• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Kurtzman intentionally killed Legacy?

We got "Dear Doctor," in which half the Trek community now believes Archer committed genocide, so I always look at that incident early in the NX-01's mission as a primary example that helped lead to the Prime Directive after the Federation gets started. "One of your first deep space captains condemned half a planet's population to suffering and death because of his feelings. We need to reevaluate what captains can and can't do out there when away from a base and flag officers."

they should have gone so much further. Have Phlox have a plan for how to develop the cure but they can't stay for the months it would take. They give the data and the necessary tech to the scientists and wish them luck. Phlox may have some trepidation about how much more advanced the new med tech is above their current level.

A year later they get word that the scientists messed up and unleashed a virus that wiped out both races. Now there's a incident that could prompt the prime directive.
 
they should have gone so much further. Have Phlox have a plan for how to develop the cure but they can't stay for the months it would take. They give the data and the necessary tech to the scientists and wish them luck. Phlox may have some trepidation about how much more advanced the new med tech is above their current level.

A year later they get word that the scientists messed up and unleashed a virus that wiped out both races. Now there's a incident that could prompt the prime directive.
"Non-interference is the only way."
 
My wife was studying evolutionary biology when this travesty of an episode came out. The Science in the fiction could not be more wrong. It's kind of offensive!
More offensive than FTL and near lightspeed Impuse drives that both ignore general relativity and relativistic effects?

Or a matter Transporter that ignores the Heisenberg Principle and runs on impossibility fast computers that can perfectly disassemble and reassemble multiple people and items in a matter of seconds?

;)
 
More offensive than FTL and near lightspeed Impuse drives that both ignore general relativity and relativistic effects?

Or a matter Transporter that ignores the Heisenberg Principle and runs on impossibility fast computers that can perfectly disassemble and reassemble multiple people and items in a matter of seconds?

;)
Yes, Star Trek gets those two for free. Plus the universal translator and artificial gravity. They figured out how to make them work and they're not telling us how.

They've got to be careful with everything else though, as if it's blatantly wrong then someone's going to be taken out of the story. Like Spock can't run off the edge of a cliff, hang in mid-air for 10 seconds, hold up a sign saying "I'm dead Jim", and then fall, because that contradicts the viewer's understanding of gravity. Doesn't matter if he beamed to the cliff with a transporter after warping in from another star system.
 
Yes, Star Trek gets those two for free. Plus the universal translator and artificial gravity. They figured out how to make them work and they're not telling us how.

They've got to be careful with everything else though, as if it's blatantly wrong then someone's going to be taken out of the story. Like Spock can't run off the edge of a cliff, hang in mid-air for 10 seconds, hold up a sign saying "I'm dead Jim", and then fall, because that contradicts the viewer's understanding of gravity. Doesn't matter if he beamed to the cliff with a transporter after warping in from another star system.
As I understand it, warp speed kinda makes sense and doesn't break special relativity. The ship travels faster than light by contracting space in front of the vessel and expanding it behind. It travels in a warp bubble.

The transporter is more believable and they are least acknowledged issues by having the Heisenberg compensator.

Dear Dr presents evolution as a series of changes that constantly move a species 'forward'. Which is flat out wrong.

In the end, "Dear Doctor" uses bad science to justify leaving hundreds of millions of people to suffer and die of a disease that can be readily cured

The science being wrong makes the episode's message very offensive, because variations of this same misunderstanding of evolution have been at the core of racist and eugenicist ideologies in the real world. The episode is saying that fundamentally, those ideologies might be right, that one group of people can at least in principle be viewed as "more evolved" than others. And no. No they can't, not based on an accurate understanding of evolution.

Note that I summarised from this excellent post, which is wonderful, but verbose.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top