I like what I like not because it is popular.
See how influential it still is four hundred years from now, and you may have something. Speaking only for myself, I'm not so sure that I'd want to bet too much.
Heck, I imagine The Simpsons will have a larger and more long-term impact on the general culture than Star Trek has had when everything is said and done.
If you feel Trek is such a trifle, why do you dedicate so much of your time to hang out and post on a fan-forum like this?
That doesn't even make any sense. Am I suppose to automatically elevate Trek to some mythical status because I like it? It is a mostly entertaining TV and movie franchise.
I'm still of the opinion that some people watch Star Trek because they think it makes them look smart or cultured. It does neither.
Simpsons? Bah, give me a Family Guy reference in Star Trek and I'll be eternally happy.
See how influential it still is four hundred years from now, and you may have something. Speaking only for myself, I'm not so sure that I'd want to bet too much.
I have a hard time imagining much that would last into 400 years from today. Entertainment has been exponentially increasing, and I think it's a lot harder to make that kind of mark, especially when most work is derivative anyways. The next four centuries are likely to involve a lot more change than the last four as well.
Aw, you had to make it personal, when by now you ought to know that you're not supposed to do that.Heck, I imagine The Simpsons will have a larger and more long-term impact on the general culture than Star Trek has had when everything is said and done.
If you feel Trek is such a trifle, why do you dedicate so much of your time to hang out and post on a fan-forum like this?
No, I don't see how a reasonable person would assume that's what I'm saying.
See how influential it still is four hundred years from now, and you may have something. Speaking only for myself, I'm not so sure that I'd want to bet too much.
I have a hard time imagining much that would last into 400 years from today. Entertainment has been exponentially increasing, and I think it's a lot harder to make that kind of mark, especially when most work is derivative anyways. The next four centuries are likely to involve a lot more change than the last four as well.
Indeed, and I feel the same way. It's entertainment and a hobby (one of a few), not a frackin' religion.
No, I don't see how a reasonable person would assume that's what I'm saying.
Then what does the fact that it's in the Star Wars universe have to do with the fact that the motivation makes no sense ?
In the SW universe the motivation makes total sense, because Force visions are a real thing and dark side Force powers exist.
. Perhaps, we have seen the last lens flare?
While I agree that Abrams overdid it with the lens flares, they're nothing new in Trek. TMP and the opening titles for TNG had them.
While I agree that Abrams overdid it with the lens flares, they're nothing new in Trek. TMP and the opening titles for TNG had them.
Why do you hate Star Trek?![]()
While I agree that Abrams overdid it with the lens flares, they're nothing new in Trek. TMP and the opening titles for TNG had them.
Why do you hate Star Trek?![]()
Because it's my father's Star Trek and I have daddy issues![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.