My objections are for other reasons--the shameless cash grab, that Dr. Doom should be a recurring, major threat, and that he shouldn't look like Iron Man.
You juxtaposed my quotes as if to imply a contradiction, but of course general and specific argument are two different things, and every case is different. Bringing back proven, trusted directors to make an important, linchpin movie makes perfect sense, not as a superficial grab for audience attention but as a way of ensuring that your movie is made by people who've proven they can do the job reliably and well. It's especially important if you're under a time crunch, making a known commodity preferable to an unknown one. Bringing back your former star in a new role seems different, more arbitrary. It doesn't bear on whether the movie will be well-made and delivered on schedule, because the actors aren't remotely as important to that as the director(s), and good directors could find any number of capable actors and cultivate their best performances. If anything, it seems like a bad idea because it's just going to overshadow the character himself.Why aren't they making creative choices like making Galactus a cloud?
As I said, it might work if Doom never reveals his face, if it's a physical and vocal performance where Downey buries himself in the role. If they hired him because he's a great actor who can transform himself, great. It's no different from, say, Universal Monsters bringing back Bela Lugosi as Ygor and Boris Karloff as a mad scientist in later movies. But if they hired him because he was Tony Stark and they want him to be a version of Tony Stark again, that's what seems desperate and unimaginative, and a bizarre way to approach Doom.I have no doubt that he will be great in the role. My objections are for other reasons--the shameless cash grab, that Dr. Doom should be a recurring, major threat, and that he shouldn't look like Iron Man. Now, if he is indeed a variant, and there is another unannounced actor who will be the actual Von Doom going forward from these next movies, then I might be willing to ignore the shameless cash grab.
Although from photos showing the four of them in spacesuits and Ben not yet the Thing would seem to indicate their 'origin' is going to be shown at some point in the movie. Maybe it's some kind of museum on the first floor for tourists and that's a video playing, a flashback later in the movie, or possibly just a quick intro during the credits.FF is not an origin story (apologies if we already knew this) https://ew.com/fantastic-four-first-steps-not-an-origin-story-marvel-8684886?utm_campaign=entertainmentweekly_entertainmentweekly&utm_content=photo&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_term={{.ShareRef}}&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1DNXBKPrYy-UZPhdwIiXnRLy-KR0ATjVWffiz-SS_lgD1ftJUrN7UgGd0_aem_BxuSxyOHMABN5bWpi6lF_w
Lou Ferrigno.Norton or Bana as Maestro would be my dream.
Lou Ferrigno.
I've never been a math whiz but I seem to recall some rule about the sum total of two wrongs and what it does and doesn't equal.Why aren't they making creative choices like making Galactus a cloud?
I like it.IIRC, (and I may not) in the comics there was a recent revelation that Tony was not Howard's biological son and was adopted. If they go that route in the MCU, Doom could be a "Tony Stark" that was never adopted by the Starks.
I had learned about RDJ's return to the MCU on The Mary Sue Blog. Needless to say, the responses to the news and the article struck me as surprisingly negative.
I think you mean freight trains.So the only question is how big are the trucks of money been driven to Chris Evans and Scarlett Johansson's homes to get them to sign for Secret Wars?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.