The Defiant is one of my absolute favourite ships.
 
True, it does bring the episode down. However, I think it works for the series in general, allowing the characters to make a quick and direct connection between Odo and the Founders. IIANM, Piller wanted to drag out the "who are the founders" angle for at least a year. I am glad that didn't happen. Personally, I dislike this type of forced drama, like "who are the final five?" on Battlestar Galactica. Instead, Odo went straight away to re-evaluating his character, knowing that being a changeling meant both entertaining different forms but also inheriting a legacy of authoritarianism.

I agree, I love the fact we got such an unexpectedly early meeting with Odo’s people (I think most of us initially assumed we probably wouldn’t encounter Odo’s people until the tail end of the series, if at all), AND the reveal that they were the Founders. Quite often when they drag these things out it can either lose its momentum or end up anticlimactic (as I think BSG’s “final five” was, from what I recall).
 
I actually don't find it odd that Vorta and Jem'Hadar are stationed on their planet at once. They both revere the Founders as gods, so that may be the one thing they put all their disdain aside for.

If a Changeling appeared to a group of bickering Vorta and Jem'Hadar, calls himself Zod and says "Kneel before Zod", they will drop all their arguments and kneel.

At the end of the day, the Founders don't care about their underlings bickering. They only care about their obedience.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top