(Why is it, by the way, that no one said a thing in MONTHS to me about the Jaynz material.. not a word.. not a peep... then I get hundres of people pissed at me suddenly for retiring it?!)
(Why is it, by the way, that no one said a thing in MONTHS to me about the Jaynz material.. not a word.. not a peep... then I get hundres of people pissed at me suddenly for retiring it?!)
NBC had that same problem in the late 60s when they tried to cancel a certain show...the name escapes me.
NBC had that same problem in the late 60s when they tried to cancel a certain show...the name escapes me.
NBC had that same problem in the late 60s when they tried to cancel a certain show...the name escapes me.
It starred William Shatner.. I think it was "Barbary Coast"! ...![]()
I thought it was T.J. Hooker (or was that the '70s?)
I thought it was T.J. Hooker (or was that the '70s?)
That was early 80's, baby.. complete with big hair.
Thanks.Okay, now you're getting it.
Yes, the lens flares on the Kingon engines are too much, and too synthetic looking, and the flare from the sun is probably too bright (or at least, not quite right; look here for how a sun flare looks from orbit). But your lighting has has come a long way, and your shading on the planet is really good. I like it. Aside from that, the only thing that jumps out at me is that the atmospheric gradient is too large and looks too much a like a glow; again, see the NASA photo. I might also suggest having your clouds on a separate, slightly larger sphere with a transparency map so they throw shadows onto the planet below.
Thanks.That is Awesome! Is that a cut out in the Klingon warp nacelle or does the part there just happen to match the color of the ocean behind it?
The planet really looks nice to me. In fact, the whole image reminds me of the box cover from the old Star Fleet Battles game.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.