I like to think that someone's opening this thread right now thinking it's about working out, and then just going "What the
fuck?"
Pretty much all my fault too. Sorry about that.
Anyway, I think what Trekker means--well, it's what I meant--is that it's maybe about an order of magnitude easier to get laid as a woman, and if that's what you're going for, it's easier to play that side of the table. Men are less choosy, less prone to offense, more easily manipulable. Beyond pure sexual market characteristics, men are also more volatile, far, far, far more prone to acts which are criminal, violent or antisocial, and a lot of boys get sexually assaulted too, you know.
On the flipside, a woman has to deal with a severe disadvantage in physical strength and the accompanying objective as well as perceived disadvantage in personal security, the aforementioned menstruation, and the specter of pregnancy haunting your uterus.*
And I fully recognize that the only way I could sperg out more is by assigning numerical stats. But between the lower testosterone and concomitant lower explosiveness, and the easier access to sex, I'm going to go with woman for the win.**
*On the other hand, you have total dominion over it, at least for a while, which is more than you can say for the other component of any pregnancy. A wash?
** I didn't really mention economic factors here, but my understanding is that the gap is closing very fast, and in many fields (and demographics) women significantly outpace men in terms of income.
Trekker4747 said:
And for as much as I've been told that at some point the girls want the "nice guy" or "it'll happen"
Absolute rubbish, isn't it? Being charitable, "they" (generalizing is hard) want someone who strikes a balance. And people who say "it'll happen" have a weird view of the universe. Stare at that wall all you want, it's not going anywhere till you get a hammer.
Part of that is maybe why I'm working out as, in part, I think maybe it'll help my confidence or something but in the end I doubt it.
You go kick that beach bum's ass, Charles Atlas.
But seriously, keep at it till you're such an imposing physical presence that you make everyone else fade into the background. It's an interesting (read: stupid) relic of evolution that "women" (generalizing) prefer strong men despite how obviously threatening they are. Alternatively, get rich. It's a proxy for strength, and probably better, as you can't buy cool stuff with muscles.
Actually, I've never fully understood why the process would favor childbearers, and primary child caretakers, strikingly smaller than males. If anything, you'd think the males would be smaller, since their only integral value is to provide a mechanism for sexual reproduction. The black widow has the right idea.
Emilia said:
I've visited most countries in Western and South Europe, been to the US once, to Asia once, lived in big cities and in small towns and I've never had any of those nasty things happen to me.
If I've learned one thing from this thread, it's what a dip is. If I've learned two, it's that Brooklyn
suuuucks.
thestrangequark said:
I know it's unsolicited, but if you want some advice I'd say try examining your self-worth independent of sex. This can be difficult for men and women, usually in very different ways, but that doesn't make it impossible. Keep working out, find some other ways to improve your life -- maybe read more, take up an interesting hobby, learn an instrument or something. You can't define yourself solely by how you're viewed by the opposite sex -- believe me, I did it for years and it's a shitty way to live.
It's uncanny how advice can be absolutely true yet terribly impractical for the average person.

But if it's achievable, then this is really the way to go.