...if anti-matter is gravitationally repulsive to normal matter...
I never really studied warp engines mechanics, but I always got the impression that Dilithium somehow focused/amplified the power. If it was simply to soak up gamma rays and what not, the loss of the dilithium shouldn't have effected the actual usability of the warp core as it did many times on the show.
I never really studied warp engines mechanics,... <Snip>
True, it's probably not even offered at Oxford. But being a writer (albeit a mediocre one) I like to stick with whats established. The question about the anti matter was both from a trek stand point, and also a curiosity as to what current physics says about it. I might pose a similar question about it in the Sci&Tech forum to see what gets said there.I never really studied warp engines mechanics,... <Snip>
In all honesty, I doubt very many people really have!
So, really, whatever works for you... is all that matters.
Cheers,
-CM-
...if anti-matter is gravitationally repulsive to normal matter...
It's not.
I never really studied warp engines mechanics, but I always got the impression that Dilithium somehow focused/amplified the power. If it was simply to soak up gamma rays and what not, the loss of the dilithium shouldn't have effected the actual usability of the warp core as it did many times on the show.
I recall the old TNG tech Manual went with the idea that dilithium is used to regulate the reaction, since it's molecular structure allows you to run little streams of matter and antimatter particles through it without touching dilithium itself. Which is kind of a neat idea, since we really do use garden-variety lithium as a sort of subatomic filter in experiments.
...if anti-matter is gravitationally repulsive to normal matter...
It's not.
We don't know ANYTHING about antimatter's gravitational processes, hence the reason I said "if"
I know they use deuterium for the "matter" component, which is an isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron, but I don't think they have ever said what the composition of the anti-matter is...Sure it could, as long as it existed in an anti-galaxy physically isolated from normal matter. In fact, if anti-matter is gravitationally repulsive to normal matter, anti-galaxies could easily exist in vast numbers, drawing anti-matter to themselves while repelling normal matter, never ever colliding or even approaching normal-matter galaxies.
Side note: an anti-deuterium atom encountering an oxygen atom would 1) annihilate itself into gamma ray photons and other particles instantly and 2) at the same time, instantly transmute that oxygen into an atom of ionized and probably superheated nitrogen (having obliterated one proton and one neutron).
Of course, if you simply bombarded oxygen with positrons, you would turn all of its electrons into gamma ray photons and you'd end up with an extremely energetic, radioactive, positively-charged plasma. For a long time I always assumed this was how warp cores worked, since the positive charge would produce ALOT of electric potential, plus it would give you some kind of warp plasma to shoot through the nacelles (with dilithium there just to soak up all those gamma rays and turn them into, I don't know, microwaves or something a little more useful for power creation). But I digress...
I know they use deuterium for the "matter" component, which is an isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron, but I don't think they have ever said what the composition of the anti-matter is...
Interesting wiki regarding this debate.Fair enough, point taken and conceded.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.