Of course it does. It's the bottom line: if the freedom fighters caused suffering while producing no benefit whatsoever, they were the bad guys, with no redeeming qualities to their actions.Yes, the evidence may suggest that most attempts at resistance fail, but that does not invalidate them.
Futile resistance will be an even more decisive factor in promoting and justifying persecution.Moreover, it's less likely that widespread and pervasive persecution will simply subside, especially over a perceived racial divide.
Even worse, freedom fighters seldom have the means of fighting the occupying enemy. Most of freedom fighting in known history consists of attacking the life and property of one's own kin, for a number of reasons. First, they are soft targets, and freedom fighters want to kill or destroy something or they don't have a justification for their existence. Second, it's easy to hate one's neighbor. And third, rather distant third at that, killing of collaborators will hopefully terrorize your kin into not collaborating (whatever good that will do).
Extremely few occupations in history have involved a "purging" element; if there's mass murder, it typically concludes when conquest is completed, and freedom fighting has no say on the issue, it being over before any resistance cells can form. Most conquerors aren't insane: they may terrorize for a while, but they won't purge for the sake of purging.No one is getting on the train to go to a nice sunny place.
Many (although not most) well-known occupations have involved arrangements of extensive and prolonged forced labor, though. Is that worth all the misery that freedom fighting brings about? Well, it might be, if fighting somehow alleviated the suffering from forced labor. It's difficult to see a mechanism by which that would work, though. Blow up an industrial plant, and the slaves only get to do more manual labor. Blow up the slaves, and that will gain you points at the Pearly Gates, not to mention among your kin!
Fighting is an inherently negative thing. It calls for some sort of a justification in order to credibly happen. If there's hope of liberation, then there's your justification all right. If there's none, you're just doing the negative thing for the sake of doing the negative thing.
In the most general terms, grabbing an AK-47 and running to the woods to continue the fight is the solution of a coward. Even if you don't turn into a murdering madman, there are less damaging ways to commit the eventual suicide. At best, what can you gain? A medal once somebody else comes and liberates your country. A happy killing and raping session of collaborators. And afterwards, sleepless nights as you wait for your countrymen to come murder you for all the evil you did.
Timo Saloniemi