^At my showing in Century City, there were CBS/Paramount reps who handed out posters to the kiddies (some adults snagged them as well). In fact, it seemed as if a lot of studio reps were at my showing.
rgb1701 said:
The digital projector they used in our venue had FAR too little resolution- it was at most a 1024x768 XGA projector- I counted and estimated the pixels, which were easily visible from our seats. My home Epson Cinema 400 puts out more resolution and contrast than what they used. I looked back at the projection booth, and saw they used a boardroom-style LCD projector, sitting next to the (what I assume was) the film projector. I was expecting a commercial grade DLP or DILA, or 1080p LCD.

The people were relatively "normal", again suggesting that old preconceptions of what most Trekkers are like aren't really valid in the real world.ST_Intergalactic said:
I'm going to the Livonia show on the 15th...and I think you just lowered my expectations. I'm not nearly as excited now.![]()

.rgb1701 said:
While I had fun watching Menagerie on a big public screen with other fans, I was disappointed with the "extras" and the technical presentation.
As far as I could tell, most of the "extras", except for Rodenberry's son, have been at
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Trek-Original...2461&sr=8-2
for weeks, which I watched weeks ago. Dingleberry, er, Son of Rodenberry, didn't say anything I hadn't heard before- he would have been interesting had he contributed new tidbits for us LONG time fans who've Heard It All.
The digital projector they used in our venue had FAR too little resolution- it was at most a 1024x768 XGA projector- I counted and estimated the pixels, which were easily visible from our seats. My home Epson Cinema 400 puts out more resolution and contrast than what they used. I looked back at the projection booth, and saw they used a boardroom-style LCD projector, sitting next to the (what I assume was) the film projector. I was expecting a commercial grade DLP or DILA, or 1080p LCD.
While the "remastered' FX were nice, the "restored" film elements were FAR from fully "cleaned up"- FAR too often I still saw dirt and scratches in the image, obviously from the original film media.
I would not buy into another of these events unless I was assured of the technical presentation quality, though it was fun to watch with appreciating peers.

, but the backup chronometer uses good 'ole mechanical wheels
. Or maybe it's the mechanical chronometer that would be impervious to chroniton radiation
...
.
. Plus, cell phones break when you drop them- I suspect a Mil_spec field rated communicator can take a LOT more abuse, which accounts for the size/packaging design. The real issue I have with the Pike communicator is not its size/functionality, but the decision to make it transparent, revealing the 60's era resistors, caps, etc, for no real reason. The TOS series communicator fixes this, and becomes smaller, and looks more like a MIL-Spec field device. If they'd simply made the Pike unit a solid color, there would be no real issue.
.
)
22 Stars said:
I think showing the Doomsday Machine would be fun, but they would have to couple it with another, perhaps The Ultimate Computer (when they finish with it) to make it a two hour event.
Still, I don't think it would be as well attended as this fist screening. And many people who went to this, wouldn't go again because of the poor presentation. If TPTB were really smart, they would show a few of these on CBS HD sometime as a special, far more people would actually see the improved effects and quality.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.