I'd have been 23/24? yeah right.....maybe his hard life is the reason he looks at least 10 years older.
I did think when they did the long close-up of his face that they need to avoid doing that if they want to sell that he is 24!
I'd have been 23/24? yeah right.....maybe his hard life is the reason he looks at least 10 years older.
Still waiting for someone to deepfake this guy into all of James McAvoy's X-Men movies and Star Trek Nemesis.There's a precedence for it
![]()
![]()
Classic Trek.C’mon. It’s Star Trek. The needs of the drama outweigh the needs of verisimilitude (since 1966).![]()
Where is the disconnect? A nineteen year old cadet or crewman isn't out of the ordinary, How much older than Stashwick does Shaw have to be? Most ensigns would be what 21 or 22 upon getting their commission, so not much older.Todd Stashwick is 54, but he was a "young grease monkey" during Wolf 359 (2366), so if S3 is set in 2401, he would've been 19 then. Unless Shaw is supposed to be a deal older than Stashwick
Most Trek complaints are.This is a non issue an
It's "roller coaster", get it right!house of horror Turbolifts.
Was he playing Doug Wert?Exactly. Doug Wert was born in 1961. When he appeared as Jack in "Family" in 1990, he'd have been 29. Since that recording was made around when Wesley was born in 2349 or so, it means Jack would have been born in the late 2310s! How can he possibly have gone to the Academy with Picard?????!!!!!!!
Yes. See Stewart, Patrick.Are you saying the actor's age does not necessarily need to align with the character's???
Yes. See Stewart, Patrick.
Picard was notI'm pretty sure Patrick Stewart was 59 when TNG started, and that he's now 96.
DRINK!Well the actor who plays Jack Crusher is 34 and damn if he don't look it.
So that was some rough 23 years.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.