Drunk driving isn't the best idea in the world, so better to avoid it altogether. Just a couple of drinks can make a big difference. My uncle was killed by a drunk driver.
I just don't see driving as something that is (or should be) a Constitutional right. If one can't obey various state laws then they should give up their cars and find another way to get around.
Americans are crazy.
I just don't see driving as something that is (or should be) a Constitutional right. If one can't obey various state laws then they should give up their cars and find another way to get around.
Driving is a constitutional right, but being free from illegal searches and seizures is.
That being said, there often isn't another way to get around. Cars are necessities in the vast majority of the United States.
I'm sorry, I missed a not there. Driving is not a constitutional right.
Sorry, I realize that kinda changes the meaning![]()
That being said, there often isn't another way to get around. Cars are necessities in the vast majority of the United States.
That being said, there often isn't another way to get around. Cars are necessities in the vast majority of the United States.
This has always been something that interested me actually. We do the same thing here, "driving is a privilege not a right", "you chose to get behind the wheel so you signed up to this", etc. Perhaps true in 1945. But in 2015 in the US or the UK or in most places for that matter, is driving still a luxury you can just choose not to do? If you live outside a major conurbation with efficient public transport, then certainly not without greatly affecting your life. The legal fiction that you are engaging in a luxury or a privilege when you get in a car is an old one but doesn't make much sense today if you think about it too hard. You could equally say using the same logic you have 'chosen' to walk the streets and therefore have 'signed up' to being stopped and having your ID checked, but we don't say that - we attach a privacy and a right to walking on public roads, but not to driving on them. Possibly it's the only way to keep people safe, so it's a necessity, but I don't think we can pretend its a logical distinction anymore.
There is guidance in the Highway Code, but remember that unless you see the words 'MUST' or 'MUST NOT' it isn't enforceable law. The only one of those that is a law is the last.
In related news, I have found a legal way of selling flamethrowers to families of DUI victims.
In related news, I have found a legal way of selling flamethrowers to families of DUI victims.
If only life were that easy.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.