It's not written to explore and illuminate an era of history, it's just a crap detective script the writer couldn't sell to anyone else.
It's a monster story, but the monster doesn't have an alien origin.Black Orchid is a pure historical, so I'm not sure why it wouldn't count?
I'm not a fan of most of the ones I saw. The Aztecs being the exception.
"I didn't get you where you wanted to go, but always got you where you needed to go."Even if that's so, "Black Orchid" is the only Doctor Who story since "The Gunfighters" to have no science fiction or fantasy elements other than the main cast and the TARDIS, so it counts as a historical, at least technically.
I'd actually be happy if they'd do the occasional straight historical story again from time to time. I get tired of the contrivance of the Doctor's every visit to Earth history involving an alien invasion or time traveler or supernatural force or whatever.
I watched The Myth Makers recon years ago. I don't remember much about it. I haven't tried to tackle The Massacre, The Smugglers, or The Highlanders. I have tried to tackle Marco Polo and quickly quit.Of that list, I just have to "watch" The Myth Makers, The Massacre, and The Smugglers. I'll probably go with the audio plus linking narration versions of those stories. I can generally tolerate recons, especially when they're in an only partially missing story, but for these historicals the recons just feel worse to me (which is why I switched from recon to audio after the first episode of The Highlanders).
Reverse the polarity of the neutron flow!I do love Pertwee's Science Doctor. He's the most sciencey Doctor.
It's not written to explore and illuminate an era of history, it's just a crap detective script the writer couldn't sell to anyone else.
It's not written to explore and illuminate an era of history, it's just a crap detective script the writer couldn't sell to anyone else.
"Black Orchid" got the 2-part slot, which is unfortunate. There are seeds of a great story in this, let down by generic direction and the underlying story lacks the pull to get beyond that "just point a camera at the stage and let the actors act", having to rush through episodes with no effective atmosphere, countered by overly long spectacle with the cricket match, emphasis on a book that isn't even real, and slang for which most of it isn't quite topping - or believable since all the "1920s slang" websites don't seem to have those words.
The show was also missing a proper script editor, since Bidmead had left and Saward had only just been hired and likely hadn't the time to tweak it. JNT himself was contemplating directing it, but due to time constraints had to hire stalwart Ron Jones to do it. Considering how JNT had directed (uncredited), among other scenes, the fantastic "Cyber massacre" scene from "The Five Doctors", he would have made a fantastic director as well.
Quick side note: While JNT was great at direction and brought in lots of new directors to add new style to the show, which was costly, he would turn to Ron and other directors who were more cost-effective to compensate, especially if there was a time crunch.
JNT had been working on Who since… I think The War Games? Didn’t he start as an assistant, and then floor manager?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.