Re: Japan hit by 8.9 earthquake.
I would guess that it's part of the Japanese psyche to follow the manual to the letter even more than usual in the nuclear industry. Unfortunately, I doubt the manual didn't envisage this particular combination of circumstances with multiple reactors operating outside safety limits after an earthquake 5 times stronger than they were designed to withstand, plus the tsunami on top of that. I can understand the attitude -- things screwed up at Chernobyl and 3-Mile Island because procedures weren't followed properly. Hydrogen detonation is a well known risk of LOCAs so I don't understand why there wasn't a mechanism to deal with it effectively. Perhaps it's related to the loss of power to the plant or damage due to the quake or tsunami.
IAEA says the Fukushima plant operators are considering removing panels from these last two reactor buildings to prevent a build-up of hydrogen.
That does seem like the obvious solution. Why didn't they do it sooner?
I would guess that it's part of the Japanese psyche to follow the manual to the letter even more than usual in the nuclear industry. Unfortunately, I doubt the manual didn't envisage this particular combination of circumstances with multiple reactors operating outside safety limits after an earthquake 5 times stronger than they were designed to withstand, plus the tsunami on top of that. I can understand the attitude -- things screwed up at Chernobyl and 3-Mile Island because procedures weren't followed properly. Hydrogen detonation is a well known risk of LOCAs so I don't understand why there wasn't a mechanism to deal with it effectively. Perhaps it's related to the loss of power to the plant or damage due to the quake or tsunami.