Yeah, I've not seen The Two Doctors for a while either, but it can't be all that bad, given its Bob Holmes and all.
I listened to Omega years ago but I don't remember much about it, so perhaps I wasn't all that enthused by it. Although, out of the villain trilogy, I only enjoyed Master, but even with that one I had some issues with its revelations.
Either way, that shows I never really had much use for Omega...
I agree it utilizes multiple Doctors better than The Five Doctors (despite the Hartnell handicap) but I think The Two Doctors utilized the two pretty well, too, but it's been years since I've watched it.
Yeah, I've not seen The Two Doctors for a while either, but it can't be all that bad, given its Bob Holmes and all.
It's a bit awkward trying to cram in a new Two/Jamie story when they're decades older, and its conceit that they dropped off Victoria temporarily doesn't fit the Doctor's inability to steer the TARDIS in that era -- which is the main thing that led to the creation of the "Series 6B" theory that the Time Lords sent the Doctor on secret missions between "The War Games" and "Spearhead from Space," though that's still not a very good patch for it.
Otherwise, I found it mostly entertaining and I enjoyed the interplay between the Doctors, but I was uncomfortable with the Doctor's attitude toward the Androgums as an intrinsically inferior and savage race. It's one thing for the Doctor to have that kind of attitude toward Daleks or Cybermen, who have mighty, destructive empires, but the Androgums are a servant population, so the Doctor's contempt for them as a race feels like punching down, which is out of character.
Yeah, I've not seen The Two Doctors for a while either, but it can't be all that bad, given its Bob Holmes and all.
It's a bit awkward trying to cram in a new Two/Jamie story when they're decades older,
When I first saw the story as a kid, I went "That's cool." But I knew nothing of the junkings, much less where the companions did end up at. Later rewatches do reveal some discontinuities, partly due to Holmes' health, last minute location change because funding collapsed (supposedly the American distributor cofinanced what would have been a trip to New Orleans), as well as mixing up how Doctors 2 and 3 acted as 2 acts so much more like 3 in this one. And yet, Troughton still keeps Troughtonisms in it, and Jamie's identical. Season 6b is a neat way to get around it but, as with all things for a long running show, you know something's going to change it all later on. And other examples already had, with how the Doctor regenerates going from a TARDIS feature to a survival mechanism with a natural limitation, and even Castrovalva now states that a zero room is needed or how frequencies emitted by the machine can impair regeneration recovery, though some of that might not have been needed if the Hartnell/Troughton regeneration was indeed the first, for which "The Brain of Morbius" is the first to really hint at more going on despite Pertwee stories being the first to claim that Hartnell was decidedly "the earliest" or "first". And that's just 20th century Who discontinuities, a tall order to want to iron out...and its conceit that they dropped off Victoria temporarily doesn't fit the Doctor's inability to steer the TARDIS in that era -- which is the main thing that led to the creation of the "Series 6B" theory that the Time Lords sent the Doctor on secret missions between "The War Games" and "Spearhead from Space," though that's still not a very good patch for it.
Otherwise, I found it mostly entertaining and I enjoyed the interplay between the Doctors, but I was uncomfortable with the Doctor's attitude toward the Androgums as an intrinsically inferior and savage race. It's one thing for the Doctor to have that kind of attitude toward Daleks or Cybermen, who have mighty, destructive empires, but the Androgums are a servant population, so the Doctor's contempt for them as a race feels like punching down, which is out of character.
It's not his worst, to say the least. Do report back to us after seeing it!
No less so than "The Three Doctors" when the returning actors weren't that much older? it was just awesome to see them again.
