Absolutely sad news. Shocking what small group of people want to do a country that is quite happy with it's religion.
Which is why I'm thankful President Bush has kept us safe for the past 7 years and hope the next president can do the same.Latest news is a huge explosion in one of the hotels. This is just so awful. What with this and travellers trapped in Bangkok airport, the world is a scary, scary place.
So...what are you saying? What these people "go through" means it's okay for them to do whatever they like? And if uninvolved people are killed simply because they happened to be there at the time, what their killers "go through" makes it okay? Does this "logic" apply to all acts of terrorism, or are there special criteria that make some more acceptable than others?Sorry Orac, not picking on you but this is an overly simplistic way of looking at the situation. It isn't just some cause. It's -- difficult to explain but it's also difficult to understand what these people go through.Yet more lives wasted in the name of some "cause". Appalling.
The likely* cause that those terrorists espouse is not going to get the sympathy of any sane person, anyway. They probably know that, hence the violence. Fear is the only way to (theoretically) change anyone's minds and make them acquiesce to a viewpoint with which they find disgusting. Fundamentally, that is why terrorism exists in the first place. If you have an argument that can draw sympathy on its own merits, why would you need to resort to violence and fear?There have to be better ways to get the world's attention. No cause is worth a human life.
You'd be giving them exactly what they want: martyrdom and an excuse to recruit more young idiots to pull shit like this.I really want to see the terrorists who have been captured marched into a public street and shot. That is the only thing I think that may come close to avenging their actions.
They are indoctrinated in certain beliefs, such as the notion that human lives are irrelevant and God is all that matters, so killing in the name of God is not only okay but actually a good thing to do, and will get you into heaven. Many of these young idiots probably do live in poverty, in violent cultures that extol mindless obedience to authority and denegrate the value of human life, and whose acts of violence simply spur their enemies to commit violence in return (such as the suggestion for public executions quoted above) in an eternal vicious cycle.So...what are you saying? What these people "go through" means it's okay for them to do whatever they like? And if uninvolved people are killed simply because they happened to be there at the time, what their killers "go through" makes it okay? Does this "logic" apply to all acts of terrorism, or are there special criteria that make some more acceptable than others?
Mumbai is probably one of the most cosmopolitan and secular cities in Asia. We're predominantly Hindu but it is a huge melting pot of culture and people, definitely more so than the rest of India.Absolutely sad news. Shocking what small group of people want to do a country that is quite happy with it's religion.
I thought you said it was a vicious cycle. They don't come more expendable. For each terrorist who dies there's another 2 in training. They have channels for recruitment. Schools and camps. I agree they shouldn't be granted their martyrdom so easily.So their lives are pretty bleak and hideous by our standards and I feel sorry for them, but it wouldn't stop me from putting a bullet in their brains if I had a chance, just to mitigate the amount of future damage they would do. It's like killing a rattlesnake in your backyard; it may not be "fair" but it has to be done.
This is a very good post. Sums it up nicely. I have nothing to add, except this: tonight at dinner one of my relatives declared that this is all happening because "the Muslims hate us (Americans)." I tried to explain that a. not all Muslims hate Americans. Gee, some Muslims are Americans; b. we're seeing radicalism here, which is never wholly representative; and c. this might be something to do with Kashmir separatism (I don't know for sure, I can't make it out from the somewhat sketchy news reports) or the India/Pakistan relationship. My cousins didn't know what Kashmir was and thought I was saying that Al-Qaeda wanted to live in Kashmir (because, you see, ALL Muslims=terrorists=Al-Qaeda). One of my cousins kept referring to Muslims as a nationality. "We don't have radical Irish people coming over here!" she told me, "Or radical Autralians!" I had to explain to her that Islam is not a country, and that yes, we do actually have radicals from other faiths or ideologies who have killed. Most strikingly, they felt almost no empathy for the victims there (other than the Americans, of course).The likely* cause that those terrorists espouse is not going to get the sympathy of any sane person, anyway. They probably know that, hence the violence. Fear is the only way to (theoretically) change anyone's minds and make them acquiesce to a viewpoint with which they find disgusting. Fundamentally, that is why terrorism exists in the first place. If you have an argument that can draw sympathy on its own merits, why would you need to resort to violence and fear?There have to be better ways to get the world's attention. No cause is worth a human life.
*Looks like it's probably more of that horseshit over Kashmir, or the secular government in Pakistan, although I haven't heard any confirmation of what they're after. Those seem to be the usual beefs that involve India.
And since their cause is ultimately religiously based, they would very strongly disagree with the notion that it's not worth a human life. To them, it's worth the lives of every human alive today, who ever existed or ever will exist, because God is more important than them all combined. Which makes sense in a way, if you believe that 1) God created humans and 2) the only point of human existence is to worship God.
I'll give them credit for having an internally consistent belief system. The problem lies in outsiders not understanding what their belief system is. Even though Islamic terrorists have made reasonable attempts to communicate their ideals and goals, there is still a great deal of confusion about this. Pick up a book by Whalid Phares, that's a good place to start.
You'd be giving them exactly what they want: martyrdom and an excuse to recruit more young idiots to pull shit like this.I really want to see the terrorists who have been captured marched into a public street and shot. That is the only thing I think that may come close to avenging their actions.
They are indoctrinated in certain beliefs, such as the notion that human lives are irrelevant and God is all that matters, so killing in the name of God is not only okay but actually a good thing to do, and will get you into heaven. Many of these young idiots probably do live in poverty, in violent cultures that extol mindless obedience to authority and denegrate the value of human life, and whose acts of violence simply spur their enemies to commit violence in return (such as the suggestion for public executions quoted above) in an eternal vicious cycle.So...what are you saying? What these people "go through" means it's okay for them to do whatever they like? And if uninvolved people are killed simply because they happened to be there at the time, what their killers "go through" makes it okay? Does this "logic" apply to all acts of terrorism, or are there special criteria that make some more acceptable than others?
So their lives are pretty bleak and hideous by our standards and I feel sorry for them, but it wouldn't stop me from putting a bullet in their brains if I had a chance, just to mitigate the amount of future damage they would do. It's like killing a rattlesnake in your backyard; it may not be "fair" but it has to be done.
So...what are you saying? What these people "go through" means it's okay for them to do whatever they like? And if uninvolved people are killed simply because they happened to be there at the time, what their killers "go through" makes it okay? Does this "logic" apply to all acts of terrorism, or are there special criteria that make some more acceptable than others?Sorry Orac, not picking on you but this is an overly simplistic way of looking at the situation. It isn't just some cause. It's -- difficult to explain but it's also difficult to understand what these people go through.Yet more lives wasted in the name of some "cause". Appalling.
![]()
If mine is too "simplistic" a viewpoint for you, too bad. Beats the hell out of even appearing to try to justify acts like this.
We cannot keep creating more martyrs for them to rally behind. We need to start putting pressure on these governments to clean up corruption, to clean up the mismanagement and the problems with wealth distribution. We need to show that we are not only interested in helping Israel but also Palestine and the other areas.
Yet more lives wasted in the name of some "cause". Appalling.
Sorry Orac, not picking on you but this is an overly simplistic way of looking at the situation. It isn't just some cause. It's -- difficult to explain but it's also difficult to understand what these people go through.
Forgot to ask: Professor Zoom, any word yet on your friends living there?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.