Wow, these are really really stupid...:Actually, Memory Alpha's guidelines are a bit vague when it comes to which background sources can be used as article names.
For those who enjoy reading Memory Alpha arguments, here are a few more:
Forum:Alternate reality official name
Forum:Is the AR info applicable to the PR
Talk:Earth-Kzin Wars
Talk:Kzinti
Talk:Rigellian
These are just funny. Reminds of the late 5Billion...
I actually read this one when it came out.
Anyways, thanks for some very entertaining hours of Trek nitpicking and rule bending.
Yeah, someone pointed at that the Kelvin timeline was called "an alterante reality" which made it quite clear that it was not a name...What I find bizarre about the Memory Alpha argument -- and I commented on this in one of the talk pages -- is that they're treating "alternate reality" as if it were an actual proper name for a specific individual timeline, rather than just a category identifier like "red giant star" or "dwarf galaxy." There have been other timelines in Trek that have been described in dialogue as alternate realities, so it's obviously meant as a generic label rather than a specific one. Nobody would argue that the article for Vulcan should be renamed "Desert planet" or that the article for Data should be renamed "Positronic android."
Last edited: