• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Jack Ryan Reboot

Why do people persist in thinking this?

Islamic terrorism is an ongoing threat TODAY. Environmental terrorism is an ongoing threat TODAY. The possibility of having to deal with China as a rogue state is an ongoing possibility TODAY, all of which means that several of Clancy's stories can be adapted and set TODAY without creating an "alternate history" of anything. This is what I'm trying to say, and I'm afraid to few people - especially the idiots in Hollywood - have the imagination to understand that.
Rainbow Six isn't a Jack Ryan story. The Sum of All Fears was the subject of the last attempt to reboot the franchise, so there's no way they'd start with that again. China brings you into "President Ryan" territory, an entirely different type of movie than the one they want to make, and means you can't market the film in China, which will cost them revenue.
 
What puzzles me too is that, without Clancy's proven brand and his dedication to technical specs, adherence to scenarios that could just happen, is there anything particularly interesting about Jack Ryan himself? I mean, he's not like James Bond, who is a hard drinking, womanizing, occasionally wise-cracking veteran assassin, beloved in the books and the big screen.

Ryan is a family man and analyst, not a man of action. The situations he gets into are what makes him interesting rather than he himself. Why not just create their own character, if they're not going to adopt Clancy's novels? Will Ryan be able to compete with the likes of Bourne, Bond or the likes?
This, although I agree with your entire but I want to emphasize this part. There's absolutely nothing about Jack Ryan that interests me. I love, love The Hunt for Red October but Ryan is one of the least interesting aspects about it (hell, for a long time I didn't even like Baldwin's portrayal, wishing Ford was in it instead, but I've since changed my tune). Clear and Present Danger is another great film but the only thing that makes Ryan interesting is that he's played by Harrison Ford and he's really pissed off! I don't remember much about Patriot Games or The Sum of All Fears, other than I didn't like them at all.

As you said, the only thing that makes Ryan at all interesting is that he's a fish out of water. There's only so many times you can do that before it becomes repetitive and counterintuitive. He doesn't bring anything intriguing to the table like James Bond and Jason Bourne do.
 
If Paramount really wanted to build a big, consistent franchise, they'd stop worrying about when the stories are set and just try their best to stick to them. They need to actually try to get the book readers to spend money on movie tickets, and the best way to do that is to bring the written stories to life.

Maybe, maybe not. I'm not sure that casual audiences - and these movies will have to appeal to more than the Clancy readership, big and all as that is, to really make a buck - will necessarily want to see a series of movies set in a sort of 'alternate history' of the 1980s or 1990s.

Why do people persist in thinking this?

Islamic terrorism is an ongoing threat TODAY. Environmental terrorism is an ongoing threat TODAY. The possibility of having to deal with China as a rogue state is an ongoing possibility TODAY, all of which means that several of Clancy's stories can be adapted and set TODAY without creating an "alternate history" of anything. This is what I'm trying to say, and I'm afraid to few people - especially the idiots in Hollywood - have the imagination to understand that.

Ah, I understand you now. But from your original post, I understood you to be arguing in favour of exact adaptations of the novels set in their original time frame. That's what I thought you meant by 'stop worrying when they're set.'
 
I have to say I just don't really understand. First off, is Jack Ryan a big enough name anymore to draw a large mainstream audience? If not, what is the logic behind using the characters name for something not tied to any of the books. Ryan has NEVER been an action star, even the movie of Clear and Present Danger sort of shoehorned Ryan into the finale to give him something to do. Personally, John Clark was almost always the action guy in Clancy's novels and much more interesting. Something which the film of The Sum of All Fears COMPLETELY screwed up.

They should focus on John Clark and make Rainbow Six or maybe even Debt of Honor, although that ending may be tough to do in this day and age. Hell, if Clancy's name is the draw, I'd make Red Storm Rising even though its probably impossible to do in a 2-3 hour movie.

At this point, I'm much more looking forward to seeing Vince Flynn's Mitch Rapp on screen. Hopefully, at some point, they'll make Memorial Day into a film. That would make an awesome movie.
 
I read Clancy's books up through the early-00s. (The last I read was Red Rabbit.) I loved The Hunt for Red October film, though Patriot Games was merely adequate, and enjoyed Clear and Present Danger. (I've not seen The Sum of All Fears.) I'm not exactly sure why you'd do a Jack Ryan movie at this point. I understand why you did a Jack Ryan movie in the 1980s -- Tom Clancy was one of the best-selling authors on the planet at that time, and movie studios could do movies without the expectation of launching franchises -- but Clancy isn't the name that he was then (and, to the extent that he is, people today know Clancy's name for Ubisoft's games like Rainbox Six, Splinter Cell, and Ghost Recon), and Jack Ryan doesn't exactly lend himself to franchisability.

One problem, as has been pointed out above, is that there are two Jack Ryan eras. There's the CIA Analyst era, when he's a desk jockey who gets lucky and goes out in the field on occasion. And there's the political animal era, when Jack Ryan ultimately finds himself in the White House.

The political animal era, frankly, would make a pretty good television series -- it would be the conservative West Wing, basically -- but I don't see what you would do with the CIA Analyst era that hasn't been done already. And Ryan isn't that compelling a character.
 
The only Clancy novel I liked was Red Storm Rising. The Hunt For Red October was barely readable.
 
I was a big Clancy fan, even though I wasn't always 100% with him politically,but I think his mindset changed after 9/11 (as did a lot of writers') and I found I wasn't as keen.

I'd agree that Ryan doesn't scream reboot! And frankly I'd much prefer a John Clark/Domingo Chavez series of films. Hell there's a great trilogy there to be made. start with Without Remorce, a low budget thriller, then move onto Clear and Present Danger as an out and out war film focusing on Clark and Chavez with Ryan as just a peripheral character, then you finish off with Rainbow Six and a full on big budget Bond style blockbuster :)
 
The original plan I believe was indeed to adapt "Red Rabbit" after "The Sum of All Fears" with Ben Affleck reprising the role. The book's poor reviews though I assume changed Paramount's mind and they decided to just reboot the entire franchise. As I've said a couple of times, this project has changed and been through a lot of drafts and writers prior to Branagh coming aboard. Prior to now it was known as "Moscow" for the longest time. I think it's been called "Jack Ryan" only for the last few months to a year.

I'm a Ryan fan and a Chris Pine fan. The cast seems great so far and with Branagh directing I'm definitely interested. Demotion mentioned "Without Remorse" which has been in development hell since Paramount obtained the film rights shortly after the novel came out. Chris McQuarrie's script is the latest attempt.
 
http://www.deadline.com/2012/08/par...er-to-rev-jack-ryan-and-without-remorse-pics/

Deadline told you two weeks ago that Paramount was courting Kevin Costner to play a key role opposite Chris Pine in the Kenneth Branagh-directed Jack Ryan film. I’m told that Costner has now accepted and they are working out a deal that will give him the chance to become a linchpin in not only the Jack Ryan film with Chris Pine, but also the spinoff franchise Without Remorse, for which the studio is now courting The Dark Knight Rises villain Tom Hardy, with Christopher McQuarrie rewriting to direct.

And the deal coming together envisions Costner potentially headlining his own film. He will play William Harper, a true blue American idealist who recruits and mentors both Ryan and John Kelly, the latter of whom becomes the CIA operative Clark by the end of Without Remorse.
 
I'm kind of amused by the idea of Tom Hardy playing Clark in this proposed shared setting, since he and Chris Pine recently played friends/intelligence agents in This Means War. :p
 
I like the idea of Hardy as Clark, though I always got the feeling clark was a lot older than Ryan (then again I guess Hardy is a fair few years older than Pine?)

Edit, actually he's only 3 years older, but maybe I got the wrong impression from the books and they are more contemporaries?
 
Last edited:
According to their Wikipedia articles, Clark was born in 1944 and Ryan in 1950. Tom Hardy was born in 1977 and Pine in 1980. Eh, close enough.
 
According to their Wikipedia articles, Clark was born in 1944 and Ryan in 1950. Tom Hardy was born in 1977 and Pine in 1980. Eh, close enough.

Yeah that'd definitelty work with Pine/Hardy then. Maybe its time to reread the books, I always felt Clark was a good decade (at least) older than Ryan :lol:
 
^ Apparently there are plans afoot to adapt Without Remorse, a Clark novel. Chris McQuarrie (The Usual Suspects and the forthcoming Reacher movie) has been offered it.

Of course, this may end up being entirely divorced from the Ryan movies, thus pissing off Clancy's readership even further.

http://www.movieswithbutter.com/Uncategorized/Christopher-McQuarrie-Is-Without-Remorse

http://www.deadline.com/2012/08/par...er-to-rev-jack-ryan-and-without-remorse-pics/

Deadline told you two weeks ago that Paramount was courting Kevin Costner to play a key role opposite Chris Pine in the Kenneth Branagh-directed Jack Ryan film. I’m told that Costner has now accepted and they are working out a deal that will give him the chance to become a linchpin in not only the Jack Ryan film with Chris Pine, but also the spinoff franchise Without Remorse, for which the studio is now courting The Dark Knight Rises villain Tom Hardy, with Christopher McQuarrie rewriting to direct.

And the deal coming together envisions Costner potentially headlining his own film. He will play William Harper, a true blue American idealist who recruits and mentors both Ryan and John Kelly, the latter of whom becomes the CIA operative Clark by the end of Without Remorse.

So much for my powers of clairvoyance (re keeping the characters separate). I'm available if anyone wants me to predict their future, the lottery numbers, etc...

Apart from the Marvelverse, can anyone think of another cinematic universe which has been created in this joined-up way? I'm sure it has been done, but off the top of my head, I can't think of any.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top