The Clancy books are a right-wing circle jerk, I read a few of them and he always likes to slip in some millionaire banker who's a great guy.
So who is the great guy in left-wing circle jerks?

The Clancy books are a right-wing circle jerk, I read a few of them and he always likes to slip in some millionaire banker who's a great guy.
Rainbow Six isn't a Jack Ryan story. The Sum of All Fears was the subject of the last attempt to reboot the franchise, so there's no way they'd start with that again. China brings you into "President Ryan" territory, an entirely different type of movie than the one they want to make, and means you can't market the film in China, which will cost them revenue.Why do people persist in thinking this?
Islamic terrorism is an ongoing threat TODAY. Environmental terrorism is an ongoing threat TODAY. The possibility of having to deal with China as a rogue state is an ongoing possibility TODAY, all of which means that several of Clancy's stories can be adapted and set TODAY without creating an "alternate history" of anything. This is what I'm trying to say, and I'm afraid to few people - especially the idiots in Hollywood - have the imagination to understand that.
Jesus?The Clancy books are a right-wing circle jerk, I read a few of them and he always likes to slip in some millionaire banker who's a great guy.
So who is the great guy in left-wing circle jerks?![]()
This, although I agree with your entire but I want to emphasize this part. There's absolutely nothing about Jack Ryan that interests me. I love, love The Hunt for Red October but Ryan is one of the least interesting aspects about it (hell, for a long time I didn't even like Baldwin's portrayal, wishing Ford was in it instead, but I've since changed my tune). Clear and Present Danger is another great film but the only thing that makes Ryan interesting is that he's played by Harrison Ford and he's really pissed off! I don't remember much about Patriot Games or The Sum of All Fears, other than I didn't like them at all.What puzzles me too is that, without Clancy's proven brand and his dedication to technical specs, adherence to scenarios that could just happen, is there anything particularly interesting about Jack Ryan himself? I mean, he's not like James Bond, who is a hard drinking, womanizing, occasionally wise-cracking veteran assassin, beloved in the books and the big screen.
Ryan is a family man and analyst, not a man of action. The situations he gets into are what makes him interesting rather than he himself. Why not just create their own character, if they're not going to adopt Clancy's novels? Will Ryan be able to compete with the likes of Bourne, Bond or the likes?
If Paramount really wanted to build a big, consistent franchise, they'd stop worrying about when the stories are set and just try their best to stick to them. They need to actually try to get the book readers to spend money on movie tickets, and the best way to do that is to bring the written stories to life.
Maybe, maybe not. I'm not sure that casual audiences - and these movies will have to appeal to more than the Clancy readership, big and all as that is, to really make a buck - will necessarily want to see a series of movies set in a sort of 'alternate history' of the 1980s or 1990s.
Why do people persist in thinking this?
Islamic terrorism is an ongoing threat TODAY. Environmental terrorism is an ongoing threat TODAY. The possibility of having to deal with China as a rogue state is an ongoing possibility TODAY, all of which means that several of Clancy's stories can be adapted and set TODAY without creating an "alternate history" of anything. This is what I'm trying to say, and I'm afraid to few people - especially the idiots in Hollywood - have the imagination to understand that.
Deadline told you two weeks ago that Paramount was courting Kevin Costner to play a key role opposite Chris Pine in the Kenneth Branagh-directed Jack Ryan film. I’m told that Costner has now accepted and they are working out a deal that will give him the chance to become a linchpin in not only the Jack Ryan film with Chris Pine, but also the spinoff franchise Without Remorse, for which the studio is now courting The Dark Knight Rises villain Tom Hardy, with Christopher McQuarrie rewriting to direct.
And the deal coming together envisions Costner potentially headlining his own film. He will play William Harper, a true blue American idealist who recruits and mentors both Ryan and John Kelly, the latter of whom becomes the CIA operative Clark by the end of Without Remorse.
So they're looking to build their own little Tom Clancy Cinemetic Universe? Interesting idea...
According to their Wikipedia articles, Clark was born in 1944 and Ryan in 1950. Tom Hardy was born in 1977 and Pine in 1980. Eh, close enough.
^ Apparently there are plans afoot to adapt Without Remorse, a Clark novel. Chris McQuarrie (The Usual Suspects and the forthcoming Reacher movie) has been offered it.
Of course, this may end up being entirely divorced from the Ryan movies, thus pissing off Clancy's readership even further.
http://www.movieswithbutter.com/Uncategorized/Christopher-McQuarrie-Is-Without-Remorse
http://www.deadline.com/2012/08/par...er-to-rev-jack-ryan-and-without-remorse-pics/
Deadline told you two weeks ago that Paramount was courting Kevin Costner to play a key role opposite Chris Pine in the Kenneth Branagh-directed Jack Ryan film. I’m told that Costner has now accepted and they are working out a deal that will give him the chance to become a linchpin in not only the Jack Ryan film with Chris Pine, but also the spinoff franchise Without Remorse, for which the studio is now courting The Dark Knight Rises villain Tom Hardy, with Christopher McQuarrie rewriting to direct.
And the deal coming together envisions Costner potentially headlining his own film. He will play William Harper, a true blue American idealist who recruits and mentors both Ryan and John Kelly, the latter of whom becomes the CIA operative Clark by the end of Without Remorse.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.