RobertScorpio
Pariah
I thought you had an embargo on posting threads?
actually I do...but had to finish the lost vs trek battles....so consider this one dedicated to you sidious6184161055
Rob
I thought you had an embargo on posting threads?
I assume you meant "antagonists". I don't agree, not when it comes to DS9. The recurring cast (Dukat, Garak, Damar, Winn...) were just as compelling as the main cast (Kira, Odo, Sisko, Quark...). There was barely any weak link in the cast.Both shows ironically ended up with more interesting characters that weren't a part of the original cast and with the protagonists being more compelling than the good guys. DS9 had Dukat, Damar, the Founder, Kai Winn, Garak, Martok for instance and LOST had Ben, Widmore, Eloise, Daniel Faraday etc.
We'll have to disagree then. I didn't find the main cast all that compelling. You could definitely see the writers felt that way as well given how in the later years O'Brien, Bashir, Jadzia, Ezri, Jake, Quark were pretty much sidelined in favor of the recurring cast.IThe recurring cast (Dukat, Garak, Damar, Winn...) were just as compelling as the main cast (Kira, Odo, Sisko, Quark...). There was barely any weak link in the cast.
We'll have to disagree then. I didn't find the main cast all that compelling. You could definitely see the writers felt that way as well given how in the later years O'Brien, Bashir, Jadzia, Ezri, Jake, Quark were pretty much sidelined in favor of the recurring cast.
Look at the Final Chapter for instance--Ezri and Bashir's stories centered around their love interest, O'Brien was the techno guy and Bashir's bud, Quark was comic relief, Jake was nowhere, Worf was pretty much played out. The fun stuff was with the Founder, Weyoun, Damar, Dukat, Winn, Martok, Garak etc. Kira and Odo were probably the strongest of the main regulars but the rest I was "meh" on.
I really liked Sisko in the pilot. I found him very compelling, much more so than any of the other character. Then, after the pilot, Sisko got virtually no treatment for the rest of the season. Pity.
Sisko was sort of a retry of Captain Pike. Pike was the captain who didn't want to be captain because of inner turmoil. It didn't work in the 60s. It did work in the 90s.
Yeah, can you imagine Captain Kirk wanting to leave Starfleet on TOS? It would have been out of character, and it wouldn't have fit with the swashbuckling hero image the network -- and, no doubt, the 60s audience -- wanted. Pike was a swashbuckling hero who didn't want to be a swashbuckling hero. I don't think the audience was ready for that kind of anti-hero.huh..i had never thought of it that way...
Rob
I voted DS9 only because its reach didn't exceed its grasp. It delivered what it promised to (mostly). Lost had the potential to be way better, but then we got season six and a non-sequitur finale. Lost started way better than DS9 though.
Good thing the Dominion didn't attack while they were playing baseball in the holosuites or hanging out at Vic's.
I think my favorite take on this is when O'Brien and Bashir are playing with their Alamo model and Quark comes over and harrasses them for it asking if they should be doing something more productive. They reply by saying that they had both been working all day long for a double shift.
The point is that even during war, people still need to find time to relax and enjoy entertainment. And the particular situation on DS9 is that it wasn't really the front line of the war. So what exactly should they do?
Didn't they ask for the life of his son in "The Reckoning"? Plus Kira and DS9?The way the Prophets saved Sisko's ass in Sacrifice of Angels and then never really asked for anything much in return.
He was always loyal to the Federation, and Admiral Ross did question his affinity for Bajor. It was mentioned several times how uneasy it made the Federation that Sisko had such a role, but they also didn't want to mess around with it and upset the Bajorans.The way Starfleet didn't seem to care that Sisko's loyalties had shifted to a bunch of wormhole aliens who as far as anyone knew, were in cahoots with the Dominion.
It was also pretty obvious the prophets weren't in league with the Dominion since they got rid of thousands of their ships.
I didn't find it too strained. Yes, the odds were against them, but just like in real war, sometimes one man or a small group of people can have a great effect on the outcome.And of course, the strained logic of how Starfleet actually won the war.
All of these things were effectively explained, and several orders of magnitude away from the ridiculousness of some of Lost's magical plot contrivances in the later seasons.
Nowadays I don't even consider it serialized.
There's some serialized material, but mostly DS9's approach is more of a "landscape" storytelling style, a bit like Marvel comics has used in recent years. The background and setting evolve over time, with occasional momentous events. Some of the stories then contribute to the ongoing plot, but others just take advantage of the new "landscape" without really altering it.
That's a very good way of putting it.
I noticed that in non-Sisko-centric episodes he had absolutely no personality whatsoever, then suddenly becomes multi-faceted and charming again in his centric episodes.
We never did see the "other shift" for the station - was there another Sisko, Kira, etc?
Sisko being loyal to the Feds wasn't proof he wasn't being duped. The Prophets could have made the Dom fleet disappear as a ruse to lull the Feds into complacency.
The Prophets did ask for Jake's life, sure - but Jake didn't die, so that didn't count. Jake really did need to die, or the whole thing's a big cop-out.
I'm pretty sure that there's just one commander and one XO of the station, so no. Just like I'm sure that there wasn't another captain of the Enterprise sharing duty with Picard.We never did see the "other shift" for the station - was there another Sisko, Kira, etc?
.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.