Annnnnd there are people complaining that Faye's costume is not slutty as her anime counterpart. Because, you know, in real life going around dressed like this is certainly very practical and functional.![]()
I'm worried that this is too close to the animation style. It comes off as more cosplayish or something like the 'Street Fighter' 1994 movie. I understand staying close to the material but I might have preferred something a bit more reinvented for live action.
Just saw this thread. I am... concerned. I LOVE the series and the movie. But the horror that was the US live action Ghost in the Shell has made me rather gunshy. At least I might get new Yoko Kanno music out of it.
No one who wants this costume in real life has ever been to a convention. It was not meant for actual human bodies.
This is decent cosplay that gives an idea of what a costume faithful to the original might look like in real life.No one who wants this costume in real life has ever been to a convention. It was not meant for actual human bodies.
Humans dress basically for two reasons:I know the shorts are a non starter, though some women do Want to dress like that, and honestly the movement to de sexualize women is going to the Burka not showing anything side. Let women dress as they want to dress, get the imput of the actress and see what there comfortable with with no pushing.
But anyways, the shorts as seen are a no go, but the top, and especially the red light jacket would work. What my mind first thought was, she isn't wearing her jacket right.
Maybe atleast keep the yellow color of the shorts in whatever they ended up with would have been nice.
Humans dress basically for two reasons:
1) Protect their body from the external environment
2) Respect local customs on what is suitable to wear on certain occasions.
Powdered wigs and stiletto heels might want to have a word. (no history lessons if wigs have some purpose, you get my point) Much money could be saved if that was the only reasons people dressed.
Well you have to consider this: Ed appeared only from the 9th episode and the Netflix show is composed by 10 episodes. It makes sens that he/she/they would debut in a hypothetical secondo season.So they're really leaving Ed out then? Not too surprising I suppose since I can't imagine it would be easy to cast the role with an actual child.
Well you have to consider this: Ed appeared only from the 9th episode and the Netflix show is composed by 10 episodes. It makes sens that he/she/they would debut in a hypothetical secondo season.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.