^But the thing is, we don't know how many people in a position of power know about it. It doesn't have to be a vast conspiracy. I'm not claiming there are underground bases and retro-engineered spaceships, and government collusion, etc., but if the US government does know anything at all, it's possible it's only known to a very small number of people. Need to know only, the highest level of secrecy, maybe even the POTUS knows fuck all. It might just be "there are other beings here from some place else and we don't know what they want", and that's not a hard secret for a few hundred people to keep. Those that let it leak are immediately ridiculed, so who cares even if they do say anything?
It would take a real, concerted effort by people who are supposedly "in the know" to break the truth, if the truth is indeed what we're talking about. Something like the failed "Disclosure Project", a large mass of very credible people in the position to know who put their careers on the line and releasing verifiable evidence. If not direct evidence of visitors, direct evidence the US government still considers these unknown things a reality and not just Venus or a cloud obscuring the moon.
It's probably good for us that there is a "big secret" if indeed there is one. Like you said, if it was a dire situation, or if we knew they were hostile or that they had bad intentions or if we knew a lot about them or if the government was in cahoots with them in a massive conspiracy, someone or a group of people probably would have done something dramatic to show the truth. it's less likely that people who found out "the truth" would put their careers on the line if there isn't much available evidence to back them off, and they don't have the incentive if the only info is "the US government knows there are UFOs flying around the earth and we don't know what they are".
I know people think that it's impossible to keep a secret, but the beauty of this secret is that it's not. You say "completely unknown to the public" but we're talking about it right now! They can keep the small amount of hard evidence they may or may not have hidden, and anyone who does break the trust is dismissed as a loon. Look how quickly several ordinarily open-minded people in this thread (in a Star Trek forum at that) immediately went to "he's crazy and he's old" when this former astronaut makes these claims? If you don't believe him due to lack of evidence, that's fine, but what's with the ridicule?
I am not advocating the existence of ETs or spaceships or government involvement with aliens. For all we know it's a bunch of hog-wash. But I have a serious problem with this particular argument.
It would take a real, concerted effort by people who are supposedly "in the know" to break the truth, if the truth is indeed what we're talking about. Something like the failed "Disclosure Project", a large mass of very credible people in the position to know who put their careers on the line and releasing verifiable evidence. If not direct evidence of visitors, direct evidence the US government still considers these unknown things a reality and not just Venus or a cloud obscuring the moon.
It's probably good for us that there is a "big secret" if indeed there is one. Like you said, if it was a dire situation, or if we knew they were hostile or that they had bad intentions or if we knew a lot about them or if the government was in cahoots with them in a massive conspiracy, someone or a group of people probably would have done something dramatic to show the truth. it's less likely that people who found out "the truth" would put their careers on the line if there isn't much available evidence to back them off, and they don't have the incentive if the only info is "the US government knows there are UFOs flying around the earth and we don't know what they are".
I know people think that it's impossible to keep a secret, but the beauty of this secret is that it's not. You say "completely unknown to the public" but we're talking about it right now! They can keep the small amount of hard evidence they may or may not have hidden, and anyone who does break the trust is dismissed as a loon. Look how quickly several ordinarily open-minded people in this thread (in a Star Trek forum at that) immediately went to "he's crazy and he's old" when this former astronaut makes these claims? If you don't believe him due to lack of evidence, that's fine, but what's with the ridicule?
I am not advocating the existence of ETs or spaceships or government involvement with aliens. For all we know it's a bunch of hog-wash. But I have a serious problem with this particular argument.