• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Lorca is a coward and murderer, how come he's a Starfleet Captain still??

There's no way Starfleet wouldn't know what happened to the Buran. We just don't have enough info to go on at this point so we don't know how it went down so I wouldn't call Lorca a coward just yet.
 
Yeah, I thought the same thing. His justification is utterly absurd, he himself escapes Klingon captivity in the same episode in which he talks about this massacre. And it is completely surreal he would be allowed to be a captain after that, and I really don't want to watch Star Trek where the Federation allows that.

You should stop then. It will make you feel better.
 
He prevented his crew from being tortured, raped and eaten while killing many of the enemy.
He used every method at his disposal to get get a technological science and tactical leap operational.
He scored many important victories over the enemy.

I am not seeing much of a problem here.
 
You should stop then. It will make you feel better.
I'll give it couple of episodes more. But yeah, I'm pretty fed up with the grimdark Trek. The producers said that it would get less grim in the future, but I'm not sure I trust them any more.
 
I'll give it couple of episodes more. But yeah, I'm pretty fed up with the grimdark Trek. The producers said that it would get less grim in the future, but I'm not sure I trust them any more.

I think you're just punishing yourself if you think it's going to change. It's not likely to. If you don't like it thus far, it's probably just not your thing. You may want to stop while you're ahead.

;)
 
I never really had the benefit of watching Enterprise which is pre-Discovery. So is one to believe that Discovery, set ten years before Kirk etc. represents a time in Federation history where you can kill your whole crew and you get another shipload of suckers to fly around with? Where you can be charged for mutiny and end up back in uniform essentially making deal breaking decisions concerning secret technology?

These are not small incidents, with questionable sacrfice being made. A whole crew. A whole.. war. That's big time.
Because Starfleet always likes to give new ships to screwups. I mean look at Picard:

Go rewatch TNG's - "The Battle" and realize:

- Picard LOST his ship (and probably suffered many crew deaths) because even after his ship was nearly destroyed, he was STILL on the Comms begging tghem not to fire again.

- The 'Picard maneuver' wasn't a display of 'tactical brilliance' it was a: "What the hell; the ship's about to blow anyway - so either we survives or he goes BOOM with me!" pure desperation maneuver - that were Picard competent, should never have been tried (because he would not be in a situation where his ship is blowing up.)

- Picard must be terrible at damage evaluation because not only did the Hull survive; there was enough of the ship systems left that Bokk could fully repair the ship back to Starfleet standards - and get full access to it's databanks.
^^^
So, what did Picard get after that debacle? Full Command of the newest ship (at that time) in the Fleet (and in the 24th Century the Federation Flagship) - the 1701-D.:rommie:
 
We only think the Enterprise-D was the "Federation flagship" because Starfleet allowed Picard and his deluded crew to think that was actually a thing. No one wanted to break Picard's heart by having him look up the actual definition of 'flagship'.
 
We only think the Enterprise-D was the "Federation flagship" because Starfleet allowed Picard and his deluded crew to think that was actually a thing. No one wanted to break Picard's heart by having him look up the actual definition of 'flagship'.
Enterprise-D was assigned with transporting freshly replicated flags to the fleet admiral.
 
Because Starfleet always likes to give new ships to screwups. I mean look at Picard:

Go rewatch TNG's - "The Battle" and realize:

- Picard LOST his ship (and probably suffered many crew deaths) because even after his ship was nearly destroyed, he was STILL on the Comms begging tghem not to fire again.

- The 'Picard maneuver' wasn't a display of 'tactical brilliance' it was a: "What the hell; the ship's about to blow anyway - so either we survives or he goes BOOM with me!" pure desperation maneuver - that were Picard competent, should never have been tried (because he would not be in a situation where his ship is blowing up.)

- Picard must be terrible at damage evaluation because not only did the Hull survive; there was enough of the ship systems left that Bokk could fully repair the ship back to Starfleet standards - and get full access to it's databanks.
^^^
So, what did Picard get after that debacle? Full Command of the newest ship (at that time) in the Fleet (and in the 24th Century the Federation Flagship) - the 1701-D.:rommie:

Not to mention, Picard surrenders the Enterprise 20 minutes into the pilot episode. Great intro to our new hero.

I find it amusing how people talk about the "unlikability" of characters like Lorca and Burnham. The TNG crew took about 2 full seasons of 20+ episodes each before anyone became even remotely likable.

Picard was an uptight, stern, unlikable, preachy, self righteous horses ass for the better part of 2 years.
 
I think a few references were made about the on-going war, and those might be some of the reasons. This reveals the writing problem for this series, i.e., they are cramming too much content and are unable to develop most of them.
 
I think a few references were made about the on-going war, and those might be some of the reasons. This reveals the writing problem for this series, i.e., they are cramming too much content and are unable to develop most of them.
It's been five episodes. :shrug:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top