So? One example is not all examples. There are many ways to make villains interesting. GOTG used none of them on Ronan.
His strength and the role he played in setting up the plot were enough.
But she's the secondary villain.
She's still there.
So? One example is not all examples. There are many ways to make villains interesting. GOTG used none of them on Ronan.
But she's the secondary villain.
His strength and the role he played in setting up the plot were enough.
I think the fact that he spoke entirely in a madeup language didn't help his performance.
Sure, but it's still easier for an actor to emote in their own language.That depends -- does he have Shakespearean training? That's great for figuring out how to convey ideas and emotions even when your audience doesn't necessarily understand the words you're using. That's why Star Trek used so many Shakespearean actors -- it's great training for SF or fantasy.
Sure, but it's still easier for an actor to emote in their own language.
The new series will premiere in IMAX commercial theaters, marking the first time a live-action TV series has debuted in such a format. The first two episodes of the ABC series, which is set to arrive in fall of 2017 under the title Marvel's The Inhumans, will run worldwide exclusively in IMAX for two weeks for the beginning of September 2017. ABC will the premiere the series in a weekly format.
An Inhumans movie was originally slated for November of 2018 but has been the topic of discussion since being pushed back, then off of Marvel's release schedule. The characters, however, have been introduced throughout Marvel's Agents of SHIELD.
ABC, IMAX, and Marvel Television will work together to create a joint marketing and promotion plan for the series -- making it the closest thing to an Inhumans movie, considering the IMAX release format, we will see.
“This unprecedented alliance represents a bold, innovative approach to launching great TV content for a worldwide audience,” said Ben Sherwood, co-chairman, Disney Media Networks and president, Disney|ABC Television Group. “It highlights Disney|ABC’s unrelenting commitment to finding new and creative ways to showcasing our very best programming and increasing global engagement and reach.”
Lockjaw would be CGI. Gorgon, CGI when we see his legs. Triton, costume and appliances.I really gotta wonder they could do the Royal Family on a tv budget. Obviously Medusa's chair isn't going to be constant CGI movement. What about um the big guy with backwards goat's legs? What about Lockjaw? What about Triton?
I really gotta wonder they could do the Royal Family on a tv budget. Obviously Medusa's chair isn't going to be constant CGI movement.
What about um the big guy with backwards goat's legs?
What about Lockjaw?
I wonder if we'll get any kind of set up or crossovers with AOS? With Inhumans being such being such a big part of the show, I'd assume we will.
As for the debate about the villains in the movies, it is disappointing that they're wasting great actors, but I'm not that bothered by the characters themselves. They're just there to give the heroes a conflict and something to punch, and since the movies are about the heroes and not them, I'm fine with that. I can see where it would be annoying if you are looking forward to a character appearing onscreen and ended up being disappointing, but I think there are more than enough good points to make up for that.
It's just that well-drawn and complex villains are such a major part of what Marvel is known for in the comics, so it's surprising that they can't bring that to their movies as well, except in occasional cases like Loki.
Most of their best villains got sold to Fox, like Magneto and Dr Doom.
And Fox has done a far worse job with Dr. Doom than Marvel has done with its own villains, which is just sad.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.