• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

J.R.R. Tolkien's "Beren and Lúthien" will be published next year

I don't think the cast changeover would be as frequent as episode to episode, rather it would be season to season. Fargo, True Detective, and American Horror Story (and presumably American Crime Story) all show you can do a successful show with a rotating cast.
The book has a bunch of gods(with one overarching God with a capital G) arrogant elves on a doomed quest. Humans don't show up until the first age of the sun and aren't really significant story wise until the downfall of numenor-the akallabeth and neither the quenta silmarillion proper nor the Akallabeth have happy endings. Tell me as Hollywood exec how exactly will handle these and ther issues without completely trashing the source material?
 
They don't have to adapt everything nor do they need to do it in chronological order. Cherry pick the best stories.
 
The book has a bunch of gods(with one overarching God with a capital G) arrogant elves on a doomed quest. Humans don't show up until the first age of the sun and aren't really significant story wise until the downfall of numenor-the akallabeth and neither the quenta silmarillion proper nor the Akallabeth have happy endings. Tell me as Hollywood exec how exactly will handle these and ther issues without completely trashing the source material?
Well, some tweaking would probably be necessary as it is with most adaptations. For instance, a straightforward linear telling of the events probably wouldn't be the best way to go. Maybe they could have a split story format, with your cast of regular recurring characters that may be in the later days of the events, while the other half of the story tells the great historical events of the distant past in a way that's pertinent to the main story, with a constantly changing cast.

I realize as I read that back to myself, that I'm thinking of something similar to the format of Arrow. Except the flashbacks would command equal screen time as the main story, and hopefully not be as meaningless as the Arrow flashbacks tend to be.
 
I didn't much care for Hurin, it seemed to lack the magic of Tolkien's writing. Nonethless, I think a movie (or dualogy) from Peter Jackson can do justice to either Hurin or Beren and Luthien.
 
Well, some tweaking would probably be necessary as it is with most adaptations. For instance, a straightforward linear telling of the events probably wouldn't be the best way to go. Maybe they could have a split story format, with your cast of regular recurring characters that may be in the later days of the events, while the other half of the story tells the great historical events of the distant past in a way that's pertinent to the main story, with a constantly changing cast.

I realize as I read that back to myself, that I'm thinking of something similar to the format of Arrow. Except the flashbacks would command equal screen time as the main story, and hopefully not be as meaningless as the Arrow flashbacks tend to be.
How do you explain then they film the ainulindale? The valaquenta? It would show a bunch of angels singing creating the world, then engaging a Satan figure for all intents and purposes. The akallabeth at the end has God destroying a continent and imprisoning a whole army in caves. While reshaping the world in the process? In today's post Christian ultra secular society how well will that do with audiences?
 
How do you explain then they film the ainulindale? The valaquenta? It would show a bunch of angels singing creating the world, then engaging a Satan figure for all intents and purposes. The akallabeth at the end has God destroying a continent and imprisoning a whole army in caves. While reshaping the world in the process? In today's post Christian ultra secular society how well will that do with audiences?
Folks seem to watch all sorts of shows with stuff like that. Lucifer, Supernatural, True Blood, The Lord of the Rings, they all seem to do pretty well. That's the funny thing about fiction. Suspension of disbelief, works for most people.
 
Folks seem to watch all sorts of shows with stuff like that. Lucifer, Supernatural, True Blood, The Lord of the Rings, they all seem to do pretty well. That's the funny thing about fiction. Suspension of disbelief, works for most people.
Okay how do you plan on depicting the timeless halls? The valaquenta? The CGI would either be very gratuitous or you would end up with it being more abstract and hence by definition for audiences to understand.
 
Okay how do you plan on depicting the timeless halls? The valaquenta? The CGI would either be very gratuitous or you would end up with it being more abstract and hence by definition for audiences to understand.
Folks in theater and cinema do stuff like that all the time. It's their job. Audiences come to see those stories, they have for ages. They come for an entertaining story. If the story is entertaining, the rest is largely inconsequential.
 
Okay then the somewhat hopeless ending-Feanor's doom and all that-audiences are too soft for that sort of thing?
Your endless question thing not withstanding, there's nothing that fundamentally makes the Silmarillion unfilmable. Or make it unentertaining for people. Tragedy has always played well in film and theater.
 
But endless questions are the bedrock for understanding, growth, and philosophical and moral progress.

Anyway I admire your confidence-maybe I'll catch you in a theater in 70 years(once it enters the public domain).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top