I don't agree. If most was seen as a disappointment, why did they put Snyder in charge of the whole universe?
Here's my recolllection of things.... when they first announced the DCFU, i thought they said that it was supposed to be
director led, in that the director of each movie would have a greater say in how their film developed (as opposed to Kevin Feige overseeing and connecting their films) .
But it seems like as soon as they were making Man of Steel, they immediately had plans for sequels , starting with B v S, with JUstice League seemingly as part of the plan .
And unlike what
@TREK_GOD_1 portrays in his messages, not
every critic of the DCFU, and especially Zack Snyder, hates
everything about his movies. I think many of us 1) actually like DC properties and
want them to succeed and 2) saw a lot of good things within Snyder's films but 3) those things were sabotaged by the "mistakes" in them.
I think Zack Snyder
really could have benefitted from a partner , especially one who knew and appreciated the source material, who could have balanced things out or said "this part isn't right." I mean, things like SUperman basically being super-important by having all of Kryptonian's DNA in him was not needed, not his "sacrifice" at the end of B v S (becuase we
all knew he would come back easily)
It overshadowed all the great things about the films, such as Lois Lane, the next generation of WOnder WOman (with amazing theme), an Aquaman who was
cool and
not a joke...
OK, so far so good...
The second paragraph swerves away completely from the point of view of the first. Whatever happened to the studio having unrealistic expectations? "BvS should have made TWO BILLION DOLLARSaaaarrrggh!!!"
Says who? In any prior decade, who would have bought the premise that 874 million constitutes a flop?
I totally understand where you are coming from, but also, i think it's not unreasonable to expect movies with Superman and Batman to be
more popular from the get-go than Marvel.... I truly believe those who were
much more in the public's conscienceness than Marvels.
This might be in the DC thread...but someone had an analysis of the money situation, and how it panned out. Certainly if WW was the best DC FIlm in the US and Aquaman worldwide, how did SUperman
not reach those levels...i mean he should have been able to leap tall goals in a single bound!
But unlike Marvel, WB panicked and didn't have bible who could right things in a reasonable way.
The switch to Joss Whedon made sense financially -- he had legitimately proven he can do a billion dollar SUperhero movie. The problem was he was brought in at the tail end rather than the beginning, and we all know it showed.