Yes we do know that one ship survived. Admiral Hanson specified he had 40 ships prepared to intercept the Borg at Wolf-359. In "The Drumhead" Admiral Satie specifies that at Wolf 359 "How many of our ships were destroyed? 39. With a loss of life of nearly 11,000".
It doesn't work like that. Hanson said he had 40 ships and hoped for more. But 40 is a round number. Satie merely estabishes the more accurate number, which was 39, and also reveals that Hanson never got the reinforcements he hoped for.
There's no survivor, because if there were, such a survivor would have been mentioned in one or the other of the relevant episodes. There is never any mention of a surviving ship, and never any mention of a surviving person other than Sisko.
Some suggested that the surviving ship was the U.S.S. Endeavour as in Voyager, Janeway imitates the voice of the captain of the Endeavour in describing how evil the Borg were.
But suggesting that any Borg encounter is automatically a Wolf 359 thing is fallacy. Picard met the Borg five times at least - why wouldn't others?
Lol, yes and they system didn't even register that it beamed up a person. But wasn't that using a personnel transport to beam up cargo?
It was a Very Special transporter at the very least. It was somewhere deep belowdecks, as van Gelden subsequently is spotted down on Deck 14 while on his way up to the Bridge. It is also exclusively provided with some sort of an exposed switchboard on the wall, something we never see on the "regular" transporters on the upper decks.
We have no reason to think that a separate thing called "cargo transporter" would have special properties, though. TNG shows us a couple of types of transporter for moving cargo, and those are seen moving personnel, too.
They don't seem to have cargo transporters in TOS.
Well, transporters down on Deck 14 or so, supposedly near the cargo holds, and moving cargo. Call those whatever you wish.
In ST: Beyond, Scotty states that the cargo transporter settings have to be modified for people so it's not entirely non-canon.
Basically, he says the things were
built for cargo originally. But so were Archer's transporters in ENT. Stamping a few forms seemed to solve
that - but Scotty would be justified in expressing his doubts about using hardware like that.
That is, we don't know for certain if the Federation ever had a transporter that had difficulty or risk wrt the people moving thing. It did use some legacy hardware at first for the task that back in its day may have suffered from difficulty/risk, but even this difficulty/risk is not clearly confirmed.
I suppose they could be a replicated form of stem cells that require some time to adapt to the body's needs. Too many stem cells can't adapt in time?
Or then neural tissue can be replaced by a simplified substitute that sort of becomes a separate, non-integrating implant that handles electric signals only and never bothers to "eat" or "excrete" like living tissue would - while a lung
must grow into an integral part of a fairly complex chemical whole?
Julian Bashir can replace parts of the human(oid) brain with positronic computers easily enough, so perhaps nerves are a triviality to begin with, and tell us nothing about the state of the art as regards livers, lungs or reproductive tissue...
Timo Saloniemi