The beauty of this is that my idea still doesn't preclude yours - yours might just be one of them.That would be way more interesting than my idea of an old lost technology Enterprise, so I'm all for it.

The beauty of this is that my idea still doesn't preclude yours - yours might just be one of them.That would be way more interesting than my idea of an old lost technology Enterprise, so I'm all for it.
But what's left of Starfleet would be under no obligation to use Fed built ships. Retrofitting 1000 yo designs is crazy when there are people out there building ship like Bookersthe season will ultimately explain (or not) but one reason I was thinking for those old ships, is possible that prior to the burn the federation simply wasn't using ships all that much anymore.
if peace had been achieved, the era of gunboat diplomacy was mostly over, and exploration had slowed to a crawl because everything in the galaxy had been explored, that kind of puts a bottle cap on starfleet. Added to the idea (one that is 100% Gene's Vision © , is that eventually people would be transporting everywhere, anyway). Long distance transporters, hubs and routers, plus replicators on site for whatever you need, would have cut ship traffic to minuscule).
So maybe the post-burn starfleet ships are whatever was left in places like Surplus Depot Z-15. Whatever few ships were still in service by the time of the burn were lost. Without much fuel, trained officers, and most importantly, working ship yards, what was left of starfleet would have been reduced to upgrading and maintaining whatever hulls they could find. Depressing but realistic.
What remains to be rationalized in models like that is the blatant: why are all the ships seen crashing there from the mid-23rd century?
What remains to be rationalized in models like that is the blatant: why are all the ships seen crashing there from the mid-23rd century?
I mean, we can spread the Hoovers and Hiawathas across as many decades as we wish. But between them and the Burn, there are the Excelsiors and the Ambassadors and the Galaxies and the Inquiries at least. Why is this particular piece of sky raining 2250s starships specifically?
Timo Saloniemi
The NATO phonetic alphabet (if that’s what Starfleet is using for the Enterprise’s lettering system) would actually have ‘Alfa’ as ‘A,’ not ‘Alpha.’ B would be ‘Bravo,’ etc. I don’t think they’re using the Greek alphabet because there wouldn’t be enough letters (e.g. there’s no Greek letter for ‘C.’)
I'll assume you know using that phonetic alphabet is how you call out individual letters over audio in the real world, to prevent confusion, especially if there is poor signal quality. So, they were just saying "1701-A" in a manner that's more realistic than in most of Trek. Certain things are far more consistent with their real-world counterparts in the post-TMP Original Series movies.I mean that they could start using Greek letters.
I am aware having had to communicate with the FBI relatively frequently in a previous job. I guess I was imagining not as phoenetic but the actual Greek letters: Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Epsilon, etc, but on the hull would be their Greek equivalent, not written out as such.I'll assume you know using that phonetic alphabet is how you call out individual letters over audio in the real world, to prevent confusion, especially if there is poor signal quality. So, they were just saying "1701-A" in a manner that's more realistic than in most of Trek. Certain things are far more consistent with their real-world counterparts in the post-TMP Original Series movies.
We probably also have to take into account real-life issues. Having to do all of the special effects from home may have forced the effects artists to use older digital models instead of creating new more time period accurate ones. We may just have to pretend that these are newer designs. Perhaps why they chose first season ships that were pretty much in the background (like the Hoover class) and could potentially be reused as a more contemporary ship type.What remains to be rationalized in models like that is the blatant: why are all the ships seen crashing there from the mid-23rd century?
And yet despite it's bad luck i'd argue that the Enterprise-C is the most important enterprise of all.I feel really bad for Charlie. 1701 Charlie, that is. Had the worst luck out of all of them.
Actually the ships in the trailer look like they might have been around for a long time. Maybe the Discovery crew and their allies find them somewhere and refit them to build a new fleet. And then some of them get damaged or destroyed during a big event![]()
And that's in the very category of explanations that requires the additional rationalization I was calling for. If the heroes find "old ships", why are those from the 2250s and not additionally from the 2320s and 2490s and 2580s?
Pretending that, say, the Hoover is actually modern doesn't help all that much. How modern is modern? Is the Hoover the token ship we're missing from the 27th century, or the 29th? We need a range of designs capable of covering almost a thousand years of starship operations; are the DSC 2250s ships really up to that job?
Having it be a dream would be fine. Having it be a very specific cache of ship would be fine, too, but would require rather clever writing. Say, if the heroes need spares for the Discovery, they wouldn't scavenge a Galaxy or an Inquiry - and if the act of scavenging sent the ships crashing, perhaps it wouldn't crash the Nebulas or the Excelsiors.
Timo Saloniemi
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.