Following contains possible spoilers, but when in doubt:
When I first saw the story as a kid, I went "That's cool." But I knew nothing of the junkings, much less where the companions did end up at. Later rewatches do reveal some discontinuities, partly due to Holmes' health, last minute location change because funding collapsed (supposedly the American distributor cofinanced what would have been a trip to New Orleans), as well as mixing up how Doctors 2 and 3 acted as 2 acts so much more like 3 in this one. And yet, Troughton still keeps Troughtonisms in it, and Jamie's identical. Season 6b is a neat way to get around it but, as with all things for a long running show, you know something's going to change it all later on. And other examples already had, with how the Doctor regenerates going from a TARDIS feature to a survival mechanism with a natural limitation, and even Castrovalva now states that a zero room is needed or how frequencies emitted by the machine can impair regeneration recovery, though some of that might not have been needed if the Hartnell/Troughton regeneration was indeed the first, for which "The Brain of Morbius" is the first to really hint at more going on despite Pertwee stories being the first to claim that Hartnell was decidedly "the earliest" or "first". And that's just 20th century Who discontinuities, a tall order to want to iron out...
Oh, I do remember in 1986 and wondering why Troughton had the same hairdo, but was gray. But the gripe was brief, upon initial sight at the start of course, and Troughton remained Troughtony in persona throughout so it didn't matter. At least to me, there were fans taking it much more and the modern series has come up with interesting reasons to explain the perceived aging.
Seconded. There's more sympathy for them as they were also subjects for genetic experimentation, which in turn created Chessene (there's a creative name that isn't sledgehammery at all!) But Shockeye wasn't modified, though had blood taken from him to augment the Doctor with and he felt uppity over that when he wasn't changed at all. Just misguided anger, as well as being too easy wanting to eat up some humans.
But the Doctor thought all humans were savages at one point, until Ian and Barbara (and even Susan, who knew the humans better than he had) had to proverbially slap his face via action to show that they were not, since most humans of the 20th century weren't and it wasn't 500AD anymore or any other time period where the Doctor almost lost the ship or almost got killed, etc. On top of other planets with harrowing adventures, early Doctor there was definitely wound up with paranoia over all sorts of species.
A lot of the Androgum stuff was meant to be a pro-vegetarian statement. Robert Holmes was a vegetarian. They were supposed to be unlikeable for that reason. I thought having a species actually interested in eating the companions was risky and it worked for me. And a good enough reason for the Doctor to not like them.All of the androgum stuff is a bit rubbish tbh. Offensive even. In terms of serving the story, only Chessene is needed, and could have been more interesting as a tragic figure. The cannibalism shite is a personal bugbear for me, and it’s that era of Saward being grim for the sake of being grim. The idea of changes rippling down the Doctor’s timeline was interesting, but not really used properly, or enough.
Ironically, it all suffers the same problem we have in the Twin Dilemma, in making the Doctor fundamentally unlikeable for… reasons? Only now it’s an established Doctor, which makes it even worse really.
Aww - Davros was really good, from what I remember. Then they made a series of audios called I, Davros that were good, too.I listened to Omega years ago but I don't remember much about it, so perhaps I wasn't all that enthused by it. Although, out of the villain trilogy, I only enjoyed Master, but even with that one I had some issues with its revelations.
A lot of the Androgum stuff was meant to be a pro-vegetarian statement. Robert Holmes was a vegetarian. They were supposed to be unlikeable for that reason. I thought having a species actually interested in eating the companions was risky and it worked for me. And a good enough reason for the Doctor to not like them.
Now I, Davros was phenomenal, least of all because of how it emulated the equally excellent I, Claudius.Aww - Davros was really good, from what I remember. Then they made a series of audios called I, Davros that were good, too.
It just came over as unnecessarily grim, and I am aware it’s something I find generally nasty and unpleasant and taboo for a reason, particularly as I get older. Whether it’s The Cook, His Wife and Her Lover, or Hannibal, I just find it disgusting.
I’m aware that’s a me problem.
In this episode though? It’s presented in such a way as it probably triggered that reaction in me in the first place. Not least as the Androgums are basically presented as Scots, and are not very alien. Offensive, and no place in Who I reckon.
A lot of the Androgum stuff was meant to be a pro-vegetarian statement. Robert Holmes was a vegetarian. They were supposed to be unlikeable for that reason.
I thought having a species actually interested in eating the companions was risky and it worked for me. And a good enough reason for the Doctor to not like them.
"Logopolis" -
Not to mention, why not go back to Gallifrey to fix the failing components?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.