• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Joss Whedon in final negotiations to direct "The Avengers"

Status
Not open for further replies.
You know when I first saw this thread I thought they were remaking the British TV show again. It confused me as to why Joss Whedon was involved, but if it's American superheroes running around in spandex and shouting witty one-liners after braining folks, then he's sort of a no-brainer choice (i.e., an apt one).
 
Ah, Godwin'd.....

The most mysterious thing for me is why some people have such antipathy towards him. I truely do not understand it.

Fortunately, I also don't really care.
In a nutshell, there's just a smugness about his writing that rubs me the wrong way. Smugness is rarely an endearing trait to me.

I liked Firefly, but Mal Reynolds did still piss me off at times, particularly the scenes where the undercurrent is 'yeah, ISN'T THIS GUY AWESOME? AND WITTY? BOO-YAH, ANOTHER GENIUS LINE FROM JOSS WHEDON.'

Seems to me that's as much in the viewing as the writing. But at least it's a coherent position, which is more than many are willing to offer. So cool.

And there's Alien 4. I'm not sure which I'm less forgiving of: Him screwing it up, or him stiffing the blame on other people. But one disgresses.

I've only seen Alien 4 once, which is only slightly fewer than I've seen the other movies. Honestly, Aliens is the only one of the bunch I really found to be superior; the rest were decent but nothing special. Alien 3 is the one that put me to sleep; at least AR didn't do that.
 
You seem so confident in this, why don't you prove your assertion?

You are the one who originally made it. Back it up or retract it. I know you won't, though. Sounded good at the time, I suppose.

Hmm...what's this? What's this? A section in wiki on academic interest in just Buffy alone?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffy_studies

Ah, yes, because Wikipedia is such a reliable source. I can edit that article right now and say that Josh's farts smell like rich chocolate ovaltine. :rolleyes:

Besides, if you had actually taken the time to read anything I have written rather than react like a wounded puppy, you'd realize that I already conceded Buffy, thus further nullifying your argument

But, do try again. I find this amusing.
 
Ah, Godwin'd.....

The most mysterious thing for me is why some people have such antipathy towards him. I truely do not understand it.

Fortunately, I also don't really care.
In a nutshell, there's just a smugness about his writing that rubs me the wrong way. Smugness is rarely an endearing trait to me.

I liked Firefly, but Mal Reynolds did still piss me off at times, particularly the scenes where the undercurrent is 'yeah, ISN'T THIS GUY AWESOME? AND WITTY? BOO-YAH, ANOTHER GENIUS LINE FROM JOSS WHEDON.'

And there's Alien 4. I'm not sure which I'm less forgiving of: Him screwing it up, or him stiffing the blame on other people. But one disgresses.

This argument exactly. Glad someone gets it.
 
Nah, I made my point (ie those articles had links, bitch). But you are welcome to share with us where your mind is at (ie the excessive cocksucking references).
 
Nah, I made my point (ie those articles had links, bitch). But you are welcome to share with us where your mind is at (ie the excessive cocksucking references).

Glad you admitted defeat. No hard feelings to you. There is no shame to losing to the better opponent.

One word.

Hitler.

:guffaw::rommie::lol:

Yes, it was quite the devastating argument. I'm not surprised you were unable to counter it (and I don't mean this as a knock. It's a rock solid argument). It is indicative of how people can become so wrapped up in charisma that you don't realize how bad your behaving until its too late.

My kudos to you for graciously bowing out.
 
BlackestPanther, you are so completely and utterly WRONG about Joss Whedon that everything you're trying to argue just makes me want to break out laughing. However, I take particular umbrage with your assertion that his work has not inspired academic and critical evaluation. If you're going to ignore the Wikipedia article that stonester1 linked you to, why don't you try and ignore THIS:
Buffy the Vampire Slayer/ANGEL Publications that are academic/scholarly in nature:
http://www.amazon.com/Sex-Slayer-Ge...=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1271280860&sr=1-1
http://www.amazon.com/Buffy-Meets-A...=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1271280860&sr=1-2
http://www.amazon.com/Buffy-Vampire...=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1271280860&sr=1-3
http://www.amazon.com/Fighting-Forc...=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1271280860&sr=1-6
http://www.amazon.com/Buffy-Angel-C...=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1271280860&sr=1-7
http://www.amazon.com/Psychology-Jo...r_1_11?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1271280860&sr=1-11
http://www.amazon.com/Why-Buffy-Mat...r_1_13?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1271281003&sr=1-13
http://www.amazon.com/Seven-Seasons-Buffy-Favorite-Television/dp/1932100083/ref=pd_sim_b_4
http://www.amazon.com/Undead-TV-Essays-Vampire-Slayer/dp/0822340437/ref=pd_sim_b_6
http://www.amazon.com/Buffy-Goes-Dark-Lynne-Edwards/dp/078643676X/ref=pd_sim_b_7
http://www.amazon.com/Five-Seasons-Angel-Science-Favorite/dp/1932100334/ref=pd_sim_b_8
http://www.amazon.com/Truth-Buffy-Fiction-Illuminating-Reality/dp/0786437995/ref=pd_sim_b_9
http://www.amazon.com/What-Would-Buffy-Do-Spiritual/dp/0787969222/ref=pd_sim_b_12
http://www.amazon.com/Reading-Vampire-Slayer-Unofficial-Contemporary/dp/186064984X/ref=pd_sim_b_14
http://www.amazon.com/Televised-Morality-Buffy-Vampire-Slayer/dp/0761828338/ref=pd_sim_b_24

Firefly/Serenity Publications that are academic/scholarly in nature:
http://www.amazon.com/Finding-Serenity-Anti-Heroes-Shepherds-Hookers/dp/1932100431/ref=pd_sim_b_3
http://www.amazon.com/Investigating-Firefly-Serenity-Science-Frontier/dp/1845116542/ref=pd_sim_b_5
http://www.amazon.com/Serenity-Found-Unauthorized-Whedons-Universe/dp/1933771216/ref=pd_sim_b_6

I could keep going, but I won't.

Note to the mods: I apologize for the excessive links, but hopefully you'll see the point of what I was trying to do.
 
Again, I conceded Buffy. DUH. Someone needs a reading comprehension course.

The Firefly stuff is fluff, nothing more. There is nothing peer-reviewed in them at all. Books, as written, do not automatically qualify as "academic". Not unless they are peer-reviewed.


Try again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top