They don't? The one thing I definitely liked was the Mad Men-esque fun of seeing people behave in ways they couldn't get away with now. Life on Mars made me want to see a historical cop show, but without any sci fi angle, and if the 70s are too modern, how about the 20s or 30s? That could be a lot of fun.A gritty 70s cop show really wouldn't do what Mad Men does, because many modern cop shows don't show anything different.
Which would miss the point of this story completely. It's about Sam Tyler trying to figure out if he's "mad, in a coma, or back in time", and having to deal with the almost alien world around him at the same time (hence the metaphor in the title).If they wanted to do a gritty 70s cop drama, do a gritty 70s cop drama.
Seriously, if you're interested, watch the original. It gets the point across much better, and doesn't assume the audience is as thick as pigshit like both versions of the US pilot do.
On topic, watched this last night. It's shit. Has none of the subtly or depth of the original, and even Harvey Keitel manages to be a rubbish Gene Hunt. Maybe I'm just spoiled by Glenister, but ours is definitive. I just can't accept anyone else in the role, especially not when their lines aren't anywhere near as witty. Talking about Keitel, has he had a stroke or something? My ears are no strangers to American accents, least of all his, but half the time I could barely figure out what he was saying.
Points for their use of the twin towers, that had a lot of impact and to my surprise, the sight of them made me start to well up for a nanosecond. Weird. I don't think the shot at the end of the episode was needed though.
the Mad Men-esque fun of seeing people behave in ways they couldn't get away with now.
Actually, the creators came up with the show because the networks were looking for police shows, and the only why they thought they could bare writing one was if it was set in the 70s, so that's what they did.the Mad Men-esque fun of seeing people behave in ways they couldn't get away with now.
Looking over the thread, it seems the US viewers see this as the appeal of the US version? And some at least of the UK viewers explicitly claim more to the show?
Well here's something for y'all to gnaw on, three versions of the same scene for Life on Mars. Scene one: ABC. Scene two: BBC. Scene three: Original ABC pilot.
i sorta thought that sam was thinking i must have hit my head really hard during the early stuff like seeing the car and especially the wtc.
that he was seeing something that he didnt believe was really there.
the police station bought things into stark reality that something very wrong and personal was going on.
I watched the "three versions of the same scene" and what I found most interesting was how thick Meaney's accent still was. I think his accent is so thick and non-American that his lines become poorly delivered as an American Gene.
I watched the "three versions of the same scene" and what I found most interesting was how thick Meaney's accent still was. I think his accent is so thick and non-American that his lines become poorly delivered as an American Gene.
How different does he sound than when he's Miles O'Brien?
the US version is best seen without seeing the British version first.
He sounds like O'Brien only wooden and boring.I watched the "three versions of the same scene" and what I found most interesting was how thick Meaney's accent still was. I think his accent is so thick and non-American that his lines become poorly delivered as an American Gene.
How different does he sound than when he's Miles O'Brien?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.