MUTAI SHO RIN IS A JERK MOD!

[Cyclist]

MUTAI SHO-RIN SHOULD NOT BE A MOD!

I got back on the BBS just to inform other posters. I was on awhile back under the screenname 'Stellla's_Funboy' and posted a thread that Mutai made a snarky comment about. I guess he thought I should take things around here more seriously. a 'non-serious' thread is NOT against policy therefore his comment was taken as made by him as 'him' and not as a 'mod'. when I fired back that someone who calls himself 'Mutai Sho-Rin online has no business counseling others on issues of taking things seriously, he 'booted' me. HE BOOTED ME FOR PERSONAL REASONS, NOT BBS POLICY!

Now Mutai, you can 'boot me' again. the title gives you reason.

I will be back.

To haunt you.

 

[RedShirtNoob]

 

[Trekker4747]

I got back on the BBS just to inform other posters. I was on awhile back under the screenname 'Stellla's_Funboy' and posted a thread that Mutai made a snarky comment about. I guess he thought I should take things around here more seriously. a 'non-serious' thread is NOT against policy therefore his comment was taken as made by him as 'him' and not as a 'mod'. when I fired back that someone who calls himself 'Mutai Sho-Rin online has no business counseling others on issues of taking things seriously, he 'booted' me. HE BOOTED ME FOR PERSONAL REASONS, NOT BBS POLICY!

Now Mutai, you can 'boot me' again. the title gives you reason.

I will be back.

To haunt you.

You weren't booted for starting "non-serious" threads. You were booted for starting multiple threads and not putting any content in the OP. That's called spamming which is not allowed under board rules.

 

[Forbin]

In before the lo...

 

[Methos]

M

 

[MANT!]

 

[Rowdy Roddy McDowall]

Methos' avatar is cute.

 

[Cyclist]

I got back on the BBS just to inform other posters. I was on awhile back under the screenname 'Stellla's_Funboy' and posted a thread that Mutai made a snarky comment about. I guess he thought I should take things around here more seriously. a 'non-serious' thread is NOT against policy therefore his comment was taken as made by him as 'him' and not as a 'mod'. when I fired back that someone who calls himself 'Mutai Sho-Rin online has no business counseling others on issues of taking things seriously, he 'booted' me. HE BOOTED ME FOR PERSONAL REASONS, NOT BBS POLICY!

Now Mutai, you can 'boot me' again. the title gives you reason.

I will be back.

To haunt you.

You weren't booted for starting "non-serious" threads. You were booted for starting multiple threads and not putting any content in the OP. That's called spamming which is not allowed under board rules.

Wrong. Posting two succesive lighthearted threads in succession does not 'spam' make. Besides, If I was booted for spamming, I would have never been around to see his response. He booted me for showing him how silly he looked.

Lastly, If I was willing to 'spam' at that time in jest, wouldn't I be MORE willing to 'spam' now in retribution? Logical.

 

[Cyclist]

M

Now that was hilarious! Well done!

 

[Lord Garth]

My indirect successor is a great mod. T'Bonz couldn't have picked a better choice, and I'm glad he got a second chance to be a moderator on the board after the raw deal that was the ENT forum.

 

[bbailey861]

In before the big X.

 

[Sindatur]

<SIGH>

 

[Trekker4747]

I got back on the BBS just to inform other posters. I was on awhile back under the screenname 'Stellla's_Funboy' and posted a thread that Mutai made a snarky comment about. I guess he thought I should take things around here more seriously. a 'non-serious' thread is NOT against policy therefore his comment was taken as made by him as 'him' and not as a 'mod'. when I fired back that someone who calls himself 'Mutai Sho-Rin online has no business counseling others on issues of taking things seriously, he 'booted' me. HE BOOTED ME FOR PERSONAL REASONS, NOT BBS POLICY!

Now Mutai, you can 'boot me' again. the title gives you reason.

I will be back.

To haunt you.

You weren't booted for starting "non-serious" threads. You were booted for starting multiple threads and not putting any content in the OP. That's called spamming which is not allowed under board rules.

Wrong. Posting two succesive lighthearted threads in succession does not 'spam' make. Besides, If I was booted for spamming, I would have never been around to see his response. He booted me for showing him how silly he looked.

Lastly, If I was willing to 'spam' at that time in jest, wouldn't I be MORE willing to 'spam' now in retribution? Logical.

You posted threads without any content in the OP.

 

[Mistral]

Empty thread, empty head, eh? I've seen that syndrome before.

 

[Cyclist]

You weren't booted for starting "non-serious" threads. You were booted for starting multiple threads and not putting any content in the OP. That's called spamming which is not allowed under board rules.

Wrong. Posting two succesive lighthearted threads in succession does not 'spam' make. Besides, If I was booted for spamming, I would have never been around to see his response. He booted me for showing him how silly he looked.

Lastly, If I was willing to 'spam' at that time in jest, wouldn't I be MORE willing to 'spam' now in retribution? Logical.

You posted threads without any content in the OP.

You couldn't address the logic behind the 'spam then/spam now' point so you repeated yourself...

 

[GNDN]

Lastly, If I was willing to 'spam' at that time in jest, wouldn't I be MORE willing to 'spam' now in retribution? Logical.

Flawlessly logical. As evidenced by this spammy thread

Oh, and TITS

 

[Trekker4747]

Didn't say you were intentionally spamming then, just saying why they said you were spamming. You created several threads all of them with an OP that didn't start any kind of discussion. Were you banned quickly without much warning? Perhaps. But, still, you created multiple threads without any content to them.

That's spamming. Not to say you were intentionally spamming to create trouble but it is what you were apparently doing.

 

[Cyclist]

Didn't say you were intentionally spamming then, just saying why they said you were spamming. You created several threads all of them with an OP that didn't start any kind of discussion. Were you banned quickly without much warning? Perhaps. But, still, you created multiple threads without any content to them.

That's spamming. Not to say you were intentionally spamming to create trouble but it is what you were apparently doing.

Fair enough. Smooches.

 

[controlfreak]

I really have nothing to say, I just wanted to be part of something.

 

[GNDN]

I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you.