RobertScorpio
Pariah
These two races are probably two of most developed races on Trek. I have read in other posts that many of you either like or do not like how they have fared over the years...So where do you think they succeeded or went off track with these two?
For me? I think the Klingons weathered the writing of Trek better than the Borg. Many of you don't seem to like how they were tamed over time, but I do. I think TNG-DS9 did great justice to the Klingons. The whole 'worf' arc was well done, for the most part. And by the time we get to DS9 and he becomes Martok's buddy, and more importantly, the Federation Ambassador, Worf went full circle.
Yes, they were bad-assed at one point. But had they just stayed that way it would have gotten tired. They evolved and I think that is writing at its best. All of that was ruined, IMO, by Enterprise/Nemesis/Insurrection. But, for me, I just forget those things ever happened and believe that Worf became the Ambassador and thats it. His family name was given back to him, by Martok, and it all ended happily.
The Borg? I have made my views on this on several other posts. But in a nutshell? They started to have bumps in the road on TNG, specifically the whole Lore two-parter. Thought it was awful. And though I liked FC, I have always hated the introduction of the Queen. It gave the Borg someone we could negotiate with. To me that gutted the whole Zombie aspect. Unlike the Klingons, the Borg should never have evolved into nice guys. Guinan/Q suggest the Borg had been this relentless force for thousands of centuries and one meeting with Picard changed them? I doubt it.
They were at their best when they just kept coming after you like a band of Terminators. No negotiation. NO voice to talk to. Just a swarm of Zombies out to take over the galaxy; Resistance is futile.
So...my report card on these two Trek races?
Klingons...B+. Most of it was well done. Some of it wasn't, (Enterprise-Movies) but..yeah..I liked it!
Borg...C-. So much promise, so much potential. They were a scary, a stiff in your face enemy. They were turned into your typical fluffy alien race, and not even Viagra could stiffen them up again.
For me? I think the Klingons weathered the writing of Trek better than the Borg. Many of you don't seem to like how they were tamed over time, but I do. I think TNG-DS9 did great justice to the Klingons. The whole 'worf' arc was well done, for the most part. And by the time we get to DS9 and he becomes Martok's buddy, and more importantly, the Federation Ambassador, Worf went full circle.
Yes, they were bad-assed at one point. But had they just stayed that way it would have gotten tired. They evolved and I think that is writing at its best. All of that was ruined, IMO, by Enterprise/Nemesis/Insurrection. But, for me, I just forget those things ever happened and believe that Worf became the Ambassador and thats it. His family name was given back to him, by Martok, and it all ended happily.
The Borg? I have made my views on this on several other posts. But in a nutshell? They started to have bumps in the road on TNG, specifically the whole Lore two-parter. Thought it was awful. And though I liked FC, I have always hated the introduction of the Queen. It gave the Borg someone we could negotiate with. To me that gutted the whole Zombie aspect. Unlike the Klingons, the Borg should never have evolved into nice guys. Guinan/Q suggest the Borg had been this relentless force for thousands of centuries and one meeting with Picard changed them? I doubt it.
They were at their best when they just kept coming after you like a band of Terminators. No negotiation. NO voice to talk to. Just a swarm of Zombies out to take over the galaxy; Resistance is futile.
So...my report card on these two Trek races?
Klingons...B+. Most of it was well done. Some of it wasn't, (Enterprise-Movies) but..yeah..I liked it!
Borg...C-. So much promise, so much potential. They were a scary, a stiff in your face enemy. They were turned into your typical fluffy alien race, and not even Viagra could stiffen them up again.