Most dedications aren't at the beginning anyway. They're usually at the end. Sometimes they're even integrated inconspicuously in the middle of the credits somewhere. Besides, certainly on TV at least, they have dedications for crew members the general public never heard of all the time. More people will have heard of Randy Pausch and Majel Barrett than when they insert a dedication to one of the cast or crew's recently deceased parents, as is sometimes the case.There will be no on screen dedication to herat the beginning.
For 99% of the audience of this film - her name means nothing.
Is it right? No - but that's what will happen. We might see something at the end.
There will be no on screen dedication to herat the beginning.
For 99% of the audience of this film - her name means nothing.
Is it right? No - but that's what will happen. We might see something at the end.
I've never heard of it being an issue. IMDB lists the dedication thusly:There will be no on screen dedication to herat the beginning.
For 99% of the audience of this film - her name means nothing.
Is it right? No - but that's what will happen. We might see something at the end.
On the other hand, I want to ask, was Heath Ledger honored at the beginning or end of The Dark Knight? He was an A-Lister by that point, so fame shouldn't be an issue with placement.
[URL="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468569/crazycredits" said:IMDB[/URL]]The closing credits have the line "In memory of our friends Heath Ledger & Conway Wickliffe."
Merging this with the other thread.
Most dedications aren't at the beginning anyway. They're usually at the end. Sometimes they're even integrated inconspicuously in the middle of the credits somewhere. Besides, certainly on TV at least, they have dedications for crew members the general public never heard of all the time. More people will have heard of Randy Pausch and Majel Barrett than when they insert a dedication to one of the cast or crew's recently deceased parents, as is sometimes the case.There will be no on screen dedication to herat the beginning.
For 99% of the audience of this film - her name means nothing.
Is it right? No - but that's what will happen. We might see something at the end.
If Star Trek would of continued where it was before Abrams' Trek, I'm sure they would of included something.
There will be no on screen dedication to herat the beginning.
For 99% of the audience of this film - her name means nothing.
Is it right? No - but that's what will happen. We might see something at the end.
It doesn't really matter at all how famous she was. Besides, she shares a name with another somewhat important Trek figure - GR - who will be getting the creator credit in the same movie.
If Star Trek would of continued where it was before Abrams' Trek, I'm sure they would of included something.
Why would the setting of the movie have had much of a contributing factor if there is a dedication or not?
Except that isn't what he said. Neither of the people quoted in your post mentioned J.J. Abrams at all, and the person you quoted directly said that the fact that most of the intended audience probably wouldn't know who she was had little or no bearing on whether a dedication would be included, and seemed inclined to think there would be one.Why would the setting of the movie have had much of a contributing factor if there is a dedication or not?If Star Trek would of continued where it was before Abrams' Trek, I'm sure they would of included something.
Because the person I was replying to said because since J.J. took over, he probably could care less if a contribution was made to Majel Barrett. If Trek was continuing on from where I think it should be, from Roddenberry's vision, is why I stated what I stated.
The ending credits is where memorials are usually put, and Majel will most certainly get one. As to 99% of the audience not knowing who she is, I say bullshit. If she was so obscure, her passing would not have been listed as a "top story" on Yahoo, IMDB, Variety, etc. Virtually every entertainment sites placed the story prominently, and not just those that cater to the genre market. We're talking mainstream media sites, and mainstream news networks, on what was most certainly not a slow news day.There will be no on screen dedication to herat the beginning.
For 99% of the audience of this film - her name means nothing.
Is it right? No - but that's what will happen. We might see something at the end.
Because the person I was replying to said because since J.J. took over, he probably could care less if a contribution was made to Majel Barrett. If Trek was continuing on from where I think it should be, from Roddenberry's vision, is why I stated what I stated.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.