Okay I saw it - gave it a solid "Excellent." The only problem I had was the rather tired use of the "evil corporation" as the big baddie, like Ian McShane can't be evil enough in his own right?
But everything else worked. I loved the way they just dove right into alt-history, without feeling the need to explain anything. They have video games, Central Park, and Franz Liszt, but they're a monarchy and the names are all wrong: deal with it.
I appreciated the little touches - the guards gossiping about the royals, King Silas boring everyone with his stupid butterfly story, the enemy soldiers heating up their MRE's on the tank engines. The kid playing David came thru - I was skeptical that he could be anything but bland, but he was the right actor for the role. The royal kids, particularly Jack, struck me as interesting. The existance of a younger brother and threat to Jack was very intriguing.
But if I have to choose between yet another predictably dark and serious and heavily serialized "event genre show" and something like Chuck, a show that breaks the norm, I'll go with Chuck every time.
Honestly, much as I like
Chuck, I think I'd sacrifice it to see where they go with
Kings. But we won't get that choice. If one of these shows survive, it will be
Chuck.
Kings really belongs on AMC, Showtime or HBO. If something as esoteric as
Mad Men can survive, why couldn't
Kings? We'll probably get all the episodes that were scheduled for this year - I don't think the ratings will drop much next week - but that's it.
I'll be watching for as long as it lasts.