I'd say there's really only one person who can answer this: you yourself. It all depends on what you expect the book to be.Is it a good read or will I be dissapointed?
There may not be enough ill-thought, poorly-considered, ranting clat-trap in the book if you're used to Jeremy Clarkson
We need Captain Archer to blow cigarette smoke into an immigrants face while in an indoor public place because he mentioned the enviroment to bring it up to that standard.
Is it a good read or will I be dissapointed?
There may not be enough ill-thought, poorly-considered, ranting clat-trap in the book if you're used to Jeremy Clarkson
We need Captain Archer to blow cigarette smoke into an immigrants face while in an indoor public place because he mentioned the enviroment to bring it up to that standard.
Is it a good read or will I be dissapointed?
It depends.
You will be disappointed it you await the same quality Mangels and Martin delivered with most of their non-Enterprise stuff, but in contrast to the worst novel of the last decade or so (the TGTMD follow-up Kobayashi Maru) it's decent.
Most seem to have liked it, but I'm amongst those who didn't care for it. Mostly because the plot approached the absurd, but also I found the tone disrespectful of the source material and the characters bland and irritating.
Any of it? You people all complain about some absurdities in the plot, and that's OK, but not one of you has bothered to be precise. Use spoiler boxes, and bash away, I'm eager to hear what exactly sucked so hard.I'm with Trent, I couldn't take any of it seriously.
I didn't know dogs count as people, but if I've somehow offended you, please accept my apologies, I really meant no offense.I'm sorry, you must have confused me with your dog, because I sure as fuck don't answer to "you people".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.